Impact of Internet Adoption and Mobile Phone Penetration on Corruption: Evidence from Selected Asia-Paciﬁc Countries

Abstract

This study uses the mobile phone penetration as a tool of accountability against corruption and promotes transparency and good governance among selected Asia-Pacific countries. The consensus regarding fast internet speed plays a vital role to eliminate the corruption through modern informational and communication technology system. This study empirically investigates the causal relationship between internet adoption and mobile phone penetration to overcome the issue of corruption. This study adopted the Granger causality approach to analyse the panel data (2006–2016) for 12 countries. The results of Granger causality test did not find any evidence for bidirectional causality from corruption to mobile phone penetration and internet adoption. This shows that an increase in mobile phone penetration and internet adoption leads to decrease in corruption. The good governance and rule of law also found the powerful instruments to reduce the perceived corruption. This study is the first ever attempt to examine this issue for Asian Pacific countries, while other studies include only developing and advanced economies in their sample.

Keywords

Internet mobile phone corruption Granger causality test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alt

J. E.

& Lassen

D. D.

(2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341–365.

Andersen

T. B.

(2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210.

Arellano

& Bond

(1991). Some tests of speciﬁcation for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

Arellano

& Bover

(1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

Asongu

S. A.

& Nwachukwu

J. C.

(2016). The mobile phone in the diffusion of knowledge for institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 86, 133–147.

Bailard

C. S.

(2009). Mobile phone diffusion and corruption in Africa. Political Communication, 26(3), 333–353.

Baltagi

(2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Bertot

J. C.

Jaeger

P. T.

& Grimes

J. M.

(2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

Besley

& Prat

(2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? The role of the media in political accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736.

10.

Bhattacharyya

& Hodler

(2010). Natural resources, democracy, and corruption. European Economic Review, 54(4), 608–621.

11.

Blundell

& Bond

(1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

12.

Charoensukmongkol

& Moqbel

(2014). Does investment in ICT curb or create more corruption? A cross-country analysis. Public Organization Review, 14(1), 51–63.

13.

CNN (2012). Central news Network published crime report.

14.

Elbahnasawy

N. G.

(2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005

15.

Elbahnasawy

N. G.

& Revier

C. F.

(2012). The determinants of corruption: Cross-country-panel-data analysis. The Developing Economies, 50(4), 311–333.

16.

Falola

& Achberger

(Eds.). (2013). The political economy of development and underdevelopment in Africa. Routledge.

17.

Fisman

& Gatti

(2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345.

18.

Freille

Haque

M. E.

& Kneller

(2007). A contribution to the empirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 838–862.

19.

Garcia-Murillo

(2013). Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption?. Information Technology for Development, 19(2), 151–175.

20.

Goel

Wobbrock

& Patel

(2012, October). GripSense: using built-in sensors to detect hand posture and pressure on commodity mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 545–554). ACM.

21.

Granger

C. W.

(1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37, 424–438.

22.

Greene

W. H.

(2008). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In Fried

H. O.

Knox Lovell

C. A.

& Schmidt

S. S.

(Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (pp. 92–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Heeks

(1998). Information technology and public sector corruption. Manchester, UK: Institute for Development Policy and Management.

24.

Huntington

S. P.

(2006). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

25.

Isham

Woolcock

Pritchett

& Busby

(2005). The varieties of resource experience: Natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 141–174.

26.

Jain

A. K.

(2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.

27.

Kalenborn

& Lessmann

(2013). The impact of democracy and press freedom on corruption: Conditionality matters. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6), 857–886.

28.

Kanyam

Daniel

G. K.

& Susana

(2017). The mobile phone revolution: Have mobile phones and the internet reduced corruption in sub-Saharan Africa? World Development, 99, 271–284.

29.

Kaufmann

Kraay

& Mastruzzi

(2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

30.

Kolstad

& Wiig

(2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532.

31.

Koyuncu

& Bhattacharyya

(2007). Predicting Corrupt Practices in the Public Sector for 23 OECD Countries. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 7(1).

32.

Leff

N. H.

(1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.

33.

Lio

Liu

& Ou

(2011). Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 47–53.

34.

Mauro

(2004). The persistence of corruption and slow economic growth. IMF Staff Papers, 51(1), 1–18.

35.

Mishra

(2006). Persistence of corruption: Some theoretical perspectives. World Development, 34(2), 349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.010

36.

Mundlak

(1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(1), 69–85.

37.

Nickell

(1981). Biases in dynamic models with ﬁxed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49, 1417–1426.

38.

Owoseni

& Twinomurinzi

(2018). The dynamic capabilities of small and medium-scale enterprises using mobile apps in Lagos, Nigeria. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 85(1), e12061.

39.

Petermann

Guzman

J. I.

& Tilton

J. E.

(2007). Mining and corruption. Resources Policy, 32(3), 91–103.

40.

Seldadyo

& De Haan

(2005). The determinants of corruption. The Economist, 66, 1–60.

41.

Serra

(2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1–2), 225–256.

42.

Shabbir

M. S.

(2015). Innovation and competitiveness lead to industrial trade. Business and Economic Journal, 6(181), 2.

43.

Shabbir

M. S.

Ghazi

M. S.

& Mehmood

A. R.

(2017). Impact of social media applications on small business entrepreneurs. Management and Economics Research Journal, 2(2016), 605.

44.

Shim

D. C.

& Eom

T. H.

(2009). Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International review of administrative sciences, 75(1), 99–116.

45.

Shleifer

& Vishny

R. W.

(1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.

46.

The World Bank (2016). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/all

47.

Topal

M. H.

& Unver

(2016). Determinants of Corruption: Panel Co-integration Analysis for Fragile Economies. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Social Sciences, 2(2), 58–68.

48.

Treisman

(2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.

49.

Treisman

(2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244.

50.

Türedi

& Altıner

(2016). Economic and Political Factors Affecting Corruption in Developing Countries. International Journal of Economic Research, 7(1), 104–120.

51.

United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2014). Mobile phones helping to fight corruption in Papua New Guinea. Retrieved from http://www.pg.undp.org/content/papua_new_guinea/en/home/ourwork/democraticgovernance/successstories/fighting-corruption-using-mobilephones-.html

52.

United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2016). Mobile phones helping to fight corruption in Papua New Guinea. Retrieved from http://www.asia-pacific.undp.org/content/rbap/en/home/ourwork/development-impact/innovation/projects/png-phone-against-corruption.html

53.

United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2017). UNDP Global Anti-Corruption Initiative (GAIN) (2014–2017). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/anti-corruption/undp-global-anti-corruption-initiative--gain--2014-2017.html

54.

Windmeijer

(2005). A ﬁnite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51.

55.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2011). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.