Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Though we have had extensive theoretical and empirical studies on diversification during the past decades, yet the impact of diversification on a firm’s financial performance remains unclear. Earlier, authors (like Arnould, 1969; Berry, 1971; Gort, 1962) tried to answer the fundamental question of ‘whether a firm should diversify or not’, but were unable to reach any consensus. Rumelt (1974) categorized diversification into related and unrelated and concluded that diversification in a related area is better than being undiversified. Even after the seminal work of Rumelt, empirical evidence on the impact of both types of diversification on a firm’s financial performance is still mixed (Berger & Ofek, 1995; Chen & Joseph Yu, 2012; Duin & Hansen, 1991; Palepu, 1985; Palich, Cardinal, & Miller, 2000). In this study, we make an attempt to answer the same fundamental question of ‘whether a firm should diversify or not’ by including three new aspects: first, we measure the impact of diversification (and its types) on the three aspects of a firm’s financial performance, that is, risk, return and risk-adjusted return; second, we measure this impact on lag¹ of diversification; and third, we use a newly developed approach, that is, correlation-based diversification measures (Nigam & Gupta, 2018b) to measure different types of diversification. Initially, our results indicated insignificant impact of diversification (and its types) on all firm performance measures. Later, we segregated related diversification (RD) into positive related diversification (PRD) and negative related diversification (NRD); then we measured the impact of each type of diversification separately and found that diversification is better than being undiversified only if it is into a negative related area. It is a new finding and may have some policy implications for the management while designing its diversification strategy.

Keywords

Firm diversification correlation-based diversification index negative related diversification positive related diversification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnould

R. J.

(1969). Conglomerate growth and public policy. In Gordon

(Ed.), Economics of conglomerate growth (pp. 72–80). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Department of Agricultural Economics.

Berger

, & Ofek

(1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics , 37, 39–65.

Berry

(1971). Corporate growth and diversification . Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

Bettis

, & Mahajan

(1985). Risk/Return performance of diversified firms. Management Science , 31(7), 785–799.

Chandler

A. D.

(1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the History of American Enterprise . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chen

C.-J.

, & Joseph Yu

C.-M.

(2012). Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Business Review , 21(3), 115–137.

Chiao , & Ho (2009). A proposed perspective inspired by entropy on diversification, corporate performance and risk. International Journal of Organizational Innovation , 2(1), 53–69.

Cobia

, & Farris

(1969). Mergers and diversified growth of large grain firms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 51(3), 619–624.

Dewan

, & Ren

(2011). Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance. Information Systems Research , 22(2), 369–388.

10.

Duin

A. H.

, & Hansen

C. J.

(1991). Organizational computing—Implications for business communication. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 54(4), 4–6.

11.

Gort

(1962). Diversification and integration in American industry . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Herfindahl

O. C.

(1950). Concentration in the steel industry (Unpublished Dissertation). New York, NY: Columbia University.

13.

Jacquemin

, & Berry

(1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics , 27(4), 359–369.

14.

Jensen

M. C.

(1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance , 23, 389–416.

15.

Jones

G. R.

, & Hill

C. W. L.

(1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal , 9(2), 159–172.

16.

Lang

L. H. P.

, & Stulz

R. M.

(1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy , 102(6), 1248–1280.

17.

Lecraw

(1984). Diversification strategy and performance. The Journal of Industrial Economics , 33(2), 179–198.

18.

Mansi

, & Reeb

(2002). Corporate diversification: What gets discounted. The Journal of Finance , 57(5), 2167–2183.

19.

Michel

, & Shaked

(1984). Does business diversification affect performance. Financial Management , 13(4), 18–25.

20.

Nigam

N. K.

, & Gupta

C. P.

(2018a). A meta-study of the measures of corporate diversification. Business Analyst , 38(2), 62–81.

21.

Nigam

N. K.

, & Gupta

C. P.

(2018b). Correlation-based diversification and firm performance: An empirical investigation of India. Global Business Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918811232

22.

Nigam

N. K.

(2019). Impact of diversification strategy on firm’s financial performance: An empirical study of Indian firms (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, pp. 47–48). New Delhi, India: University of Delhi.

23.

Palepu

(1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal , 6(3), 239–255.

24.

Palich

, Cardinal

, & Miller

(2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal , 21(2), 155–174.

25.

Petersen

, & Rajan

(1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance , 49(1), 3–37.

26.

Porter

M. E.

(1987, May–June). From competitive advantage to competitive strategy. Harvard Business Review , 65(3), 43–59.

27.

Purkayastha

(2013). Diversification strategy and firm performance: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. Global Business Review , 14(1), 1–23.

28.

Rumelt

(1974). Strategy, structure and economic performance . Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

29.

Rumelt

(1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal , 3(4), 359–369.

30.

Rumelt

R. P.

(1977). Diversity and profitability. Paper MGL-51, Managerial studies center, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.

31.

Shyu

, & Chen

Y.-L.

(2009). Diversification, performance, and the corporate life cycle. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade , 45(6), 57–68.

32.

Teece

D. J.

(1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 3(1), 39–63.

Negative Related Diversification,Positive Related Diversification and Firm’s Performance: Measurement and Application

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References