The current study contributes to the existing literature on the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and social performance (SP) of microfinance institutions (MFIs) by introducing CG index for the first time purely in the perspective of Asian MFIs. Moreover, this research also investigates the existence of endogeneity by checking the reverse causality between CG and SP as many previous studies highlighted the endogenous nature of many governance and performance variables. Using a panel of 173 MFIs in 18 Asian countries for the period of 5 years, a comprehensive CG index (CGI) based on seven internal governance mechanism variables is constructed as an indicator of the overall CG mechanism of MFIs. By employing generalized least squares (GLS) model, our results indicate insignificant impact of CG on many SP variables which are attributed to the endogenous nature of this relationship as the significance of results improved by studying relationship in reverse direction by employing ordered logit model. Our results indicate that SP is an important determinant of CG mechanism of MFIs even after controlling for MFI-related characteristics.
AboagyeA. Q. & OtiekuJ. (2010). Are Ghanaian MFIs’ performance associated with corporate governance?Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(3), 307–320.
2.
AckermanR. W. (1973). How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review, 51(4), 88–98.
3.
AdamsR. B. & FerreiraD. (2009). Women in the board room and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
4.
BassemS. B. (2009). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Mediterranean countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 31–43.
5.
BebchuckL.CohenA. & FerrellA. (2009). What matters in corporate governance?The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.
6.
BlackS. B.JangH. & KimW. (2006). Predicting firms’ corporate governance choices: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 660–691.
7.
BoeheD. M. & CruzL. B. (2013). Gender and microfinance performance: Why does the institutional context matter?World Development, 47(July), 121–135.
8.
BorschS. A. & KokeJ. (2002). An applied econometricians’ view of empirical corporate governance studies. German Economic Review, 3(3), 295–326.
9.
ByronK. & PostC. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442.
10.
CampionA. & WhiteV. (2001). NGO transformation. Microenterprises Best Practices. USA: Development Alternatives, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-paper-ngo-transformation-jun-2001.pdf
11.
CampionA.LinderC. & KatherineE. K. (2008). Putting the ‘social’ into performance management: A practice-based guide for microfinance. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
12.
CGAP (2008). Appraisal guide for microfinance institutions. Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP)/The World Bank.
13.
ChenA.KaoL.TsaoM. & WuC. (2007). Building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of ownership and leadership for firms in Taiwan. Corporate Governance, 15, 251–261. doi: 10.1111/j.14678683.2007.00572.x
14.
ChenW. C.LinJ. B. & YiB. (2008). CEO duality and firm performance an endogenous issue. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(1), 58–65.
15.
ChoH. M. (1998). Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103–121.
16.
ChristenR. P. (2001). Commercialization and mission drift: The transformation of microfinance in Latin America. (Occasional Paper No. 5). Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
17.
ChristenR. P.VogelE. & McKeanC. (1995). Maximizing the outreach of microenterprise finance: The emerging lessons of successful programs. Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
18.
ColemanK. A. & OseiA. K. (2008). Outreach and profitability of microfinance institutions: The role of governance. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(3), 236–248.
19.
Council of Microfinance Equity Funds (2012). Census statement, the practice of corporate governance in microfinance institutions. Council of Microfinance Equity Funds (CMEF). Retrieved from https://fiecouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Governance-Guidelines_2012_EN.pdf
20.
CrombruggheA. D.TenikueM. & SuredeJ. (2008). Performance analysis for a sample of microfinance institutions In India. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(2), 269–299.
21.
CSFI (2012). Microfinance banana skins, the CSFI survey of microfinance risk. United Kingdom: Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation. ISBN: 978-0-9570895-4-9
22.
CSFI (2014). Microfinance banana skins 2014, the CSFI survey of microfinance risk. United Kingdom: Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation.
23.
CullR.DemirgucK. A. & MorduchJ. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading microfinance banks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F107–F133.
24.
DaherL. & SoutL. E. (2013). Microfinance and financial performance. Strategic Change, 22(1–2), 31–45.
25.
