The sustainability challenges of nascent firms in developing economies were a motivation for this study. Hence, a direct effect of entrepreneurial finance on nascent firms’ sustainability was investigated. The study proposed an integrative model that accounts for innovation capability and government support, as mechanisms in explaining the entrepreneurial finance and sustainability nexus. Data collection was with questionnaire from a sample set of 235 nascent entrepreneurs. Structural equation model with the aid of SmartPLS was used for the data analysis. The study found that entrepreneurial finance, innovation capability and government support all have a direct positive effect on nascent firms’ sustainability. Innovation capability, in contrast, partially mediates the relation between entrepreneurial finance and sustainability. However, the study failed to account for a conditional effect of government support on the indirect effect of innovation capability on nascent firms’ sustainability. The study validates the resource dependence theory as a theoretical lens and highlights the fundamental issues that drive sustainability as it relates to new-born firms, most especially from an emerging economy perspective.
AdamN. A., & AlarifiG. (2021). Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: The role of external support. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6
2.
AjorL., & AlikorL.O. (2020). Innovative mindset and organizational sustainability of small and medium enterprises in Rivers State, Nigeria. British Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 3(1), 20–36.
3.
AlkahtaniA., NordinN., & KhanR. U. (2020). Does government support enhance the relation between networking structure and sustainable competitive performance among SMEs?Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00127-3
4.
AnwarM., TajeddiniK., & UllahR. (2020). Entrepreneurial finance and new venture success—The moderating role of government support. Business Strategy & Development, 3(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.105
5.
AyyagariM., Demirgüç-KuntA., & MaksimovicV. (2012). Financing of firms in developing countries: Lessons from research. (Policy Research Working Paper 6036). World Bank.
6.
BabarindeS. A. (2021). Innovation and firm’s sustainable advantage: A study of the telecommunication industry in Nigeria. Innovations, 64(1), 1055–1068
7.
BellavitisC., FilatotchevI., KamuriwoD. S., & VanackerT. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance: New frontiers of research and practice. Venture Capital, 19(1-2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1259733
8.
BellucciM., BiniL., & GiuntaF. (2020). Implementing environmental sustainability engagement into business: Sustainability management, innovation, and sustainable business models. In GalanakisC. M. (Ed.), Innovation strategies in environmental science (pp. 107–143). Elsevier.
9.
BhaumikS.K., FraserS., & WrightM. (2015). What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth?International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 70–88. ISSN 1741-2870
10.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press
Cano-KollmannM., HamiltonR. D., & MudambiR. (2016). Public support for innovation and the openness of firms’ innovation activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, dtw025. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw025
13.
ChemmanurT. J., & FilthierP. (2014). Entrepreneurial finance and innovation: An introduction and agenda for future research. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht063
14.
ChinW. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In MarcoulidesG. A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
15.
ChoiS. K., HanS., & KwakK. T. (2021). Innovation capabilities and the performance of start-ups in Korea: The role of government support policies. Sustainability, 13(11), 6009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116009
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
17.
CummingD., DeloofM., ManigartS., & WrightM. (2019). New directions in entrepreneurial finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100(1), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.02.008
18.
CummingD., & JohanS. (2017). The problems with and promise of entrepreneurial finance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.10.1002/sej.1265
19.
DasguptaM., GuptaR. K., & SahayA. (2011). Linking technological innovation, technology strategy and organizational factors. Global Business Review, 12(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091101200206
20.
De PrijckerS., ManigartS., CollewaertV., & VanackerT. (2017). Relocation to get venture capital: A resource dependence perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(4), 697–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717739003
21.
DilgerR. J. (2018). Small business administration and job creation. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/79141
22.
EmenikeB. (2021). Impact of entrepreneurial finance on business start-ups in Rivers state, Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 7(7), 1–16.
23.
EzeI. R., AgbaezeE. K., IsicheiE. E., & EkeC. (2021). Social media usage and competitive advantage of nascent agro-allied firms. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.32
24.
FrankeG., & SarstedtM. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.10.1108/intr-12-2017-0515
25.
GaiesB., NajarD., MaalaouiA., KrausS., & El TarabishyA. (2021). Does financial development really spur nascent entrepreneurship in Europe?—A panel data analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1896722
26.
GarbaA. (2020). Effect of government policies on the growth of micro-enterprises in Makurdi metropolis, Benue state, Nigeria. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 9(1), 29–41
27.
GoldensteinJ., HunoldtM., & OertelS. (2019). How optimal distinctiveness affects new ventures’ failure risk: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 477–495.
28.
GuanJ., & MaN. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737–747.
29.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson
30.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–14
31.
HanayshaJ. R. (2020). Innovation capabilities and authentic leadership: Do they really matter to firm performance?Journal of Asia–Pacific Business, 21(4), 1–20.
32.
HanayshaJ. R., Al-ShaikhM. E., JogheeS., & AlzoubiH. M. (2022). Impact of innovation capabilities on business sustainability in small and medium enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211042232
33.
HartonoA., & KusumawardhaniR. (2018). Innovation barriers and their impact on innovation: Evidence from indonesian manufacturing firms. Global Business Review, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918801647
34.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
35.
