Most of major shareholders, known as promoters of the firms, are subject to lock-up ratio for a certain period, following their company’s IPO listing. Interestingly, the lock-up ratio among firms vary, suggesting that it serves as a signalling tool to minimize potential conflicts between insiders and uninformed investors. This article investigates the influence of two main factors, that is, underwriter reputation and market capitalization on lock-up ratios. The regression results show that market capitalization, a proxy for firm size, tends to have a positive impact on lock-up ratio while the effect of underwriters’ reputation is weak. The findings also indicate that large firms with quality underwriters (proxied using the interaction of market capitalization and underwriter reputation) have lower information asymmetry and risk, and, therefore, are associated with higher lock-up ratios.
Abdul-RahimR., & YongO. (2010). Initial returns of Malaysian IPOs and shari’a-compliant status. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1(1), 60–74.
2.
AgarwalS., LiuC., & RheeS. G. (2008). Investor demand for IPOs and aftermarket performance: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 176–190.
3.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
4.
AllenF., & FaulhaberG. R. (1988). Optimism invites deception. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(2), 397–407.
5.
ArthursJ. D., BusenitzL. W., HoskissonR. E., & JohnsonR. A. (2009). Signaling and initial public offerings: The use and impact of the lockup period. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 360–372.
6.
BansalR., & KhannaA. (2013). Vector auto-regressive analysis of determinants of IPO underpricing: Empirical evidence from bombay stock exchange. Global Business Review, 14(4), 651–689.
7.
BarclayM. J., & CliffordW.SmithJ. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 609–631.
8.
BarryC. B., MuscarellaC. J., PeavyJ. W., & VetsuypensM. R. (1990). The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies: Evidence from the going-public process. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 447–471.
9.
BeattyR. P., & RitterJ. R. (1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232.
10.
BradleyD. J., & JordanB. D. (2002). Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(4), 595–616.
11.
BradleyD. J., JordanB. D., RotenI. C., & YiH.-C. (2001). Venture capital and IPO lockup expiration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Research, 24(4), 465–493.
12.
BrauJ. C., CarterD. A., ChristopheS. E., & KeyK. G. (2004). Market reaction to the expiration of IPO lockup provisions. Managerial Finance, 30(1), 75–91.
13.
BrauJ. C., LambsonV. E., & McQueenG. (2005). Lockups revisited. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(3), 519–530.
14.
BravA., & GompersP. A. (2003). The role of lockups in initial public offerings. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(1), 1–29.
15.
CarterR., & ManasterS. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067.
16.
Che YahyaN., Abdul-RahimR., & YongO. (2013). Influence of lockup provision on flipping activity of Malaysian IPOs. Economics and Finance Review, 3(4), 11–24.
17.
CourteauL. (1995). Under-diversification and retention commitments in IPOs. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30(4), 487–517.
18.
EldomiatyT. I. (2008). Determinants of corporate capital structure: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(1), 25–43.
19.
EspenlaubS., & TonksI. (1998). Post-IPO directors’ sales and reissuing activity: An empirical test of IPO signalling models. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(9–10), 1037–1079.
20.
GoergenM., RenneboogL., & KhurshedA. (2006). Explaining the diversity in shareholder lockup agreements. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15(2), 254–280.
21.
GounopoulosD., NounisC. P., & StylianidesP. (2007). The short and long term performance of initial public offerings in the Cyprus Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Decision Making, 4(1), 33–51.
22.
GrinblattM., & HwangC. Y. (1989). Signalling and the pricing of new issues. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), 393–420.
23.
JainB. A., & KiniO. (1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1699–1726.
24.
JelicR., SaadouniB., & BristonR. (2001). Performance of Malaysian IPOs: Underwriters reputation and management earnings forecasts. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(5), 457–486.
25.
LelandH. E., & PyleD. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.
26.
Mohd RashidR., Abdul-RahimR., & YongO. (2014). The influence of lock-up provisions on IPO initial returns: Evidence from an emerging market. Economic Systems, 38(4), 487–501.
27.
Mohd RashidR., Abdul-RahimR., YongO., & NorA. M. (2013). Lock-up provision and performance of IPOs: Effect of information asymmetry. In Recent trend in social and behaviour sciences (pp. 129–134). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
28.
PrasadD., VozikisG. S., BrutonG. D., & MerikasA. (1995). Harvesting through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): The implications of underpricing for the small firm. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 20(2), 31–41.
29.
RitterJ. R., & WelchI. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.
30.
RockK. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212.
31.
SandersW. G., & BoivieS. (2004). Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 167–186.
32.
TajuddinA. H., Mohd-RashidR., AbdullahN. A. H., & Abdul-RahimR. (2015). An empirical examination of over-subscription in the Malaysian IPO market. International Journal of Economics and Management, 9, 81–102.
33.
Wan-HussinW. N. (2005). The effects of owners’ participation and lockup on IPO underpricing in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 10(1), 19–36.
34.
WelchI. (1989). Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), 421–449.
35.
WongW.-C., OngS.-E., & OoiJ. (2013). Sponsor backing in Asian REIT IPOs. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 46, 299–320.
36.
YungC., & ZenderJ. F. (2010). Moral hazard, asymmetric information and IPO lockups. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(3), 320–332.
37.
ZhengS. X., OgdenJ. P., & JenF. C. (2005). Pursuing value through liquidity in IPOs: Underpricing, share retention, lockup, and trading volume relationships. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 25(3), 293–312.
38.
ZhengS. X., & StangelandD. A. (2007). IPO underpricing, firm quality, and analyst forecasts. Financial Management, 36(2), 1–20.
