User-generated content (UGC) forms an indispensable part of virtual community (VC) based on marketing. It not only makes the community information-rich, but is also instrumental in generating more interactions on the community platform, involving more number of members, both actively and passively. With this backdrop, the present study aims to explore active participation (AP) of members in a VC, which leads to the creation of UGC for the community. Social media (SM) use being context dependent, the main objective of this article is to study the role of VC benefits in inducing AP among users in the Indian context. The mediating role of member’s satisfaction with the community in the above relationship is also explored. The proposed model is tested on a convenience sample of 170 SM users using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results indicate that of the three benefit categories, selected, social and hedonic benefits, play an important role in inducing AP among community members. A bootstrap analysis is performed to check for mediation, wherein satisfaction is found to partially mediate the relationship between social benefits and AP, and indirect mediation is established between hedonic benefits and AP. The study offers useful insights to community managers, so as to strategically design their community content creating satisfied users and inducing AP.
AlgesheimerR.DholakiaU. M. & HerrmannA. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34.
2.
BhardwajN. & VohraA. (2015). Virtual communities on social networks & the Indian consumer: A netnographic study. Paper presented at the 6th IIMA Conference on Marketing in Emerging Economies, IIM, Ahmedabad.
3.
CasaloL. V.FlavianC. & GuinaliuM. (2008). The role of satisfaction and website usability in developing customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth in the e-banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(6), 399–417.
4.
CasaloL. V.FlavianC. & GuinaliuM. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of consumer participation in on-line communities: The case of the travel sector. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 137–167.
5.
ChanK. W. & LiS. Y. (2010). Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1033–1040.
6.
ChangA.HsiehS. H. & LinF. (2013). Personality traits that lead members of online brand communities to participate in information sending and receiving. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(3), 37–61.
7.
ChenA.LuY.WangB.ZhaoL. & LiM. (2013). What drives content creation behaviour on SNSs? A commitment perspective. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2529–2535.
8.
CheungC. M. & LeeM. K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279–298.
9.
CheungC. M. & LeeM. K. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks. Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 24–30.
10.
ChowW. S. & ShiS. (2015). Investigating customers’ satisfaction with brand pages in social networking sites. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(2), 48–58.
11.
De ValckK.LangerakF.VerhoefP. C. & VerleghP. (2007). Satisfaction with virtual communities of interest: Effect on members’ visit frequency. British Journal of Management, 18(3), 241–256.
12.
DholakiaU. M.BagozziR. P. & PearoL. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.
13.
DholakiaU. M.BlazevicV.WiertzC. & AlgesheimerR. (2009). Communal service delivery: How customers benefit from participation in firm-hosted virtual P3 communities. Journal of Service Research, 12(2), 208–226.
14.
FornellC. & LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra & statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.
15.
GummerusJ.LiljanderV.WemanE. & PihlstromM. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9), 857–877.
16.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J. & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
17.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J. & AndersonR. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Henning-ThurauT.GwinnerK. P.WalshG. & GremlerD. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
19.
KabadayiS. & PriceK. (2014). Consumer-brand engagement on Facebbok: liking and commenting behaviors. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(3), 203–223.
20.
KangJ.TangL. & FioreA. M. (2014). Enhancing consumer-brand relationships on restaurant Facebook fan pages: Maxmizing consumer benefits and increasing active participation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36(1), 145–155.
21.
KimJ. W. (2014). Scan and click: The uses and gratifications of social recommendation systems. Computers in Human Behaviour, 33, 184–191.
22.
KimY. H.KimD. J. & WachterK. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 361–370.
23.
LaiH.-M. & ChenT. T. (2014). Knowledge sharing in interest online communities: A comparison of posters and lurkers. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 295–306.
24.
LarocheM.HabibiM. R. & RichardM.-O. (2013). To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media?International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 76–82.
25.
LiD.BrowneG. J. & WetherbeJ. C. (2006). Why do internet users stick with a specific website? A relationship perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(4), 105–141.
26.
MannB. S. & SahniS. K. (2011). Inter-relationship of web site interactivity and customer outcomes: Building trust in internet banking web site. Global Business Review, 12(1), 99–115.
27.
NambisanS. & BaronR. A. (2007). Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 42–62.
28.
NambisanS. & BaronR. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 388–406.
29.
O’BrienH. L. (2010). The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 344–352.
30.
OlaniranB. A. (1996). A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(1), 24–36.
31.
PaekH.-J.HoveT.JungY. & ColeR. T. (2013). Engagement across three social media platforms: An exploratory study of a cause-related PR campaign. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 526–533.
32.
ParkH. & KimY.-K. (2014). The role of social netwrok websites in the consumer-brand relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 460–467.
33.
PorterC. E.DonthuN.MacElRoyW. & WydraD. (2011). How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. California Management Review, 53(4), 80–110.
34.
RoyS. K. (2008). Determining uses and gratifications for Indian internet users. In Case studies in business, industry and government statistics (pp. 78–91). Waltham, MA: Bentley University.
35.
Royo-VelaM. & CasamassimaP. (2011). The influence of belonging to virtual brand communities on consumers’ affective commitment, satisfaction and word-of-mouth advertising: The ZARA case. Online Information Review, 35(4), 517–542.
36.
SmockA. D.EllisonN. B.LampeC. & WohnD. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329.
37.
TonteriL.KosonenM.EllonenH.-K. & TarkiainenA. (2011). Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(6), 2215–2223.
38.
TsaiH.-T. & PaiP. (2013). Explaining members’ proactive participation in virtual communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(4), 475–491.
39.
VerhagenT.FeldbergF.HooffB. V.MeentsS. & MerikiviJ. (2012). Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 484–495.
40.
VivekS. D.BeattyS. E. & MorganR. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 127–145.
41.
WangY. & FesenmaierD. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tourism Management, 25(6), 709–722.
42.
WuJ.-J.ChenY.-H. & ChungY.-S. (2010). Trust factors influencing virtual community members: A study of transaction communities. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1025–1032.
