This article examines the causality between export expansion and economic growth in Myanmar using annual time series data for the period from 1981 to 2015. We use the Johansen cointegration test and the Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality test to examine the export-led growth hypothesis in Myanmar. The results show that there is a uni-directional causality running from export expansion to economic growth in Myanmar. Our results support the export-led growth hypothesis in Myanmar. This finding is very important because it indicates that exports are an important factor to promote economic growth. Economic growth can be generated not only by increasing the amounts of labour and capital within the country but also by expanding exports. Exports can perform as an ‘engine of growth’ in Myanmar as in the case of East Asian economies. Therefore, the Myanmar government should actively promote an export expansion strategy to stimulate economic growth by improving trade liberalization and trade facilitation while reducing tariffs and eliminating non-tariff barriers.
Abu-QarnA. S.Abu-BaderS. (2004). The validity of the ELG hypothesis in the MENA region: Cointegration and error correction model analysis. Applied Economics, 36(15), 1685–1695.
2.
AfzalM.HussainI. (2010). Export-led growth hypothesis: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8(1), 130–147.
3.
Al-AssafG.Al-AbdulrazagB. (2015). The validity of export-led growth hypothesis for Jordan: A bounds testing approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 199–211.
4.
AnwarA. (2014). Testing export-led growth paradigm for Pakistan’s agriculture sector. Journal of Business & Economics, 6(1), 113–126.
5.
AwokuseT. O. (2003). Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada? Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(1), 126–136.
6.
AwokuseT. O. (2005). Exports, economic growth and causality in Korea. Applied Economics Letters, 12(11), 693–696.
7.
AwokuseT. O. (2006). Export-led growth and the Japanese economy: Evidence from VAR and directed acyclic graphs. Applied Economics, 38(5), 593–602.
8.
AwokuseT. O. (2008). Trade openness and economic growth: Is growth export-led or import-led? Applied Economics, 40(2), 161–173.
9.
BalassaB. (1978). Exports and economic growth further evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 5(2), 181–189.
10.
BalcilarM.OzdemirZ. A. (2013). The export-output growth nexus in Japan: A bootstrap rolling window approach. Empirical Economics, 44(2), 639–660.
11.
BongA.PremaratneG. (2018). Regional integration and economic growth in Southeast Asia. Global Business Review, 19(6), 1403–1415.
12.
CaporaleG. M.PittisN. (1999). Efficient estimation of cointegrating vectors and testing for causality in vector autoregressions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(1), 1–35.
13.
ChaudharyA. R.IqbalA.GillaniS. Y. M. (2009). The nexus between higher education and economic growth: An empirical investigation for Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–9.
14.
ChiaY. E. (2016). Export-led growth hypothesis: Empirical evidence from selected Sub-Saharan African countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 232–240.
15.
ChowP. C. Y. (1987). Causality between export growth and industrial development empirical evidence from the NICs. Journal of Development Economics, 26(1), 55–63.
16.
CoeT.HelpmanE. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859–887.
17.
CordenW. M.NearyS. P. (1982). Booming sector and deindustrialisation in a small open economy. Economic Journal, 99, 426–442.
18.
DashR. K. (2009). Revisited export-led growth hypothesis: An empirical study on India. South Asia Economic Journal, 10(2), 305–324.
19.
DhawanU.BiswalB. (1999). Re-examining export-led growth hypothesis: A multivariate cointegration analysis for India. Applied Economics, 31(4), 525–539.
20.
DollarD.KraayA. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), 22–49.
21.
EeC. Y. (2016). Export-led growth hypothesis: Empirical evidence from selected Sub-Saharan African countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 232–240.
22.
EngleR. F.GrangerC. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
23.
FooksJ. R.DundasS. J.AwokuseT. O. (2013). Are there efficiency gains from the removal of natural resource export restrictions? Evidence from British Columbia. The World Economy, 36(8), 1098–1114.
24.
GilesJ. A.MirzaS. (1998). Some pretesting issues on testing for Granger non-causality (Econometric Working Papers No. 9914). Canada, CA: Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
25.
GilesJ. A., (1999). Some pretesting issues on testing for Granger noncausality. Econometrics Working Paper EWP 9914, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
26.
HabiyaremyeA. (2013). Imported capital goods and manufacturing productivity: Evidence from Botswana’s manufacturing sector. South African Journal of Economics, 81(4), 581–604.
27.
HeD.ZhangW. (2010). How dependent is the Chinese economy on exports and in what sense has its growth been export-led? Journal of Asian Economics, 21(1), 87–104.
28.
HenriquesI.SadorskyP. (1996). Export-led growth or growth-driven exports? The Canadian case. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(3), 540–555.
29.
HerreriasM. J.OrtsV. (2010). Is the export-led growth hypothesis enough to account for China’s growth? China & World Economy, 18(4), 34–51.
30.
HuangT. H.WangM. H. (2007). A test for the export-led growth hypothesis in possibly integrated vector autoregressions. Applied Economics Letters, 14(13), 999–1003.
