The dynamic relationship between bilateral exports demand for Pakistan and exchange rate volatility as well as some selected explanatory variables with six major trading partners’ countries, namely, USA, UK, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Germany and UAE, has been examined during 1982Q1 to 2013Q2. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound testing approach suggests a stable long-run relationship among selected explanatory variables over the sample period from Pakistan’s bilateral exports to each of its chosen trading partner except Japan. The result suggests that exchange rate volatility adversely affects the demand for Pakistani exports to USA but it positively affects demand for Pakistani exports to Germany in the long run. The short-run causality analysis of ARDL demonstrates that exchange rate volatility causes demand for Pakistani exports in USA and UK adversely, while in case of Germany it causes positively. For Saudi Arabia and UAE, real effective exchange rate volatility does not affect demand for Pakistani exports in the short run as well as in the long run. The study concludes that different export elasticities for different export recipient countries derived in the present study suggest that a single trade policy will not provide a solution to improve country’s external trade sector.
AlamS., & AhmedQ.M. (2011). Exchange rate volatility and Pakistan’s bilateral imports from major sources: An application of ARDL approach. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(2), 245–254.
2.
AristotelousK. (2001). Exchange-rate volatility, exchange-rate regime, and trade volume: Evidence from the UK-US export function (1889–1999). Economics Letters, 72(1), 87–94.
3.
ArizeAugustine C., OsangThomas, & SlottjeDaniel J. (2000). Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade: Evidence from thirteen LDC’s. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(1), 10–17.
4.
AsseeryA., & PeelD.A. (1991). The effects of exchange rate volatility on exports—Some new estimates. Economics Letters, 37(2), 173–177.
5.
BackmanM. (2006). Exchange rate volatility: How the Swedish export is influenced (Master thesis). Jönköping University.
6.
Bahmani-OskooeeM., & BohlM.T. (2000). German monetary unification and the stability of the German M3 money demand function. Economics Letters, 66(2), 203–208.
7.
Bahmani-OskooeeM., & GelanAbera. (2006). On the relation between nominal devaluation and real devaluation: Evidence from African countries. Journal of African Economics, 16(2), 177–197.
8.
Bahmani-OskooeeM., & NgR.C.W. (2002). Long-run demand for money in Hong Kong: An application of the ARDL model. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 147–155.
9.
BaileyM.J., TavlasGeorge S., & UlanMichael. (1986). Exchange-rate variability and trade performance: Evidence for the big seven industrial countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 122(3), 466–477.
10.
BanerjeeA., DoladoJ.J., GalbralthJ.W., & HendryD.F. (1993). Co-integration, error correction and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
BaumF.C., & CaglayanMustafa. (2008). The volatility of international trade flows and exchange rate uncertainty (Boston College Working Papers in Economics 695). MA, US: Boston College Department of Economics.
12.
BhawsarPragya, & ChattopadhyayUtpal. (2015). Competitiveness: Review, reflections and directions. Global Business Review, 16(4), 665–679.
BredinD., FountasS., & MurphyE. (2003). An empirical analysis of short run and long run Irish export functions: Does exchange rate volatility matter?International Review of Applied Economics, 17(2), 193–208.
15.
CaballeroR.J., & CorboI.V. (1989). The effect of real exchange rate uncertainty on exports: Empirical evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 3(2), 263–278.
16.
ChouW.L. (2000). Exchange rate variability and China’s exports. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(1), 61–79.
17.
ChoudhuryT. (2005). Exchange rate volatility and the United States exports: Evidence from Canada and Japan. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 19(1), 51–71.
18.
De VitaG., & AbbottA. (2004). Real exchange rate volatility and US exports: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Economic Issues, 9(1), 69–78.
FangWenShwo, & MillerStephen M. (2004). Exchange rate depreciation and exports: The case of Singapore revisited (Working Papers 2004-45). Connecticut, US: University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
21.
GujaratiD.N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
22.
HarrisR. (1995). Using co-integration analysis in econometric modelling. London, UK: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
HendryD.F. (1979). The behaviour of inconsistent instrumental variables estimators in dynamic systems with auto correlated errors. Journal of Econometrics, 9(3), 295–314.
24.
IMF (2014a). International financial statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
25.
IMF (2014b). Direction of trade statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
26.
KasmanA., & KasmanA. (2005). Exchange rate uncertainty in Turkey and its impact on export volume. METU Studies in Development, 32(1), 41–58.
27.
KronerKenneth F., & LastrapesWilliam D. (1993). The impact of exchange rate volatility on international trade: Reduced form estimates using the GARCH-in-mean model. Journal of International Money and Finance, 12, 298–318.
28.
KumarR., & DhawanR. (1991). Exchange rate volatility and Pakistan’s exports to the developed world: 1974–85. World Development, 19(9), 1225–1240.
29.
LaurencesonJ., & ChaiJ.C.H. (2003). Financial reform and economic development in China. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
30.
McKenzieM. (1998). The impact of exchange rate volatility on Australian trade flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 8(1), 21–38.
31.
McKenzieM.D., & BrooksRobert D. (1997). The impact of exchange rate volatility on German-US trade flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7(1), 73–87.
32.
MustafaK. & NishatMohammed. (2004). Volatility of exchange rate and export growth in Pakistan: The structure and interdependence in regional markets. The Pakistan Development Review, 43(4), 813–828.
33.
PesaranH.M., & PesaranB. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: An introduction to econometrics. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
PesaranM.H., ShinY., & SmithR.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics (special issue in honour of J.D. Sargan on the them. ‘Studies in Empirical Macro-econometrics’, HendryD.F. and PesaranM.H. (eds)) 16(3), 289–326.
35.
PoonW.C., ChoongC.K., & HabibullahM.S. (2005). Exchange rate volatility and exports for selected East Asian countries. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(2), 144–159.
36.
PozoSusan. (1992). Conditional exchange rate volatility and the volume of international trade: Evidence from the early 1900s. Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXIV(2), 325–329.
37.
RahmatsyahT., RajaguruG., & SiregarR.Y. (2002). Exchange rate volatility, trade, and “fixing for life” in Thailand. Japan and the World Economy, 14(4), 445–470.
38.
StockmanA.C.I. (1995). Effect of exchange rate risk on intra–EC trade. De Economist, 143(1), 4–54.
39.
TaglioniDaria. (2002). Exchange rate volatility as a barrier to trade: New methodologies and recent evidence. Economie Internationale, 1Q–2Q(89–90), 227–259.
40.
VergilH. (2002). Exchange rate volatility in Turkey and its effect on trade flows. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 4(1), 83–99.
41.
WarnerD., & KreinnM.E. (1983). Determinants of international trade flows. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(1), 96–104.
42.
WeiShang-Jin. (1999). Currency hedging and goods trade. European Economic Review, 43, 1371–1394.
