The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which MBA programmes offered by top European and Asian B-schools have a corporate social responsibility and sustainability (CSRS) orientation as per their websites. The websites of top-200 (based on the QS Global Business and Management University Rankings 2015) European and Asian B-schools were explored and content analysed to reach meaningful conclusions. The findings reveal European B-schools have much stronger CSRS orientation once compared with the Asian B-schools. Furthermore, only few B-schools promote CSRS centres on their websites which has some useful practical implications. This is the first study to explore the CSRS orientation among top-200 European and Asian B-schools based on an analysis of their respective websites. Additionally, a cross-continental comparison between European and Asian MBA programmes is unique to this study. The results have implications for global managers, in general, and business school policymakers, in specific, to embark the CSR initiatives to gain competitive advantage.
AmranA., KhalidS.N.A., RazakD.A., & HaronH. (2010). Development of MBA with specialisation in sustainable development: The experience of Universiti Sains Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3), 260–273.
2.
ArikanE., KanturD., MadenC., & TelciE.E. (2016). Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 129–149.
3.
ArlowP. (1991). Personal characteristics in college students’ evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 63–69.
4.
BalchO. (2007). Flexible courses and more focused teaching at Europe’s schools. Ethical Corporation, 8–9.
5.
BennisW.G., & O’TooleJ. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.
6.
BhattacharyaC., KorschunD., & SenS. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 257–272.
7.
BrammerS., JacksonG., & MattenD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.
8.
BrancoM.C., & DelgadoC. (2016). Corporate social responsibility education and research in Portuguese business schools. Social Responsibility Education Across Europe (pp. 207–227). Springer.
9.
ChappleW., & MoonJ. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia a seven-country study of CSR website reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441.
10.
ChristensenL.J., PeirceE., HartmanL.P., HoffmanW.M., & CarrierJ. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368.
11.
ClarkeM. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1), 59–70.
12.
CraneA., & MattenD. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
13.
DeemR., MokK.H., & LucasL. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83–97.
14.
DikeçA., KaneV., & ÇaparN. (2016). Cross-country and cross-sector CSR variations: A comparative analysis of CSR reporting in the US, South Korea, and Turkey. In JamaliDima (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Global Corporate Social Responsibility (p. 69). Pennsylvania, United States: IGI Global.
15.
ElobeidD.E., KaifiB.A., & LeleU. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in higher education institutions: The experience of the college of business and economics at Qassim University. International Leadership Journal, 8(1), 120–142.
16.
EvansJ.M., TreviñoL.K., & WeaverG.R. (2006). Who’s in the ethics driver’s seat? Factors influencing ethics in the MBA curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 278–293.
17.
FrancoA. (2015). Evaluation and strategic development within the brand management of an International MBA program. ASEAN Journal of Management & Innovation, 2(1).
18.
FriedmanM. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Springer.
19.
GarrettG., SalonerG., NohriaN., & HubbardG. (2016). The achievements and future of business education. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(3), 8–25.
20.
GhoshS. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility in India still in a confused state?—A study of the participation of the private sector companies of India in corporate social responsibility activities. Global Business Review, 16(1), 151–181.
21.
GioiaD.A., & CorleyK.G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 107–120.
22.
GrayR., KouhyR., & LaversS. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
23.
GuthrieJ., & ParkerL.D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.
24.
HalkosG., HalkosG., SkouloudisA., & SkouloudisA. (2017). Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility and national culture: A quantitative assessment. Management decision, 55(3), 595–613.
25.
HartT.A., FoxC.J., EdeK.F., & KorstadJ. (2015). Do, but don’t tell: The search for social responsibility and sustainability in the websites of the top-100 US MBA programs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(5), 706–728.
26.
HemingwayC.A., & MaclaganP.W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.
27.
HesselbarthC., & SchalteggerS. (2014). Educating change agents for sustainability–learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 24–36.
28.
HowardT., CornuelE., SchlegelmilchB.B., & ThomasH. (2011). The MBA in 2020: Will there still be one?Journal of Management Development, 30(5), 474–482.
29.
JablonkaiR. (2016). Social responsibility education in the Hungarian context. Social Responsibility Education Across Europe (pp. 91–114). Springer.
30.
JensenM.C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21.
31.
KashifM., & KhattakA. (2017). Ethical intentions among frontline employees working in the US-based fast food chains in Pakistan: The moderating role of love of money. British Food Journal, 119(7), 1547–1561.
32.
KashifM., ZarkadaA., & RamayahT. (2016). The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–21.
33.
