Management accounting information system (MAIS) is an integral part of an organizational structure. MAIS refers to the normative, but when MAIS is implemented, it has unintended or unforeseen consequences, this is because, in the context of social organization and socially too, it is not been well understood by users. To avoid the user’s misunderstanding which gives the effect on the quality of MAIS, organizational culture can connect these problems. This study was conducted at the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia. Data analysis of study used structural equation model (SEM) with the approach of partial least square (PLS). The study results found that organizational culture affects the quality of MAIS. The results also found that the dimensions and indicators that are used to build the study model showed strong value, which means that the dimensions and indicators reflect the organizational culture and the quality of MAIS in SOEs in Indonesia.
AgbejuleA. (2011). Organizational culture and performance: The role of management accounting system. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(1), 74–89.
2.
ArifinZ. (2010). Merubah Budaya BUMN: Komitmen Menjalankan GCG. Retrieved 9April2014, from http://muc-gcg-risk.blogspot.com/2010/08/merubah-budaya-bumn-komitmen.html
3.
BelkaouiA.R. (2002). Behavioural management accounting. London: Quorum Books.
4.
CarenzoP. & TurollaA. (2010). The diffusion of management accounting systems in manufacturing companies: An empirical analysis of Italian firms. Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 20, 457–499. DOI: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/S1479-3512%282010%290000020019
5.
ChangC.-S.ChenS.-Y. & LanY.-T. (2012). Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence based practice. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(135), 1–12.
6.
ChatterjeeD. (2014). Management control systems and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: An empirical study of innovators and low innovators. Global Business Review, 15(3), 565–582.
DavidR. & RichardM. (2007). People management Teori dan Strategi. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.
9.
EberY. & PliskinN. (1996). The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm’s effectiveness. Information and Management, 30(2), 81–90.
10.
GeorgeJ.M. & JonesG. (2010). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
11.
GrayS.J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. ABACUS, 24(1), 1–15.
12.
HallJ.A. (2011). Accounting information systems (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cangage Learning.
13.
HamdanM.W. (2012, March). The impact of accounting information systems (AIS) development life cycle on its effectiveness and critical success factors. European Scientific Journal, 8(6), 19–32.
HeidmannM.SchäfferU. & StrahringerS. (2008). Exploring the role of management accounting systems in strategic sensemaking. Information Systems Management, 25(3), 244–257.
IndejW.G. & ZhengQ. (2010). Organizational culture and information systems implementation: A structuration theory perspective. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(27). Retrieved from https://faculty.mu.edu.sa/public/uploads/1360773295.5985organizational%20cult127.pdf
18.
IskanDahlan. (2013). BUMN Pacu Budaya Inovasi. Melalu. Retrieved 5April2014, from http://pasundanekspres.co.id/pasundan/9431-bumn-pacu-budaya-inovasi
19.
JaparinS. (2014). Pelni: Induk Usaha Maritim Tekan Biaya Logistik. Investor Daily, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.investor.co.id/home/pelni-induk-usaha-maritim-tekan-biaya-logistik/84522
20.
JonesC.S. (1985). An empirical study of the role of management accounting systems following takeover or merger. Accounting Organizations and Society, 10(2), 177–200.
21.
JurnaliT. & Siti-NabihaA.K. (2015). Performance management system for local government: The Indonesian experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363.
22.
KaplanR.S. (1984, July). The evolution of management accounting. The Accounting Review, 59(3), 390–418.
23.
KaplanR.S. & AtkinsonA.A. (1998). Advanced management accounting (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
24.
KapposA. & RivardS. (2008, September). A three perspective model of culture, information systems, and their development and use. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 601–634.
25.
KendallK.E. & KendallJ.E. (2011). Systems analysis and design (8th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
26.
KhorK.S.ThurasamyR.AhmadN.H.HalimH.A. & May-ChiuL. (2015). Bridging the gap of green IT/IS and sustainable consumption. Global Business Review, 15(4), 571–593.
27.
KreitnerR. & KinichiA. (2003). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
28.
LaudonK.C. & LaudonJ.P. (2012). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (12th ed.). New Jersey: Perason Prentice Hall.
29.
LawrenceS.AlamM.NorthcottD. & LoweT. (1997). Accounting systems and systems of accountability in the New Zealand health sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(5), 665–683.
30.
LustigM.W. & KoesterJ. (2010). Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures (6th ed.). Botston: Pearson.
31.
LuthansF. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
32.
McShaneS.L. & GlinowM.A.V. (2010). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world (5th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
33.
MiaL. & PatiarA. (2001, June). The use of management accounting systems in hotels: An exploratory study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(2), 111–128.
34.
NapitupuluI.H. (2015a). Impact of organizational culture on the qualty of management accounting information system: A theoritical approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(4), 74–83.
35.
NapitupuluI.H. (2015b). Antecedence of user satisfaction in management accounting information systems quality: User involvement and user competency (Survey of Indonesia manufacture company managers). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(2), 561–577.
36.
NapitupuluI.H. & DalimuntheA.R. (2015, September). The influence of information system user competency and the quality of management accounting information systems on user satisfaction. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(31), 660–667.
37.
OngC.S.DayM.Y. & HsuW.L. (2009). The measurement of user satisfaction with question answering systems. Information and Management, 46(7), 397–403.
ScheinE.H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
41.
SingarimbunM. & EffendiS. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survai, LP3ES. Jakarta: Pustakan.
42.
StairR.M. & ReynoldsG.W. (2010). Principles of information systems (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Course Technology.
43.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penellitian Bisnis Kombinasi. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
44.
SusantoA. (2008). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Bandung: Lingga Jaya.
45.
TurbanE. & VoloninoL. (2011). Information technology for management: Improving strategic and operational performance (8th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
46.
WagnerJ.A.III & HollenbeckJ.R. (2005). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge–Taylor and Francis Group.
47.
WilkinsonJ.W. (1989). Accounting information system: Essential concepts and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
48.
WixomB.H. & ToddP.A. (2005, March). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
