This study attempts to measure the fiscal multipliers in India using the state-level panel dataset of 17 non-special category states for the period 2001–2002 to 2013–2014. The study employs the panel vector autoregression (PVAR) approach with a generalized method of moments (GMM) framework and plots the generalized impulse response function to explore shocks and responses of endogenous variables. The article finds that the effects of fiscal variables on income in longer horizon are greater than the immediate impact. Both in the short run and long run, the multiplier effect of capital outlay on income is greater than the multiplier effect of revenue expenditure. The operation of reverse multiplier due to increase in tax is found to be lower than the favourable multiplier effect of expenditure. It provides a rationale for taxation wherein the government should resort to taxation with an objective to spend it on productive investment and thereby raise the economic activity.
AbrigoM. R.LoveI. (2015). Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata: A package of programs. Retrieved from http://paneldataconference2015.ceu.hu/Program/Michael-Abrigo.pdf
2.
AndrewsD. W. K.LuB. (2001). Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 101(1), 123–164.
3.
ArellanoM.BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
4.
AuerbachJ.GorodnichenkoY. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1–27.
5.
BarroR. J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of Political Economy, 89(6), 1086–1121.
6.
BarroR. J. (2009, January 22). Government spending is no free lunch. Wall Street Journal, A.17.
7.
BatiniN.EyraudL.ForniL.WeberA. (2014). Fiscal multipliers: Size, determinants, and use in macroeconomic projections(Technical Notes and Manuals Fiscal Affairs Department). Washington, DC: IMF.
8.
BlanchardO.PerottiR. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329–1368.
9.
BoseS.BhanumurthyN. R. (2015). Fiscal multipliers for India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9(4), 379–401.
10.
EichenbaumM.FisherJ. D. M. (2005). Fiscal policy in the aftermath of 9/11. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(1), 1–22.
11.
EricksonC. A.Owusu-NantwiV.Owensby. (2015). The government spending multiplier: Evidence from county level data. The Social Science Journal, 52(3), 358–363.
12.
EspinozaR.SenhadjiA. (2011). How strong are fiscal multipliers in the GCC? An empirical investigation(IMF Working Paper No. 11/61). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
13.
GordonR. J.KrennR. (2010). The end of the great depression: VAR Insight on the roles of monetary and fiscal policy(NBER Working Paper No. 16380). National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts Avenue: Cambridge.
14.
GuimaraesR. (2010). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks in India. Retrieved from http://macrofinance.nipfp.org.in/PDF/06_6Pr_Guimaraes_Fiscal%20Multipliers%20in%20India_2010_Conference.pdf
15.
GuoQ.ChangL.MaG. (2016). How large is the local fiscal multiplier? Evidence from Chinese counties. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(2), 343–352.
16.
HoryM.-P. (2015). Fiscal multipliers in emerging market economies: Can we learn something from advanced economies? International Economics. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.11.002
17.
IlzetzkiE.MendozaE. G.VéghC.A. (2011, March). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers?(IMF Working Paper, WP1152). Washington, D.C.
18.
IMF. (2012). Fiscal Monitor: Balancing fiscal policy risks. In World economic and financial surveys under the supervision of Carlo Cottarelli and Philip Gerson, Washington D.C., International Monetary Fund.
19.
JainR.KumarP. (2013). Size of government expenditure multipliers in India: A structural VAR analysis(RBI Working Paper Series 7). Mumbai, India: Reserve Bank of India.
20.
KahnR. F. (1931). The relation of home investment to unemployment. The Economic Journal, 41(162), 173–198.
21.
KeynesJ. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money(Book III, Chapter 10). London, UK: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.
22.
KoopG.PesaranM. H.PotterS. M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 119–147.
23.
KulkarniK. G.SaxenaS. C. (2003). Have the monetary and fiscal policies been effective in India? Global Business Review, 4(2), 229–237.
24.
LeeperE. M.WalkerT. B.YangS.-C. S. (2011). Foresight and information flows(NBER Working Paper-16951). National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts Avenue: Cambridge.
25.
MertensK.RavnM. O. (2011). Understanding the aggregate effects of anticipated and unanticipated tax policy shocks. Review of Economic Dynamics, 14(1), 27–54.
26.
MountfordA.UhligH. (2009). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(6), 960–992.
27.
PesaranH. H.ShinY. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17–29.
28.
RameyV. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 673–685.
29.
RameyV. A.ShapiroM. D. (1998). Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48, 145–194.
30.
RaoC. B.SrivastavaD. K. (2014). Dependence of states on central transfers: State-wise analysis. Global Business Review, 15(14), 695–717.
31.
RomerC.BernsteinJ. (2009). The job impact of the American recovery and reinvestment plan. USA: Council of Economic Advisers.
32.
RomerC. D.RomerD. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), 763–801.
33.
SpilimbergoA.SymanskyS.SchindlerM. (2009). Fiscal multipliers(IMF Staff Position Note, SPN/09/11). Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
34.
YadavS.UpadhyayV.SharmaS. (2012). Impact of fiscal policy shocks on the Indian economy. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 6(4), 415–444.
