In the present article, an attempt has been made to revisit the debate on de-industrialization. The premise, which has been used by the author, is based on an historical fact regarding the organizational structure of production and distribution of handicrafts. The organization of production, which had provided competitive advantage to the Indian manufacturing to become one of the largest suppliers of manufactured goods, had emerged as a consequence of nexus between merchants and craftsmen. The organizational structure that emerged due to their nexus has been defined here as ‘Traditional Flexible Manufacturing’. It has been argued in this article that as long as the nexus between merchants and craftsmen continued to exist, Indian manufacturing had capability to produce abundant quantity of quality handicrafts to satisfy the demands of mass markets. The moment their nexus was broken Indian manufacturing experienced de-industrialization. The nexus, which enjoyed its peak during the Mughal Empire, was broken by the political ascendency of the East Indian Company.
BairochPaul (1982). International industrialization from 1750–1980. Journal of European Economic History, 32(2), 269–333.
2.
BhattacharyaS. (1982). Regional economy 1737–1857: The eastern India. In KumarDharmaDesaiMeghnath (Eds), Cambridge Economic History of India (Vol. II, pp. 270–331). Cambridge: Orient Longman and Cambridge University Press.
3.
BoltsWilliam (1998) [1772]. Consideration of India affair. In TuckPatrick (Ed.), The East India Company c. 1600–c. 1850. London: Rutledge.
4.
ChaudhuriK. N. (1979). Markets and traders in India during seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In ChowdhuryK. N.DewayC. J. (Eds), Economy and society—Essays in Indian economic and social history. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
ChowdhuryS. (1972). Merchants companies and rulers, Bengal in eighteenth century. Journal of Economic History of the Orient, 31(1), 71–85.
6.
ClarkC. (1950). Conditions of economic progress. London: Mac Millian.
7.
ClingingsmithD.WilliamsonJ. G. (2004). India’s de-industrialization under British rule, new ideas and new evidence. Working paper No. 10586, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, USA.
8.
DeweyC. (Ed.). (1988). Arrested development in India—The historical dimensions. New Delhi: Manohar.
9.
DirkNicholas B. (2006). The scandal of empire India and the creation of imperial Britain. Ranikhet, India: Permanent Black.
10.
DodwellH. (1922). Madras weavers under the company. Proceedings of the India Historical Research Committee.
11.
DuttR. (1906). The economic history of India in the Victorian age. London: Kegan Paul.
12.
FergusonNiall (2004). Empire: How Britain made the modern world. UK: Penguin.
13.
FindleyR.LundhalM. (2006). The first globalization episode: The creation of Mongol empire or the economics of Genghis Khan. In TherbornGoranKhondkerHabibul Haque (Eds), Asia and Europe in globalization, continents, regions and nations (pp. 13–54). Leiden, Boston: Brill.
14.
FrankA. G. (1998). Reorient the oriental global economy in the Asian age. New Delhi: Vistas Publication.
15.
FreudenbergerH.RedlickF. (1964). Industrial development of Europe: Reality, symbol and images. Kyklos, 17(2), 372–402.
16.
FurberH. (1970). John Company at work—A study of European expansion in the late eighteenth century. New York: Octagon.
17.
GrewalJ. S. (1995). The Sikhs of Punjab. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
HarnettyP. (1991). De-industrialization revised: The handloom weavers of central province of India. Modern Asian Studies, 25(3), 455–510.
19.
HobsbawmE. J. (1954). The general crises of European economy in the seventeenth century. Past and Present, 5, 33–53.
20.
HodgsonG. H. (1938). Thomas Parry—Free merchant. Madras: Higginbothams.
21.
KennyM.FloridaR. (1993). Beyond mass production. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
KnudsenD. C. (1996). The transition to flexibility. Hanwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Press.
23.
KriedteP.MedickH.SchlumbergerJ. (1981). Industrialization before industrial revolution (translated from German by Beate Schen). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KrishnamurthyJ. (1983). Occupational structure. In KumarDharma (Ed.), The Cambridge history of India c. 1757–c. 1970 (Vol. II), (pp. 533–552). Hyderabad: Cambridge University Press and Orient Longman.
25.
LevineD. (1977). Family formation in the age of nascent capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
26.
MaddisonA. (2003). The world economy—A new millennial perspective. New Delhi: Overseas Press.
27.
MarkovitsC. (2000). Colonialism and traditional crafts. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 39–40.