DaltonR. D.JohnsonL. J. & EllstrandE. A. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.
26.
De GraafF. J. & HerkströterC. A. (2007). How corporate social performance is institutionalised within the governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 177–189.
27.
ElsayedK. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance?Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1203–1214.
28.
FarooqueA. O.ZijlV. T. & DunstanK. (2007a). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: Link between ownership and financial performance. Corporate Governance; An International Review, 15, 1453–1468. doi: 10.1111/j. 1467-8683.2007.00657.x.
29.
FarooqueA. O.ZijlV. T.DunstanK. & KarimW. A. (2007b). Ownership structure and corporate performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 127–149. doi: 10.1080/16081625.2007.9720792.
30.
FernandezC. & Gomez-AnsonS. (2006). Does ownership structure affect firm performance? Evidence from a continental-type governance system. Corporate Ownership & Control, 3(2), 74–89.
31.
FreemanR. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
32.
GalemaR.LensinkR. & MerslandR. (2012). Do powerful CEOs determine microfinance performance?Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 718–742.
33.
GompersA. P.IshiiL. J. & MetrickA. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155.
34.
GonzalezA. (2010). Microfinance synergies and trade-offs: Social versus financial performance outcomes in 2008 (Data Brief No. 7). Microfinance Information Exchange. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1696582
35.
GruszczynskiM. (2006). Corporate governance and financial performance of companies in Poland. International Advances in Economic Research, 12(2), 251–259.
36.
GuptaA. D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and strategy a bird’s eye view. Global Business Review, 13(1), 153–165.
37.
HarjotoM. & JoH. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67.
38.
HartarskaV. (2005). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states. World Development, 33(10), 1627–1643.
39.
HartarskaV. & MerslandR. (2012). Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. European Financial Management, 18(2), 218–239.
40.
HartarskaV. & NadolnyakD. (2007). Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence. Applied Economics, 39(10), 1207–1222.
41.
HermesN. & LensinkR. (2007). The empirics of microfinance; What do we know?The Economic Journal, 117(517), F1–F10.
42.
HillmanA. J. & CannellaA. A.Jr (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.
43.
HillmanA. J. & DalzielT. (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 83–96.
44.
HudonM. (2006). Financial performance, management and ratings of the microfinance institutions: Do subsidies matter? (CEB Working Paper 05-015). Brussels, Belgium: Solvay Business School.
45.
JamaliD.SafieddineA. M. & RabbathM. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.
46.
JanssonT.RosalesR. & GlennW. D. (2004). Principles and practices for regulating and supervising microfinance. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
47.
JamaliD.SafieddineA. M. & RabbathM. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.
48.
JensenC. M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.
49.
JensenC. M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.
50.
JensenM. C. & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
51.
JoH. & HarjotoM. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.
52.
JoH. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.
53.
KhanA.MuttakinM. B. & SiddiquiJ. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223.
54.
LabieM. & MerslandR. (2011). Corporate governance challenges in microfinance. In ArmendarizB. & LabieM. (Eds), Microfinance handbook. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
55.
LapenuC.(CERISE) & PierretD.(IRAM). (2006). Handbook for the analysis of governance of microfinance institutions. Rome, Italy: IFAD and Finnish Supplementary Funds. Retrieved from https://www.ifad.org/documents/10180/6de5fae4-d98e-4406-ab48-4b6e8f0c6ba0
56.
LauerK. (2008) Transforming NGO MFIs: Critical ownership issues to consider (Occasional-Paper, 13). Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
57.
LedgerwoodJ. & WhiteW. (2006). Transforming microfinance institutions: Providing full financial services to the poor. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
58.
LehnM. K.PatroS. & ZhaoM. (2009). Determinants of the size and composition of US corporate boards: 1935–2000. Financial Management, 38(4), 747–780.
59.
LiptonM. & LorschW. J. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.
60.
LodererC. & MartinK. (1997). Executive stock ownership and performance: Tracking fainttraces. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2), 223–255.
61.
