This study investigates the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in case of Pakistan using annual data from 1977 to 2013. Using Johansen maximum likelihood approach to estimate the long-run relationship and Granger causality to check the direction of causality, the study finds that the long-run relationship between natural gas consumption and economic growth is positive and statistically significant. Furthermore, the Granger causality shows that there exists energy-led growth hypothesis in Pakistan as Granger causality runs from energy to economic growth. The policy implication is that uninterrupted availability of energy is essential and conservation strategies could be harmful for the economic growth.
AltinayG., & KaragolE. (2005). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27(6), 849–856.
2.
ApergisN., & PayneJ.E. (2010). Natural gas consumption and economic growth: A panel investigation of 67 countries. Applied Energy, 87(8), 2759–2763.
3.
ApergisN., & PayneJ.E. (2011). A dynamic panel study of economic development and the electricity-consumption growth. Energy Economics, 33(5), 770–781.
4.
AqeelA., & ButtM.S. (2001). The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 8(2), 101–110.
5.
BildiriciM.E., & BakirtasT. (2014). The relationship among oil, natural gas and coal consumption and economic growth in BRICTS (Brazil, Russian, India, China, Turkey and South Africa) countries. Energy, 65(1), 134–144.
6.
BowdenN., & PayneJ.E. (2009). The causal relationship between U.S. energy consumption and real output: A disaggregated analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(2), 180–188.
7.
BowersW., & PierceG. (1975). The illusion of deterrence in ISAAC Ehrlich’s work on the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Yale Law Journal, 85(2), 187–208.
8.
CameronS. (1994). A review of the econometric evidence on the effects of capital punishment. Journal of Socio-economics, 23(1–2), 197–214.
9.
ChaudhryI.S., SafdarN., & FarooqF. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 32(2), 371–382.
10.
DasA., McFarlaneA.A., & ChowdhuryM. (2013). The dynamics of natural gas consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22(June), 269–274.
11.
DickeyD.A., & FullerW.A. (1979). Distribution for the estimates for auto regressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
12.
DickeyD.A., & FullerW.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
13.
EhrlichI. (1977). The deterrent effect of capital punishment reply. American Economic Review, 67(3), 452–458
14.
EhrlichI. (1996). Crime, punishment and the market for offences. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 43–67.
15.
EngleR.F., & GrangerG. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
16.
GhaliK.H., & El-SakkaM.T. (2004). Energy use and output growth in Canada: A multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 26(2), 225–238.
17.
GrangerC.J. (1969). Investigating causal relationships by econometrics models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 425–435.
18.
JohansenS. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.
19.
JohansenS., & JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference in cointegration—with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
20.
KhanM.A., & AhmadU. (2008). Energy demand in Pakistan: A disaggregate analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 437–455.
21.
KyophilavongP., UddinG.S., & ShahbazM. (2016). The Nexus between financial development and economic growth for Lao PDR. Global Business Review, 17(2), 303–317.
22.
LaysonS. (1983). Homicide and deterrence: Another view of the Canadian time-series evidence. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 16(1), 52–73.
23.
LeeC.C., & ChangC.P. (2005). Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: Evidence from Taiwan. Energy Economics, 27(6), 857–872.
24.
PhillipsP.C.B., & PerronP. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
25.
SariR., EwingB.T., & SoytasU. (2008). The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: An ARDL Approach. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2302–2313.
26.
ShahbazM., LeanH.H., & FarooqA. (2013). Natural gas consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18(1), 87–94.
27.
ShiuA., & LamP.L. (2004). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy, 32(1), 47–54.
28.
SiddiquiR. (2004). Energy and economic growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 43(2), 175–200.
29.
SternD.I. (2000). A multivariate co-integration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics, 22(2), 267–283.
30.
The World Bank (2015). World development indicators [CD Rom 2015]. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
31.
YuanJ.H., KangJ.G., ZhaoC.H., & HuZ.G. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from China at both aggregated and disaggregated Levels. Energy Economics, 30(6), 3077–3094.
32.
ZahidA. (2008). Energy—GDP relationship: A causal analysis for the five countries of South Asia. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 1(1), 167–180.
