Innovation is fundamental to the process of an economy’s growth and is crucial for its survival in today’s dynamic world. Investing in innovation, therefore, is a requisite for developing and developed countries alike. The innovation revolution has been as manifesting as the Industrial Revolution. Yet, its patterns are unevenly distributed. While some regions have witnessed a phenomenal growth in the level of patenting activity, other regions have shown a decline in the innovative output. With this backdrop, the present article analyses various institutional and macroeconomic variables that impact the level of innovation for a set of 15 Asian countries. Using two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) technique on a panel dataset for the period 2008–2017, the study examines the determinants of macroeconomic indicators on the level of innovation (as measured by the country’s patenting activity). The econometric results indicate that institutional quality, education and trade openness influence innovation favourably. Further, foreign direct investments have a negative impact on the level of innovation. A key finding of emerging from the analysis is the U-shaped relationship between financial development and innovation. Based on the results, the article concludes from a broad policy perspective.
AcemogluD., AkcigitU., & KerrW. R. (2016). Innovation network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(41), 11483–11488.
2.
AghionP., & HowittP. (2005). Growth with quality-improving innovations: An integrated framework. In AghionP., & DurlaufS. (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 67–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3.
Al-AzzawiS. (2004). Foreign direct investment and knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Department of Economics, University of California, Davis.
4.
AnokhinS., & SchulzeW. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465–476.
5.
ArellanoM., & BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
6.
ArellanoM., & BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
7.
BaltagiB. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BloomN., DracaM., & Van ReenenJ. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 87–117.
9.
BlundellR., & BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
10.
CastellacciF., & NateraJ. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579–594.
11.
CheungK.-Y., & LinP. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review, 15(1), 25–44.
12.
CireraX., & MaloneyW. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
DuttaS., ReynosoR. E., GaranasviliA., SaxenaK., LanvinB., Wunsch-VincentS., LorenaR. L., & GuadagnoF. (2018). The global innovation index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. Global Innovation Index2018, 1.
15.
DincerO. (2019). Does corruption slow down innovation? Evidence from a cointegrated panel of US states. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 1–10.
16.
EngelbrektA. B., MichalskiA., NilssonN., & OxelheimL. (Eds.), (2018). The European Union: Facing the challenge of multiple security threats. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
17.
FuX., & GongY. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: Evidence from China. World development, 39(7), 1213–1225.
18.
FuX., & YangQ. G. (2009). Exploring the cross-country gap in patenting: A stochastic frontier approach. Research Policy, 38(7), 1203–1213.
19.
FurmanJ. L., PorterM. E., & SternS. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933.
20.
GujaratiD. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
21.
HansenL. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(4), 1029–1054.
22.
Harvard Business Review. (2017 October 16). Asia: The face of innovation. Harvard business review analytic services, USA. Retrieved 15 November 2019, from https://hbr.org/sponsored/2017/10/asia-the-face-of-innovation
23.
HartonoA., & KusumawardhaniR. (2019). Innovation barriers and their impact on innovation: Evidence from Indonesian manufacturing firms. Global Business Review, 0972150918801647.
24.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271.
25.
KrammerS. M. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845–860.
26.
LawS. H., LeeW. C., & SinghN. (2018). Revisiting the finance-innovation nexus: Evidence from a non-linear approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 143–153.
27.
LeeS., NamY., LeeS., & SonH. (2016). Determinants of ICT innovations: A cross-country empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 71–77.
28.
LundvallB. Å. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.
29.
MaZ., LeeY., & ChenC. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796.
30.
MalarvizhiC. A. N., ZeynaliY., MamunA. A., & AhmadG. B. (2019). Financial development and economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries. Global Business Review, 20(1), 57–71.
31.
MarcelinI., & MathurI. (2014). Financial development, institutions and banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 31(C), 25–33.
32.
MarrB. (2018 August 13). The 4th industrial revolution is here—Are you ready? Forbes.
33.
MeierrieksD. (2014). Financial development and innovation: Is there evidence of a Schumpeterian finance-innovation nexus? Annals of Economics & Finance, 15(2), 343–363.
34.
Moudud-Ul-HuqS. (2019). The impact of business cycle on banks’ capital buffer, risk and efficiency: A dynamic GMM approach from a developing economy. Global Business Review, 0972150918817382.
35.
NamY., & BarnettG. A. (2011). Globalization of technology: Network analysis of global patents and trademarks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(8), 1471–1485.
36.
NelsonR. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press on demand.
37.
PorterM. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations: With a new introduction. New York, NY: Free Pr.
38.
Rodríguez-PoseA., & WilkieC. (2019). Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America. Growth and Change, 50(1), 4–37.
39.
RomerP. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.
40.
RoodmanD. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
41.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1939). Business cycles (Vol. 1, pp. 161–174). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
42.
SchwabK. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
43.
SolowR. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
44.
SotoM. (2009). System GMM estimation with a small sample. (UFAE and IAE Working Paper, 780.09). Barcelona, Spain: Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
45.
StiglitzJ. (1985). Credit markets and capital control. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(2), 133–152.
46.
TebaldiE., & ElmslieB. (2013). Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from cross-country patent grant data. Applied Economics, 45(7), 887–900.
47.
The World Bank. (2018). World development indicators. Online database. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
48.
United Nations. (2019). Financing for sustainable development report. New York, NY: United Nations.
49.
VarsakelisN. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity. Research Policy, 35, 1083–1090.
50.
WangC. (2013). Can institutions explain cross country differences in innovative activity? Journal of Macroeconomics, 37, 128–145.
51.
WangC., & KafourosM. I. (2009). What factors determine innovation performance in emerging economies? Evidence from China. International Business Review, 18(6), 606–616.
52.
WIPO. (2018). World intellectual property indicators 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.