31.
IslamF.HeyQ. M. A.ShahbazM. (2012). Import-economic growth nexus: ARDL approach to cointegration. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 5(3), 194–214.
32.
JinJ. C. (2009). Economic research and economic growth: Evidence from East Asian economies. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(2), 150–155.
33.
JohansenS. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.
34.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
35.
JungW. S.MarshallP. J. (1985). Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 18(1), 1–12.
36.
KimS.LimH.ParkD. (2009). Imports, exports and total factor productivity in Korea. Applied Economics, 41(14), 1819–1834.
37.
KuboK. (2011). Natural gas export revenue, fiscal balance and inflation in Myanmar. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 28(3), 374–387.
38.
KudoT. (2006). Myanmar’s economic relations with China: Can China support the Myanmar economy? (IDE Discussion Paper No. 66, pp. 1–29). Chiba: IDE, JETRO.
39.
KudoT.MienoF. (2007). Trade, foreign investment and Myanmar’s economic development during the transition to an open economy (IDE Discussion Paper No. 116, pp. 1–33). Chiba: IDE, JETRO.
40.
KwanA. C. C.KwokB. (1995). Exogeneity and the export-led growth hypothesis: The case of China. Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 1158–1166.
41.
LiuX.ShuC.SinclairP. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Asian economies. Applied Economics, 41(13), 1603–1612.
42.
MahJ. S. (2005). Export expansion, economic growth and causality in China. Applied Economics Letters, 12(2), 105–107.
43.
MahadevanR. (2007). New evidence on the export-led growth nexus: A case study of Malaysia. The World Economy, 30(7), 1069–1083.
44.
MamunK. A. A.NathH. K. (2005). Export-led growth in Bangladesh: A time series analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 12(6), 361–364.
45.
Medina-SmithE. J. (2001). Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for developing countries? A case study of Costa Rica. Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 7, UNCTAD, United Nations Publication.
46.
Ministry of Planning and Finance. (2017). An analysis of poverty in Myanmar (Part 02 poverty profile). The World Bank.
47.
MyintU. (2010). Myanmar economy a comparative view. Stockholm: Institute for Security and Development Policy.
48.
MyintM. M.RasiahR. (2012). Foreign capital and garment export from Myanmar: Implications for the labour process. Institutions and Economics, 4(3), 151–172.
49.
NarayanP. K.SmythR. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2331–2341.
50.
OxleyL. (1993). Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Portugal, 1865–1985. Economics Letters, 43(2), 163–166.
51.
PanasE.VamvoukasG. (2002). Further evidence on the export-led growth hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters, 9(11), 731–735.
52.
PerronP. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401.
53.
RamR. (1985). Exports and economic growth: Some additional evidence. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 415–425.
54.
RasiahR.MyintM. M. (2013). Ownership, technological capabilities and exports of garment firms in Myanmar. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), 22–42.
55.
RibeiroA. P.CarvalhoV.SantosP. (2016). Export-led growth in the EU: Where and what to export? The International Trade Journal, 30(4), 319–344.
56.
RoemerM. (1979). Resource-based industrialisation: A survey. Journal of Development Economics, 6(6), 163–202.
57.
SachsJ.WarnerW. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (Discussion Paper No. 517a). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.
58.
ShanJ.SunF. (1998a). Export-led growth hypothesis for Australia: An empirical re-investigation. Applied Economics Letters, 5(7), 423–428.
59.
ShanJ.SunF. (1998b). On the export-led growth hypothesis for the little dragons: An empirical reinvestigation. Atlantic Economic Journal, 26(4), 353–371.
60.
ShanJ.TianG. G. (1998). Causality between exports and economic growth: The empirical evidence from Shanghai. Australian Economic Papers, 37(2), 195–202.
61.
ShiraziN. S.Abdul ManapT. A. (2005). Export-led growth hypothesis: Further econometric evidence from South Asia. The Developing Economies, 43(4), 472–488.
SoeT. (2008). Policy dilemmas and economic development: A case study of Myanmar economy in transition. Journal of International Cooperation Studies, 15(3), 1–30.
64.
TangC. F.LaiY. W.OzturkI. (2015). How stable is the export-led growth hypothesis? Evidence from Asia’s Four Little Dragons. Economic Modelling, 44, 229–235.
65.
The World Bank. (2016). Opening for business: Myanmar Diagnostic Trade Integration Study. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
66.
ThorntonJ. (1996). Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Mexico, 1895–1992. Economics Letters, 50(3), 413–416.
67.
TodaH. Y.YamamotoT. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.
68.
TodaroM. P. (1997). Economic development. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
69.
WasimM. P. (2003). Export instability and economic growth in Pakistan. Global Business Review, 4(2), 271–283.
70.
ZangW.BaimbridgeM. (2012). Exports, imports and economic growth in South Korea and Japan: A tale of two economies. Applied Economics, 44(3), 361–372.
71.
ZapataH. O.RambaldiA. N. (1997). Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59(2), 285–298.
72.
ZivotE.AndrewsD. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.