28.
MarshallP. J. (1957). The economic political expansion: The case of Awadh. Modern Asian Studies, 9(3), 465–482.
29.
MarshallP. K. (1978). Economic expansion—The case of Awadh. Modern Asian Studies, 9(4), 465–483.
30.
MarxK. (2006) [1853]. The British rule in India, New York Daily Tribune, June 25, 1853. In HasanIqbal (Ed.), Karl Marx on India. New Delhi: Aligarh Historians Society, Tulika book.
31.
MarxK. (1868/1961). Capital (Vol. I). Moscow: People’s Publishing House.
32.
McNiellWilliam H. (1989). The age of Gunpowder Empire: 1430–1800. Washington, DC: American Historical Associations.
33.
MendelsF. F. (1972). Proto-industrialization—First phase in industrialization process. Journal of Economic History, 32(2), 241–261.
34.
MendelsF. F. (1982). Proto-industrialization—Theory and reality. General Report, Economic History Congress, Budapest.
35.
NaorojiD. (1901–1962). Poverty and un-British rule of India (reprint). New Delhi: Government of India Press.
36.
NehruJ. (1947). The discovers of India. London: Meridian Books.
37.
OgilvieS.CermanM. (Eds) (1996). European proto-industrialization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
ParthasarathiP. (2001). The transition to a colonial economy—Weavers, merchants and kings in south India 1720–1800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PatelS. J. (1952). Agricultural labors in modern India and Pakistan. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
40.
PerlinF. (1983). Proto-industrialization and pre-colonial South Asia. Past and Present, 98(1), 30–95.
41.
PioreM. J.SabelC. F. (1984). Second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
42.
PrakashO. (1998). Trade and politics in eighteen century Bengal. In BlusseLeonardGeastraFemme (Eds), On the eighteen century as a category of Asian history: Van Leur in Retrospect. Aldershot: Sage Publication.
43.
PrakashO. (2007). From negotiation to coercion, textile manufacturing of in the eighteenth century. Modern Asian Studies, 41(6), 1331–1368.
44.
RobinsN. (2006). The corporation that changed the world—How the East India Company shaped the modern multinational. Hyderabad, India: Orient Longman.
45.
RobinsonH. (1912). The trade of East India Company from 1709–1813. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
RoyT. (1999). Traditional industry in the economy of colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RoyT. (2000). The economic history of India, 1857–1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
48.
RoyT. (2005). Rethinking change in India: Labour and livelihood. London and New York: Routledge.
49.
RoyT. (2010). Company of kinsman—Enterprise and community in South Asian history 1700–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
SethV. K. (2002). Primitive flexible to modern flexible manufacturing and the process of skilling and de-skilling of labour. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 45(4), 1175–1194.
51.
SethV. K. (2003). The beginning and the end of primitive flexible manufacturing. Journal of Management Research, 3(2), 73–86.
52.
SethV. K. (2008). Primitive flexible manufacturing and Mughal empire. Journal of Management Research, 8(2), 76–95.
53.
SethV. K. (2012). The East India Company—As a case study in corporate governance. Global Business Review, XIII(2), 221–238.
54.
SimmonsC. C. (1985). ‘De-industrialization’, industrialization and the Indian economy C. 1850–C. 1947. Modern Asian Studies, 19(4), 593–672.
55.
SinghB. (1966). European agency houses in Bengal. Calcutta, India: Firma Mukhopadhyaya.
56.
SinhaN. K. (1968). The economic history of Bengal (Vol. III). Calcutta: Firma K. Mukhopadhyay.
57.
SteinB. (1985). State formation and economy reconsidered. Modern Asian Studies, 19(3), 387–413.
58.
ThornerD. (1962). ‘De-industrialization’ India 1881–1931. In ThornerDanielThornerAlice (Eds), Land and labour in India, (pp. 102–134). Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
59.
TillyC.TillyR. (1971). Agenda for European economic history in 1970s. Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 176–196.
60.
TripathiD. (2004). The Oxford history of Indian business. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
61.
WilliamK., et al. (1987). The end of mass production economy and society. Economy & Society, 16(3), 405–439.
62.
WinkA. (1985). Land sovereignty in Indian agrarian society and politics under Maratha Savrajya. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WomackJ. P.JonesD. J. (1996). Lean thinking, banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
64.
WomackJ. P., . (1990). Machines that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York: Rawson Associates.
