The main purpose of this research article is to determine web experience and perceived web enjoyment as antecedents of online purchase intention. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was followed by two-stage structural equation modelling (SEM) to fit the data in the hypothesized model. The findings of the study reported that web experience of an online consumer is formed from website visual design, website interactivity, web privacy and web ease of navigation. This study also reported that perceived web enjoyment is partially mediating the relationship between web experience and the attitude of an online consumer. This study will help marketers to understand the importance of interactive web experience for online shoppers.
BisenA., SinghP., & AnandA. (2013). E-tailing in India—unlocking the potentional. Technopak. Retrieved from http://www.technopak.com/files/E-tailing_in_India.pdf
2.
BlackwellR., MiniardP., & EngelJ. (2001). Consumer behavior. Fort Worth, TX: South Western.
BradyL., & PhilipsC. (2003). Aesthetics and usability: A look at color and balance. Usability News, 5(1). Retrieved from http://usabilitynews.org/aesthetics-and-usability-a-look-at-color-and-balance/
5.
BramallC., SchoeferK., & MckechnieS. (2004). The determinants and consequences of consumer trust in e-retailing: A conceptual framework. Irish Marketing Review, 17(1–2), 3–22.
6.
ÇelikH. (2008). What determines Turkish consumers’ acceptance of Internet banking?International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 353–370.
7.
ChauP., & HuJ. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297–311.
8.
CheungM., & LaiZ. (2005). Internet based e-shopping and consumer attitude: An empirical study. Information and Management, 38(5), 299–306.
9.
ChildD. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Casel Education Limited.
10.
ConstantinidesE. (2002). The 4s web-marketing mix model, e-commerce research and applications. Elsevier Science, 1(1), 57–76.
11.
ConstantinidesE. (2004). Influencing the online consumer’s behavior: The web expereince. Internet Research, 14(2), 111–126.
12.
CyrD. (2008). Modeling website design across cultures: Relationships to trust, satisfaction ad e-loyalty. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 47–72.
13.
CyrD., KindraG., & DashS. (2008). Website design, trust, satisfaction and e-loyalty: The Indian experience. Online Information Review, 32(6), 773–790.
14.
DavisF., BagozziR., & WarshawP. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1109–1130.
15.
DennisC., MerrileesB., JayawardhenaC., & WrightL.T. (2009). E-consumer behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9–10), 1121–1139.
16.
ErogluS.A., MachleitK.A., & DavisL.M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmosphere and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139–160.
17.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
FornellC., & LarcherD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
19.
FowlerK., & BridgesE. (2010). Consumer innovativeness: Impact on expectations, perceptions and choice among retail formats. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(6), 492–500.
20.
GangulyB., DashS.B., & CyrD. (2009). Website characteristics, trust and purchase intention in online stores—an empirical study in the Indian context. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 6(2), 22–44.
21.
GeorgeA., & Gireesh KumarG.S. (2013). Antecedents of customer satisfaction in internet banking: Technology acceptance model (TAM) redefined. Global Business Review, 14(4), 627–638.
22.
GummerusJ., LiljanderV., PuraM., & Van RielA. (2004). Consumer loyalty to concept based websites: The case of an online health-care services. Journal of Service Marketing, 18(2–3), 175–186.
23.
HairJ.F.Jr., BlackW.C., BabinB.J., & AndersonR.E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7/e). New Delhi: Pearson Education.
24.
HarridgeM. (2006). Can the building of trust overcome consumer perceived risk online?Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(7), 746–761.
25.
HoffmanD., NovakT., & PeraltaM. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of ACM, 42(4), 80–85.
26.
HsuM., ChuangL., & HsuC. (2014). Undertanding online shopping intentions: The roles of four types of trust and their antecedents. Internet Research, 24(3), 332–352.
27.
IgbariaM., SchiffmanS.J., & WieckowskiT.J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(6), 349–361.
28.
KassimM., & RamayahT. (2015). Perceived risk factors influence on intention to continue using internet banking among Malaysians. Global Business Review, 16(3), 393–414.
29.
KesharwaniA., & BishtS.S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303–322.
30.
KhareA., KhareA., & SinghS. (2012). Attracting shoppers to shop online—challenges and opportunities for the Indian retail sector. Journal of Internet Commerce, 11(2), 161–185.
LeeM.C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141.
33.
LindgaardG. (1999). Does emotional appeal determine perceived usability of websites. Western Australia, Australia: CYBERG.
34.
MannB.S., & SahniS.K. (2011). Inter-relationship of website interactivity and customer outcomes: Building trust on internet bank websites. Global Business Review, 12(1), 99–115.
35.
MartinS.S., & CamareroC. (2009). How perceived risk affects online buying. Online Information Review, 33(4), 629–654.
36.
MartineauP. (1958). The personality of retail store. Harvard Business Review, 36(1), 47–55.
37.
MoonJ.W., & KimY.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230.
38.
NielsenJ. (2001). Designing for web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publications.
39.
NunnallyJ.C., & BernsteinI.H.1994, Psychometric theory, 3/e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
RanganathanC., & GanapathyS. (2002). Key dimensions of business to consumer websites. Information and Management, 39(6), 457–465.
41.
SalisburymW., PearsonR., PearsonA., & MillerD. (2000). Perceived security and world wide web purchase intention. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(4), 165–176.
42.
ShenkmanB., & JonssonF. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(5), 367–377.
43.
SmithH., MilbergS., & BurkeS. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals concerns about organisational practices. MIS Quaterly, 20(2), 167–196.
44.
SubramarianA., JainN., BajpaiS., & PatodiS. (2013). Digital India-from buzz to bucks capiatlizing on India’s digitally influenced consumers. BCG. Retrieved from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/center_consumer_customer_insight_globalization_from_buzz_to_bucks_capitalizing_indias_digitally_influenced_consumers/
45.
TabachnickB.G., & FidellL.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics, 4/e. London: Allyn and Bacon.
46.
TauberE. (1972). Why do people shop?Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 46–59.
47.
TeoT.S.H., LimV.K.G., & LaiR.Y.C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 25–37.
48.
TractinskyN., & LowengartO. (2007). Web-store aesthetics in e-retailing: A conceptual framework and some theoretical implications. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(1), 1–18.
49.
Van der HeijdenH. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541–549.
50.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation and emotion into the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal filed studies. Information Search Research, 11(4), 342–365.
51.
VrechopoulosA. (2004). Designing alternative store layouts for internet retailing. Consumer Driven Electronic Transformation (pp. 91–109). Berlin: Springer.
52.
WanF., NanN., & SmithM.C. (2009). Consumers optimal experience on commercial websites: A congruency effect of web atmospheric design and consumers’ surfing goal. In BandyopadhyayS. (Ed.), Contemporary research in e-branding (pp. 78–94). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
53.
WangY., & EmurianH. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 105–125.
54.
Watch Fire Whitepaper Series. (2000). Bad things shouldn’t happen to good website: Best practices for managing the web-experience. Retrieved 20October2014, from www.watchfire.com:http://www.watchfire.com/resources/search-and-ye-shall-find.pdf
55.
WolfinbargerM. & GillyM.C. (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, 43(2), 34–55.
56.
YoonS. (2002). The antecedents and cosequences of trust in online purchase decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 47–63.
