This research develops principles for an evaluation criterion of the performance of a service firm. The aim of this article is to provide an analysis on the relationship between information technology (IT) adoption and its usage and firm performance (banking and software firm) in India. Firm performance was measured with the help of three important variables: efficiency, effectiveness and profitability. Each one of the above has been described with a set of pretested questionnaires. Banks in India in particular are geared for comprehensive banking solutions with extensive branch networks. The result from statistical analysis was validated with that achieved from artificial neural network (ANN) modelling.
AdriaanV.H.N., & LilianeP. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicators selection. Omega, 42(4), 33–46.
2.
ArasliH.A. (2005). A comparison of service quality in the banking industry: Some evidence from Turkish- and Greek-speaking areas in Cyprus. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(7), 508–526.
3.
BergendahlG., & LindblomT. (2008). Evaluating the performance of Swedish savings banks according to service efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 1663–1673.
4.
BrazR.G.F., ScavardaL.F., & MartinsR.A. (2011). Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 751–760.
5.
CalabreseA. (2012). Service productivity and service quality: A necessary trade-off. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 800–812.
6.
ChanF.T.S., NayakA., RajR., ChongA.Y.L., TiwariM. (2014). An innovative supply chain performance measurement system incorporating Research and Development (R&D) and marketing policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 69(1), 64–70.
7.
ChanH.C.Y., & NgaiE.W.T. (2010). What makes customers discontent with service providers? An empirical vice analysis of complaint handling in information and communication technology services. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 73–110.
8.
ChenJ.S., & Tsou, Hung T. (2012). Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 29(1), 71–94.
9.
ChengC.C., & ChengW.Y. (2007). Customer-focused and product-line-based manufacturing performance measurement. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, 34, 1236–1245.
10.
ChengC.C., & KrumwiedeD. (2012). The role of service innovation in the market orientation—new service performance linkage. Technovation, 32(7), 487–497.
11.
ChoD.W., LeeY.H., AhnS.H., & HwangM.K. (2012). A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 801–818.
12.
DavisF.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
13.
DewhurstF.W., LorenteA.R.M., & RodriguezC.S. (2003). An initial assessment of the influence of IT on TQM: A multiple case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(4), 348–374.
14.
GooJ. (2010). Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement. Information System Frontiers, 12(2), 185–205.
15.
GrigoroudisN.E., OrfanoudakiE., & ZopounidisC. (2012). Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega, 40(1), 104–119.
16.
HairJ.F., BlackW.C., BabinB.J., AndersonR.E., & TathanR.L. (2008). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PHI Publication.
17.
HussainM.M., & GunasekaranA. (2002). Management accounting and performance measures in Japanese banks. Managing Service Quality, 12(4), 232–245.
18.
JunM., & CaiS. (2010). The key determinants of internet bank service quality: A content analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(7), 276–291.
19.
LarsoD., DoolenT., & HackerM. (2009). Development of a manufacturing flexibility hierarchy through factor and cluster analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(4), 417–441.
20.
LeeP.K.C., ChengT.C.E., YeungA.C.L., & LaiK.H. (2011). An empirical study of transformational leadership, team performance and service quality in retail banks. Omega, 39(6), 690–701.
21.
LeeY., KimS., & LeeH. (2011). The impact of service R&D on the performance of Korean information communication technology small and medium enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1), 77–92.
22.
LepmetsM., MesquidaA.L., CaterS.A., MasA., & RasE. (2014). The evaluation of the IT service quality measurement framework in industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(1), 39–57.
23.
LimaE.P., CostaS.E., GouveaD., AngelisJ.J., & MunikJ. (2013). Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(5), 524–542.
24.
MutulaS.M., & BrakeP.V. (2007). ICT skills readiness for the emerging global digital economy among small businesses in developing countries. Library Hi Tech, 25(2), 231–245.
25.
NaK.S., SimpsonJ.T., LiX., SinghT., & KimK.Y. (2007). Software development risk and project performance measurement: Evidence in Korea. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80(1), 596–605.
26.
NeedleD. (2006). Business in context: An introduction to business and its environment (4th ed., p. 26). Italy: G. Canale & C.
27.
NikM.N.E.M., & KamaruzzamanbS.P.N.M. (2011). Assessing the maintenance aspect of facilities management through a performance measurement system: A Malaysian case study. Procedia Engineering, 20(5), 329–338.
28.
NoorM.A.N.M., & AhmadN.H. (2012). The determinants of Islamic banks’ efficiency changes: Empirical evidence from the World banking sectors. Global Business Review, 13(2), 179–200.
29.
NudurupatiS., ArshadT., & TurnerT. (2007). Performance measurement in the construction industry: An action case investigating manufacturing methodologies. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 667–676.
30.
NudurupatiS.S., BititciU.S., KumarV., & ChanF.T.S. (2011). State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279–290.
31.
OjhaD., SalimathM., & D’SouzaD. (2014). Disaster immunity and performance of service firms: The influence of market acuity and supply network partnering. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(1), 385–397.
32.
RobinsonC., & MahonyM.O. (2003). The growth of ICT and industry performance. National Institute Economic Review, 184(60), 184.
SchmidbergerS., BalsL., HartmannE., & JahnsC. (2009). Ground handling services at European hub airports: Development of a performance measurement system for bench marking. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(1), 104–116.
35.
ShaikM.N., & AbdulK.W. (2014). Comprehensive performance measurement and causal-effect decision making model for reverse logistics enterprise. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 68(1), 87–103.
36.
SteigenbergerN. (2014). Only a matter of chance? How firm performance measurement impacts study. European Management Journal, 32, 46–65.
37.
TherrienP., & DavidD., & TylerC. (2011). Innovation novelty and (commercial) performance in the service sector: A Canadian firm-level analysis. Technovation, 31(12), 655–665.
38.
TrachtaK., NiesteggebA., & SchuhaP. (2013). Demand planning based on performance measurement systems in closed loop supply chains. Procedia CIRP, 12(3), 324–329.
39.
WainwrightD., & YarrowD. (2005). Towards a framework for benchmarking ICT practice, competence and performance in small firms. The International Journal for Library and Information Services, 6(1), 39–52.
40.
YeeR.W.Y., LeeP.K.C., YeungA.C.L., & ChengT.C.E. (2013). The relationships among leadership, goal orientation, and service quality in high-contact service industries: An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 452–464.
