In this article, we investigate whether or not nominal devaluation leads to real devaluation in Laos by using autoregressive-distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing and the Granger causality test in a vector error correction model (VECM) framework. Our empirical evidence shows that nominal devaluation Granger causes real devaluation in the short run and the long run. This finding implies that nominal devaluation leads to real devaluation.
Bahmani-OskooeeM. (1995). Nominal and real effective exchange rates for 22 LDCs: 1971: 1–1990: 4. Applied Economics, 27(7), 103–111.
2.
Bahmani-OskooeeM. (2001a). Nominal and real effective exchange rates of Middle Eastern countries and their trade performance. Applied Economics, 33(1), 103–111.
3.
Bahmani-OskooeeM. (2001b). How stable in M2 money demand function in Japan?Japan and the World Economy, 13(4), 455–461.
4.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.GelanA. (2006). Real and nominal effective exchange rates for African countries. Applied Economics, 39(8), 961–979.
5.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.GelanA. (2007). On the relation between nominal devaluation and real devaluation: Evidence from African countries. Journal of AfricanEconomies, 16(March), 177–197.
6.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.HarveyH. (2007). Real and nominal effective exchange rate for LDCs: 1971–2004. The International Trade Journal, 21(4), 385–416.
7.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.KandilM. (2007). Real and nominal effective exchange rates in MENA countries: 1970–2004. Applied Econometrics, 39(19), 2489–2501.
8.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.MitezaI. (2002). Do nominal devaluations lead to real devaluation in LDCs?Economics Letter, 74(3), 385–391.
9.
BentzenI.EngstedT. (2001). A revival of the autoregressive distributed lag model in estimating energy demand relationship. Energy, 26(1), 45–55.
10.
BoL. (2011). Annual Report 2010–2012, the Bank of Lao PRD. Vientiane: The Bank of Lao PDR.
11.
BrunoM. (1978). Exchange rates, import costs, and wage-price dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 379–403.
12.
ChansomphouV.IchibashiM. (2010). Foreign currency inflow, real exchange rate misalignment and export performance of Lao PDR. 12th International Convention of the East Asian Economic Association, 2–3 October, Seoul.
13.
ConnollyM.TaylorD. (1976). Exchange rate changes and neutralization: A test of the monetary approach applied to developed and developing countries. Economica, 46, 281–294.
14.
ConnollyM.TaylorD. (1979). Adjustment to devaluation with money and non-traded goods. Journal of International Economics, 6, 289–298.
15.
DickeyD.FullerW.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimates for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.
16.
DickeyD.FullerW.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
17.
EdwardsS. (1988). Exchange rate misalignment in developing countries. World Bank Occasional Papers, No. 2, New Series (p. 5). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
GhatakS.SiddikiJ. (2001). The use of ARDL approach in estimating virtual exchange rate in India. Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(5), 573–583.
19.
HolmesM.J. (2004). Can African countries achieve long-run real exchange rate depreciation through nominal exchange rate depreciation?South African Journal of Economics, 72(2), 305–323.
20.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
21.
KremersJ.J.EricsonN.R.DoladoJ.J. (1992). The power of cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 325–347.
22.
KyophilavongP. (2010). Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Dealing with multi currencies. In CapannelliG.MenonJ. (Eds), Dealing with multiple currencies in transitional economies (pp. 72–100). Manila: Asian Development Bank.
23.
KyophilavongP.ToyodaT. (2007). Unfavorable truth of currency integration—The case of Laos. Journal of Economic Sciences, 11(1), 1–17.
24.
LaysonS. (1983). Homicide and deterrence: Another view of the Canadian time-series evidence. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 16(1), 52–73.
25.
NarayanP.K. (2005). New evidence on purchasing power parity from 18 OECD countries. Applied Economics, 37(9), 1063–1071.
26.
OuattaraB. (2004). Modelling the long run determinants of private investment in Senegal. The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0413, Economics (p. 11). The University of Manchester.
27.
PesaranB.PesaranM.H. (2009). Time series econometrics using Microfit 5.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
PesaranM.H.ShinY.SmithR.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Economics, 16(3), 289–326.
29.
PhillipsP.C.PerronP. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
30.
ShahbazM. (2009). On nominal and real devaluations relation: An econometric evidence for Pakistan. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 9(1), 85–108.
31.
ShahbazM. (2010). Income inequality–economic growth and non-linearity: A case of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(8), 613–636.
32.
ShahbazM.RahmanM.M. (2012). The dynamic of financial development, imports, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Cointegration and causality analysis in Pakistan. Global Business Review, 13(2), 201–219.
33.
ShahbazM.JalilA.IslamF. (2012). Real exchange rate changes and the trade balance: The evidence from Pakistan. The International Trade Journal, 26(2), 139–153.
34.
TiwariA.K.ShahbazM. (2013). Modelling the relationship between whole sale price and consumer price indices: Cointegration and causality analysis for India. Global Business Review, 14, 397–411.
35.
VaubelR. (1976). Real exchange rate changes in the European community: The empirical evidence and its implications for European currency unification. WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, 112(3), 429–470.
36.
WahidA.N.M.ShahbazM. (2009). Does nominal devaluation precede real devaluation? The case of the Philippines. Transition Studies Review, 16(1), 47–61.