This article aims to investigate the effect of countries’ culture on women’s right to economic participation. As a secondary objective, the article aims to analyse the effect of culture on the progress made in the laws of the countries over the last five decades. The dataset comprises the national culture dimensions of Hofstede and the scores related to gender inequalities in the law provided in the Women, Business and the Law (WBL) database from The World Bank. Using multivariate regression analysis, we evaluated the effect of the cultural dimensions on the current WBL scores and on the variation of the WBL scores over the last five decades. The results show that the dimensions of culture (individualism, uncertainty avoidance and power distance) affect women’s right to economic participation and/or the evolution of laws in this direction. The results also suggest that although some countries still have much to advance in their legislation, more and more countries are reaching the goal of having an egalitarian society.
AvolioB. (2021). Peruvian women’s underrepresentation in science and technology: Strategic guidelines. Global Business Review, 1–24. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09721509211029727
2.
BlockJ. H., & WalterS. G. (2017). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and modes of entry into entrepreneurship. In BonnetJ., DejardinM., & García-Pérez-de-LemaD. (Eds.), Exploring the entrepreneurial society: Institutions, behaviors and outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 22–35). Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
Bobbitt-ZeherD. (2011). Gender discrimination at work: Connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender & Society, 25(6), 764–786.
4.
BogatyrevaK., EdelmanL. F., ManolovaT. S., OsiyevskyyO., & ShirokovaG. (2019). When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of national culture. Journal of Business Research, 96, 309–321.
5.
BulloughA., KroeckK. G., NewburryW., KunduS. K., & LoweK. B. (2012). Women’s political leadership participation around the world: An institutional analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 398–411.
6.
Cabeza-GarcíaL., Del BrioE. B., & RuedaC. (2019). Legal and cultural factors as catalysts for promoting women in the boardroom. Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 56–67.
7.
ChitsikeC. (2000). Culture as a barrier to rural women’s entrepreneurship: Experience from Zimbabwe. Gender and Development, 8(1), 71–77.
8.
ChughS., & SahgalP. (2007). Why do few women advance to leadership positions?Global Business Review, 8(2), 351–365.
9.
ColeW. M. (2020). Working to protect rights: Women’s civil liberties in cross-cultural perspective. Social Science Research, 91, 102461.
10.
CullenA. U. (2019). Sociocultural factors as determinants of female entrepreneurs’ business strategies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 144–167.
11.
DavisL. S., & WilliamsonC. R. (2019). Does individualism promote gender equality?World Development, 123, 104627, 1–16.
12.
EisingaR., TeelkenC., & DoorewaardH. (2010). Assessing cross national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six country study of European University Faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44(4), 341–373.
13.
FarahzadiS., & RahmatiM. (2020). Female labor participation in Iran: A structural model estimation. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(1), 1–19.
14.
ForsbergE. (2020). Marriage and individualism—Is there a connection? Highly educated women in Stockholm in 2020(Master’s thesis). Department of Sociology, Stockholms Universitet.
15.
FriedmanE. J. (2003). Gendering the agenda: The impact of the transnational women’s rights movement at the UN conferences of the 1990s. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(4), 313–331.
16.
GlickP. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, power distance, and gender inequality across cultures. In GuimondS. (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 283–302). Cambridge University Press.
17.
Grossman-ThompsonB. H. (2019). Disposability and gendered control in labor migration: Limiting women’s mobility through cultural and institutional norms. Organization, 26(3), 337–354.
18.
GrosvoldJ. (2011). Where are all the women? Institutional context and the prevalence of women on the corporate board of directors. Business & Society, 50(3), 531–555.
19.
GyapongE., & AfrifaG. A. (2021). National culture and women managers: Evidence from microfinance institutions around the world. Business & Society, 60(6), 1387–1429.
20.
HechavarríaD. M., & IngramA. E. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions and gendered national-level entrepreneurial activity: A 14-year panel study of GEM. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 431–458.
21.
HofstedeG. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 3–26.
22.
Hofstede Insights. (2021, July1). National culture. https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture
23.
HrivíkováT. (2020). Consequences of gender conceptualizations in cultural context. Economic Review, 49(3), 318–342.
24.
HylandM., DjankovS., & GoldbergP. K. (2020). Gendered laws and women in the workforce. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(4), 475–490.
25.
KimS. Y. (2021). Determining critical factors of gender inequality: Evidence from 34 OECD and non-OECD countries. World Development Perspectives, 21, 100284.
26.
LorcaP., & AndrésJ. (2019). The importance of cultural factors in R&D intensity. Cross-Cultural Research, 53(5), 483–507.
27.
MahapatroS. (2019). Female employment in India: Determinants of choice of sector of activity. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(3), 748–759.
28.
McGrathR. G., MacMillanI. C., YangE. A., & TsaiW. (1992). Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 441–458.
29.
MillsA. J. (2002). Studying the gendering of organizational culture over time: Concerns, issues and strategies. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(3), 286–306.
30.
NaiduS., & ChandA. (2017). National culture, gender inequality and women’s success in micro, small and medium enterprises. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 647–664.
31.
OzgenE. (2012). The effect of the national culture on female entrepreneurial activities in emerging countries: An application of the GLOBE project cultural dimensions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 16, 69–92.
32.
PinesA. M., LernerM., & SchwartzD. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 29(2), 186–198.
33.
ReillyN. (2007). Linking local and global feminist advocacy: Framing women’s rights as human rights in the Republic of Ireland. Women’s Studies International Forum, 30, 114–133.
34.
SamineniS., & RameshiK. (2020). Measuring the impact of microfinance on economic enhancement of women: Analysis with special reference to India. Global Business Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920923108
35.
ShinnarR. S., GiacominO., & JanssenF. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465–493.
36.
ShneorR., Metin CamgözS., & Bayhan KarapinarP. (2013). The interaction between culture and sex in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9–10), 781–803.
37.
The World Bank. (2020a, October1). Women, business and the law 2020 report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32639/9781464815324.pdf
38.
The World Bank. (2020b, October1). Women, business and the law data. https://wbl.worldbank.org/en/wbl-data
39.
TohS. M., & LeonardelliG. J. (2012). Cultural constraints on the emergence of women as leaders. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 604–611.
40.
VershininaN., Woldesenbet BetaK. & MurithiW. (2018). How does national culture enable or constrain entrepreneurship? Exploring the role of Harambee in Kenya. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(4), 687–704.
41.
WildemanR. E., HofstedeG., NoorderhavenN. G., & ThurikA. R. (1998). Culture’s role in entrepreneurship; Self-employment out of dissatisfaction. Rotterdam Institute for Business Studies.
