This article examines the determinants of dividend smoothing behaviour of business group-affiliated firms relative to unaffiliated firms in India during the period from 1994–1995 to 2012–2013. The study is based on 240 sample firms listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) that has continuous dividend data for the entire period. The business group-affiliated firms tend to smooth their dividend payments more than that of standalone firms and the actual payout ratio as well as the target payout ratio of business group-affiliated firms is higher than that of standalone firms. For the determinants of dividend smoothing, the investment opportunities and the financial leverage are the significant factors influencing the dividend smoothing behaviour of business group-affiliated firms and standalone firms, respectively. For the entire sample, the firms with high investment opportunities, low leverage, high business risk and that are smaller in size tend to smooth their dividend payments more. As for the macroeconomic factors, the high dividend distribution tax (DDT) imposed by government tends the firms to smooth their dividend payments more. Overall, the results support the information asymmetry and agency-based explanation of dividend smoothing behaviour.
AivazianV.A.BoothL. & ClearyS. (2006). Dividend smoothing and debt ratings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(2), 439–453.
2.
AllenF.BernardoA.E. & WelchI. (2000). A theory of dividends based on tax clienteles. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2499–2536.
3.
AllenF. & MichaelyR. (2003). Payout policy. In ConstantinidesG.M.HarrisM. & StulzR.M. (Eds), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (pp. 337–429). North Holland: Elsevier.
4.
AmiduM. (2007). How does dividend policy affect performance of the firm on Ghana Stock Exchange?Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 4(2), 103–112.
5.
AnandM. (2002). Corporate finance practices in India: A survey. Vikalpa, 27(4), 29–56.
6.
AngJ.S. (1987). Do dividends matter? A review of corporate dividend theories and evidence. New York, NY: Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions and the Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University.
7.
AtiaseR.K. (1985). Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 21–36.
8.
BernheimB.D. (1991). Tax policy and the dividend puzzle. RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1), 455–476.
9.
BhattacharyaS. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and ‘the bird in the hand’ fallacy. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259–270.
10.
BravA.GrahamJ.R.HarveyC.R. & MichaelyR. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(3), 483–527.
11.
BrennanM.J. & ThakorA.V. (1990). Shareholder preferences and dividend policy. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 993–1018.
12.
BrymanA. & CramerD. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 8 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
13.
DeAngeloH. & DeAngeloL. (2007). Capital structure, payout policy, and financial flexibility (Working Paper No. FBE 02-06). Los Angeles, CA: Marshall School of Business.
14.
DemarzoP.M. & SannikovY. (2016). Learning, termination, and payout policy in dynamic incentive contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(1), 182–236.
15.
DewenterK.L. & WartherV.A. (1998). Dividends, asymmetric information, and agency conflicts: Evidence from a comparison of the dividend policies of Japanese and US firms. The Journal of Finance, 53(3), 879–904.
16.
EddyA. & SeifertB. (1988). Firm size and dividend announcements. Journal of Financial Research, 11(4), 295–302.
17.
FamaE.F. & BabiakH. (1968). Dividend policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324), 1132–1161.
18.
FamaE.F. & FrenchK.R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay?Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3–43.
19.
FerrisS.P.KimK.A. & KitsabunnaratP. (2003). The costs (and benefits?) of diversified business groups: The case of Korean chaebols. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(2), 251–273.
20.
FrankM.Z. & GoyalV.K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(1), 217–248.
21.
FudenbergD. & TiroleJ. (1995). A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 75–93.
22.
GopalanR.NandaV. & SeruA. (2007). Affiliated firms and financial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 759–795.
23.
GujaratiD.N. (2012). Basic econometrics (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
24.
GuttmanI.KadanO. & KandelE. (2010). Dividend stickiness and strategic pooling. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 4455–4495.
25.
HarrisM. & RavivA. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297–355.
26.
JensenM.C. & MecklingW.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
27.
JeongJ. (2013). Determinants of dividend smoothing in emerging market: The case of Korea. Emerging Markets Review, 17(1), 76–88.
28.
JohnK. & WilliamsJ. (1985). Dividends, dilution, and taxes: A signaling equilibrium. Journal of Finance, 40(1), 1053–1070.
29.
KhannaT. & PalepuK. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.
30.
KhannaT. & RivkinJ.W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.
31.
KhannaT. & YafehY. (2005). Business groups and risk sharing around the world. The Journal of Business, 78(1), 301–340.
32.
KumarP. (1988). Shareholder–manager conflict and the information content of dividends. Review of Financial Studies, 1(2), 111–136.
LambrechtB.M. & MyersS.C. (2012). A Lintner Model of Payout and Managerial Rents. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1761–1810.
35.
LearyM.T. & MichaelyR. (2011). Determinants of dividend smoothing: Empirical evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 24(10), 3197–3249.
36.
LemmonM. & ZenderJ. (2010). Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(1), 1161–1187.
37.
LintnerJ. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97–113.
38.
MaitraD. & DeyK. (2012). Dividend announcement and market response in Indian stock market: An event-study analysis. Global Business Review, 13(2), 269–283.
39.
ManosR.MurindeV. & GreenC.J. (2012). Dividend policy and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 21(1), 42–56.
40.
MarshT.A. & MertonR.C. (1986). Dividend variability and variance bounds tests for the rationality of stock market prices. The American Economic Review, 76(1), 483–498.
41.
MazumdarS. (2008). The analysis of business groups: Some observations with reference to India (Working Paper No. 2008/11). New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
42.
MichaelyR. & RobertsM.R. (2012). Corporate dividend policies: Lessons from private firms. Review of Financial Studies, 25(3), 711–746.
43.
MillerM.H. & ScholesM.S. (1978). Dividends and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(4), 333–364.
44.
MullerN. & SvenssonT. (2014). Dividend smoothing in Sweden: An empirical investigation of determinants of dividend smoothing (Unpublished Dissertation). Lund: Lund University.
45.
MyersS.C. & MajlufN.S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
46.
NakataniI. (1984). The economic role of corporate financial groupings. In AokiM. (Ed.), Economic Analysis of Japanese Firm (pp. 227–258). New York, NY: Elsevier.
47.
PandeyI.M. & BhatR. (2007). Dividend behaviour of Indian companies under monetary policy restrictions. Managerial Finance, 33(1), 14–25.
48.
ProwseS. (1990). Institutional investment patterns and corporate financial behavior in the US and Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 43–66.
49.
RozyckiJ.J. (1997). A tax motivation for smoothing dividends. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37(2), 563–578.
50.
SaravanakumarS. (2011). Impact of dividend announcement on Indian bourses. Global Business Review, 12(3), 401–413.
51.
SinghaniaM. (2005). Trends in Dividend Payout: A Study of Select Indian Companies. Journal of Management Research, 5(3), 129–142.
52.
UwuigbeU.JafaruJ. & AjayiA. (2012). Dividend policy and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Nigeria. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 11(3), 442–454.