ManderlierA.BacqS.GiacominO. & JanssenF. (2009). The impact of South Asian Microfinance institutions corporate governance mechanisms on their social and financial performance: An exploratory study (pp. 1–30). Belgium: CRECIS Center for Research in Entrepreneurial Change & Innovative Strategies.
62.
MerslandR. (2009). The cost of ownership in microfinance organizations. World Development, 37(2), 469–478. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.006
63.
MerslandR. & StromR. O. (2008). Performance and trade-offs in microfinance organizations: Does ownership matter?Journal of International Development, 20(5), 598–612.
64.
MerslandR. (2009). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(4), 662–669.
65.
MittonT. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 215–241.
66.
MorckR.ShleiferA. & VishnyR. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1–2), 293–315.
67.
MoriN. & MerslandR. (2014). Boards in microfinance institutions: How do stakeholders matter?Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 285–313.
68.
OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance (Policy Brief). France: OECD Publications service.
69.
OxelheimL. & RandoyT. (2003) The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.
70.
PfefferJ. & SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
71.
PolancoO. F. (2005). Commercializing microfinance and deepening outreach? Empirical evidence from Latin America. Journal of Microfinance, 7(2), 47–69.
72.
PostC. & ByronK. (2014). Women on boards of directors and firms’ social performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 10183.
73.
RandoyT. & GoelS. (2001). Ownership structure, founding family leadership and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of business venturing, 18(5), 619–637.
74.
RaufA. S. & MahmoodT. (2009). Growth and performance of microfinance in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 47(1), 99–122.
75.
SarkarA. N. & SinghJ. (2006). Savings-led micro-finance to bank the unbankables sharing of global experience. Global Business Review, 7(2), 271–295.
76.
SchererA.PalazzoG. & BaumannD. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 502–532.
77.
SchmiedJ. (2014). Financial performance and social goals of microfinance institutions. (Potsdam Economic Papers 2). Germany: Potsdam University Press.
78.
SchreinerM. (2002). Aspects of outreach: A framework for discussion of the social benefits of microfinance. Journal of International Development, 14(5), 591–603.
79.
ServinR.LensinkR. & BergM. V. (2012). Ownership and technical efficiency of microfinance institutions: Empirical evidence from Latin America. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7), 2136–2144.
80.
SinhaR. (2006). Corporate governance and shareholder value analysis. Global Business Review, 7(1), 1–16.
81.
SinhaF. & ChaudharyB. R. (2011). Governance: Integrating SPM into microfinance capacity building. Imp-Act Consortium and MicroSave. Brighton UK: University of Sussex. Retrieved from https://www.microfinancegateway.org/library/governance-integrating-spm-microfinance-capacity-building
82.
SpitzeckH. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 495–505.
83.
StromR. O.D’EspallierB. & MerslandR. (2014). Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 42(May), 60–75.
84.
TchuigouaT. H. (2010). Is there a difference in performance by the legal status of microfinance institutions?The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50, 436–442. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2010.07.003
85.
ThrikawalaS.LockeS. & ReddyK. (2013). Corporate governance—Performance relationship in microfinance institutions (MFIs). Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(1), 160–182. doi: 10.5296/ajfa.v5i1.3119
86.
ValentiM. A.LuceR. & MayfieldC. (2011). The effects of firm performance on corporate governance. Management Research Review, 34(3), 266–283.
87.
VanrooseA. (2007). Is microfinance an ethical way to provide financial services to the poor? Microfinance: Are its promises ethically justified? (Working Paper No. 07-014). Center Emile Bernheim (CEB) Solvey Business School.
88.
WelbourneT. M. (1999). Wall street likes its women: An examination of women in the top management teams of initial public offerings (CAHRS Working Paper No. 99-07). Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
89.
WintokiM. B.LinckJ. S. & NetterJ. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
90.
WollerG. (2006). Evaluating MFI’s social performance: A measurement tool (Micro-report No. 35). Washington DC: United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
91.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The MIT Press.
92.
WruckK. H. (1989). Equity ownership concentration and firm value—Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(1), 3–28.
