Investigating the Demographics and Behavioural Characteristics Associated with Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyles in a Developed and a Developing Country: A Comparison between US and Turkish Simplifiers
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
Investigating the Demographics and Behavioural Characteristics Associated with Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyles in a Developed and a Developing Country: A Comparison between US and Turkish Simplifiers
This study aims to compare the demographics and behavioural characteristics of consumers who adopt voluntary simplicity as a daily lifestyle process, focusing on one developed country and one developing country. Data were accordingly collected from 589 US and Turkish consumers who define themselves as voluntary simplifiers. Although other studies found that voluntary simplifiers have same demographic characteristics, our results indicate that Turkish and US simplifiers do not vary statistically in terms of demographic variables such as income class, marital status, number of children and gender but do vary statistically in terms of education, age and working hours. They also vary in terms of the deliberate shortening of working hours. The results reveal that several behavioural and demographic characteristics of consumers who adopt the same lifestyle philosophy may vary based on their culture and the conditions of their country. Findings in the discussion section are aligned with previous studies in the literature and with socioeconomic and demographic indicators of the two countries.
AlexanderS. & UssherS. (2012). Voluntary simplicity movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66–86.
2.
AydoğanF. (2009). Tüketim kültürünün gölgesinde kentler. MU Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 203–215.
3.
BallantineP. W. & CreeryS. (2010). The consumption and disposition behaviour of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(1), 45–56.
4.
BekinC.CarriganM. & SzmiginI. (2005). Defying marketing sovereignty: Voluntary simplicity at new consumption communitiesQualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 413–429.
5.
BerkmanH. W. & GilsonC. C. (1974). Consumer life styles and market segmentation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2(1), 189–200.
6.
BrownK. W. & KasserT. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368.
7.
ChatzidakisA. & LeeM. S. (2013). Anti-consumption as the study of reasons against. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(3), 190–203.
8.
CherrierH. (2009) Disposal and simple living: Exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(6), 327–339.
9.
ChinW. W. & DibbernJ. (2009). A permutation based procedure for multi-group (PLS) analysis: Results of tests of practices on simulated data. In VinziV. EspositoChinW. W.HenselerJ. & WangH. (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Heidelberg: Springer.
10.
CowlesD. & CrosbyL. A. (1986). Measure validation in consumer research: A confirmatory factor analysis of the voluntary simplicity lifestyle scale. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 392–397.
DelheyJ. (2010). From materialist to post-materialist happiness? National affluence and determinants of life satisfaction in cross-national perspective. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 65–84.
13.
ElginD. (1981). Voluntary simplicity: Toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.
14.
ElginD. (1993). Voluntary simplicity: Toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich. New York, NY: Quill.
EtzioniA. (1998). Voluntary simplicity, characterization, select psychological implications, and societal, consequences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(5), 619–643.
17.
GrisbyM. (2004). Buying time and getting by: The voluntary simplicity movement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
GreggR. (1936). The value of voluntary simplicity. Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill.
19.
HullandJ. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.
20.
HunekeM. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.
21.
IwataO. (2006). An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(5), 557–568.
22.
IyerR. & MuncyJ. A. (2008). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168.
23.
KaynakE.KaraA. & UnusanC. (1998). Product-country images (PCI) in an advanced developing country. Journal of Euro-Marketing, 1, 51–66.
24.
Leonard-BartonD. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243–252.
25.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.
MonopolisA. N. (2010). Voluntary simplicity, authentic happiness, and ecological sustainability: An empirical psychological analysis of deliberate reductions in consumption and the cultivation of intrinsic values on subjective well-being in addition to a conceptual exploration regarding the impact of individual simplicity and socio-economic localization on global ecological sustainability (Doctoral Dissertation). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
28.
NelsonM. R.RademacherM. A. & PaekH. J. (2007). Downshifting consumer upshifting citizen? An examination of a local freecycle community. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 141–156.
29.
NolenT. P. & ClawsonB. (1995). Choosing voluntary simplicity as a lifestyle. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 13(2), 62–76.
30.
PierceL. B. (2000). Choosing simplicity: Real people finding peace and fulfillment in a complex world. Carmel, CA: Gallagher Press.
31.
RehmanV. (2017). Looking through the Glass of Indian Culture: Consumer behaviour in modern and postmodern era. Global Business Review, 18(3S), 1–18.
32.
RichinsM. L. & DawsonS. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(December), 303–316.
33.
RoubanisJ. L. (2008). Comparison of environmentally responsible consumerism and voluntary simplicity lifestyle between US and Japanese female college students. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 37(2), 210–218.
34.
SchorJ. B. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting and the new consumer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
ShamaA. & WisenblitJ. (1984). Values of voluntary simplicity: Lifestyle and motivation. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 231–240.
36.
ShawD. & NewholmT. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.
37.
VealA. J. (1993). The concept of lifestyle: A review. Leisure Studies, 12(4), 233–252.
38.
WahlenS. & LaamanenM. (2015). Consumption, lifestyle and social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 397–403.
39.
WaltherC. S. & SandlinJ. A. (2013). Green capital and social reproduction within families practising voluntary simplicity in the US. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(1), 36–45.
40.
UddinS. F. & KhanM. N. (2016). Green purchasing behaviour of young Indian consumers: An exploratory study. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1469–1479.
41.
YoungW.HwangK.McDonaldS. & OatesC. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable development, 18(1), 20–31.
42.
ZavestoskiS. (2002). The social–psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.