KashifM., ZarkadaA., & ThurasamyR. (2017). The moderating effect of religiosity on ethical behavioural intentions: An application of the extended theory of planned behaviour to Pakistani bank employees. Personnel Review, 46(2), 429–448.
34.
KhuranaR. (2010). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton University Press.
35.
KolkA. (2015). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 2016.
36.
MaonF., SwaenV., & LindgreenA. (2017). One vision, different paths: An investigation of corporate social responsibility initiatives in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 405.
37.
MattenD. (2004). CSR in Asia: A seven country study of CSR website reporting. Research Paper Series International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Nottingham University Business School Ministry of the Environment, Statistical Survey of Companies for Environmentally Friendly Activities for Fiscal Year.
38.
MattenD., & MoonJ. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
39.
McKennaB., & BiloslavoR. (2011). Human flourishing as a foundation for a new sustainability oriented business school curriculum: Open questions and possible answers. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 691–710.
40.
MoonJ., & OrlitzkyM. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability education: A trans-Atlantic comparison. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 583–603.
41.
MuniapanB., & DassM. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A philosophical approach from an ancient Indian perspective. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 1(4), 408–420.
42.
NaeemM., & NealM. (2012). Sustainability in business education in the Asia Pacific region: A snapshot of the situation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(1), 60–71.
43.
NaeemM.A., & PeachN.W. (2011). Promotion of sustainability in postgraduate education in the Asia Pacific region. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(3), 280–290.
44.
NagT., & BhattacharyyaA.K. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in India: Exploring linkages with firm performance. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1427–1440.
45.
NavarroP. (2008). The MBA core curricula of top-ranked US business schools: A study in failure?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 108–123.
46.
NewportD., ChesnesT., & LindnerA. (2003). The ‘environmental sustainability’ problem: Ensuring that sustainability stands on three legs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 357–363.
47.
NikolaidisY., & EfthymiadisG. (2016). Education on corporate social responsibility in Greece: Is there any and does it affect students’ perception?Social Responsibility Education Across Europe (pp. 161–184). Springer.
48.
NiskanenJ., & NieminenT. (2001). The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: A study of Finnish listed firms’ environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(1), 29.
49.
PereraC.R., & HewegeC.R. (2016). Integrating sustainability education into international marketing curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(1), 123–148.
50.
PurushothamanS., RaviC., NagendraH., MathaiM., MundoliS., JosephG., … BursztynM. (2016). Sustainability in higher education for the Global South: A conversation across geographies and disciplines. Sustentabilidade em Debate, 7(1), 156–173.
51.
RoweJ. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as business strategy. Center for Global, International and Regional Studies.
52.
RyanA., TilburyD., CorcoranP. B., AbeO., & NomuraK. (2010). Sustainability in higher education in the Asia-Pacific: Developments, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 106–119.
53.
SchwartzM.S., & CarrollA.B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.
54.
Setó-PamiesD., Domingo-VernisM., & Rabassa-FiguerasN. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in management education: Current status in Spanish universities. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 604–620.
55.
SharmaS., & HartS.L. (2014). Beyond ‘saddle bag’ sustainability for business education. Organization & Environment, 27(1), 10–15.
56.
ShephardK. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98.
57.
ShinJ.C., & ToutkoushianR.K. (2011). The past, present, and future of university rankings. University Rankings (pp. 1–16). Springer.
58.
SimõesC., & SoaresA.M. (2010). Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 371–389.
59.
SpringettD., & KearinsK. (2001). Gaining legitimacy? Sustainable development in business school curricula. Sustainable Development, 9(4), 213–221.
60.
SterlingS., & ThomasI. (2006). Education for sustainability: The role of capabilities in guiding university curricula. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 349–370.
61.
StubbsW., HigginsC., & MilneM. (2013). Why do companies not produce sustainability reports?Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 456–470.
62.
ThomasI., & DayT. (2014). Sustainability capabilities, graduate capabilities, and Australian universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(2), 208–227.
63.
Van VelsorE., HindP., WilsonA., & LenssenG. (2009). Developing leaders for sustainable business. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(1), 7–20.
64.
Von Der HeidtT., & LambertonG. (2011). Sustainability in the undergraduate and postgraduate business curriculum of a regional university: A critical perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 670–690.
65.
WalsA.E., & JicklingB. (2002). ‘Sustainability’ in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221–232.
66.
WanderleyL.S.O., LucianR., FaracheF., & de Sousa FilhoJ.M. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: A context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 369–378.
67.
WelfordR. (2005a). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical elements and best practice. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (13), 31.
68.
WelfordR. (2005b). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 survey results. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (17), 33.
69.
WuY.-C. J., HuangS., KuoL., & WuW.-H. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 520–531.