HechavarrıaD. M., MatthewsC. H., & ReynoldsP. D. (2016). Does start-up financing influence startup speed? Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 46(1), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9680-y
36.
HuhtalaJ.-P., SihvonenA., FrösénJ., JaakkolaM., & TikkanenH. (2014). Market orientation, innovation capability and business performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 134–152. doi:10.1108/bjm-03-2013-0044
37.
IboboB. I. (2018). Business ethics and organizational sustainability: A study of micro, small and medium scale enterprises in Asaba, Delta State. Gusau International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), 316–335.
38.
Jimenez-JimenezD., & Sanz-ValleR. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
39.
KerrW. R., LernerJ., & SchoarA. (2014). The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1): 20–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr098
40.
KhanE. A., & QuaddusM. (2015). Development and validation of a scale for measuring sustainability factors of informal microenterprises: A qualitative and quantitative approach. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 347–372
41.
KhattakM. S., AnwarM., & ClaußT. (2021). The role of entrepreneurial finance in corporate social responsibility and new venture performance in an emerging market. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(2), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211025655
42.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (SEM) (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
43.
LaiW. H., LinC. C., & WangT. C. (2015). Exploring the interoperability of innovation capability and corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.043
44.
LawsonB., & SamsonD. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377–400.
LongA., WoodM. S., & BennettD. L. (2022). Entrepreneurial organizing activities and nascent venture performance. Small Business Economics, 60, 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00595-1
47.
LuoX., HuangF., TangX., & LiJ. (2020). Government subsidies and firm performance: Evidence from high-tech start-ups in China. Emerging Markets Review, 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100756
48.
Maldonado-GuzmánG., Garza-ReyesJ. A., Pinzón-CastroS. Y., & KumarV. (2020). Innovation capabilities and performance: Are they truly linked in SMEs?International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2017-0139
49.
MustaphaA., & TlatyJ. (2018). The entrepreneurial finance and the issue of funding startup companies. European Scientific Journal, 14(13), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n13p268
50.
NakkuV. B., AgbolaF. W., MilesM. P., & MahmoodA. (2019). The interrelationship between SME government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659671
51.
NeelyA., FilippiniR., ForzaC., VinelliA., & HiiJ. (2001). A framework for analysing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 114–124.
52.
NguyenM.-H., PhamT.-H., HoM.-T., NguyenH. T. T., & VuongQ.-H. (2020). On the social and conceptual structure of the 50-year research landscape in entrepreneurial finance. SN Business & Economics, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-020-00002-z
53.
NnabuifeE. K., & OnwuzuligboL. T. (2015). Sustainability and corporate longevity of firms in Nigeria: A study of selected firms. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(18), 213–223.
54.
OtacheI., & UsangO. U. E. (2022). Innovation capability and SME performance in times of economic crisis: Does government support moderate?African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-08-2021-0362
55.
PfefferJ. & SalancikG.R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford Business Books, Stanford.
56.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., & PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
57.
ReynoldsP. D. (2007). New firm creation in the United States A PSED I overview. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000010
58.
ReynoldsP. D., & CurtinR. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(1),155–169. https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/ENT-022
59.
RosenbuschN., BrinckmannJ., & BauschA. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.
60.
RoundyP. (2019). To bridge or buffer? A resource dependence theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11, 550–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-06-2018-0064
61.
SherP. J., & YangP. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33–43.
62.
SonglingY., IshtiaqM., AnwarM., & AhmedH. (2018). The role of government support in sustainable competitive position and firm performance. Sustainability, 10(10), 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103495
63.
SriboonlueP., UssahawanitchakiP., & RaksongS. (2016). Strategic innovation capability and firm sustainability: Evidence from auto parts businesses in Thailand. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(2), 11–29.
64.
SulistyoH., & AyunS. (2018). How does knowledge absorption foster performance? The mediating effect of innovation capability. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 9(1), 114–125.
65.
TekeleA. A. (2019). Factors affecting the performance of micro and small enterprises in Wolita Sodo Town. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management. 6(12), 18–26.
66.
TsaiM. T., & TsaiT. L. (2010). Innovation capability and performance in Taiwanese science parks: Exploring the moderating effects of industrial cluster fabric. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 2(4), 80–104.
67.
VaziraniA., & BhattacharjeeT. (2021). Entrepreneurial finance in the twenty-first century, a review of factors influencing venture capitalist’s decision. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(2), 306–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211025654
68.
WarhuusJ. P., FridC. J., & GartnerW. B. (2021). Ready or not? Nascent entrepreneurs’ actions and the acquisition of external financing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(6), 1605–1628. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2020-0586
69.
WasiuzzamanS., NurdinN., AbdullahA. H., & VinayanG. (2020). Creditworthiness and access to finance of SMEs in Malaysia: Do linkages with large firms matter?Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(2), 197–217.
70.
YuShengK., & IbrahimM. (2020). Innovation capabilities, innovation types, and firm performance: Evidence from the banking sector of Ghana. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020920892
71.
Zulu-ChisangaS., ChabalaM., & Mandawa-BrayB. (2021). The differential effects of government support, inter-firm collaboration and firm resources on SME performance in a developing economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2019-0105
