This article reports the development and validation of a student engagement scale (SES), as tested on a sample of 166 respondents from a management school located in the National Capital Region (NCR). The SES is a 41-item self-reporting questionnaire that measures three facets of student engagement namely, sense of belonging, individual engagement and collaborative engagement. The sub-scales had high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. All the three dimensions of student engagement were positively and significantly related to management skill, a criterion variable. Regression analysis revealed that individual engagement and collaborative engagement explained a significant amount of variance in management skill. Thus, the engagement scales demonstrated predictive validity. The usage of engagement scales for educational practices is discussed and future research directions are highlighted.
CariniR. M.KuhG. D.KleinS. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 7(1), 1–32.
2.
CoatesH. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. Retrieved from cqu.eblib.com:http://www.cqu.eblib.com.exproxy.cqu.edu.au/EBLWeb/patron/ (accessed on 9 January 2013).
3.
CoatesH. (2010). Development of the Australian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 60(1), 1–17.
4.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) (2010). CCSSE 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ccsse.org (accessed on 12 May).
5.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) (2006). FSSE 2006. Retrieved from http://www.fsse.iub.edu/html/fsse_survey_options.cfm (accessed on 2 February 2009).
6.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) (2010). FSSE 2010. Retrieved from fsse.iub/_/?cid=13 (accessed on 12 May 2013).
7.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
8.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
9.
FredricksJ. A.McColskeyW. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In ChristensonS.A.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds), Handbook of research on student handbook (pp. 763–782). New York: Springer.
10.
JimersonS. R.CamposE.GreifJ. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.
11.
JoyceB. (1991). Common misconceptions about cooperative learning and gifted students. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 72–74.
12.
KrauseK.CoatesH. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year University. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 227–304.
13.
KrishnamurthyR. C. (2004). Network based teaching and learning. Delhi: Authors Press.
14.
KuhG. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17, 66.
15.
KuhG. D. (2007). How to help students achieve. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(41), B12–13.
16.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-impact practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
17.
KuhG. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.
18.
MillerR. (2003). Student satisfaction and institutional success. 43rd annual AIR Forum. Tampa, FL, May2003.
19.
MohapatraM.SharmaB. R. (2010). Study of employee engagement and its predictors in an Indian public sector undertaking. Global Business Review, 11(2), 281–301.
20.
MoliniJ. M.HuonkerJ. W. (2010). Diagnosing student engagement in the business school classroom. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, (Fall), 1–13.
21.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Center for Postsecondary Research.
22.
NewmannF. M. (1986). Priorities for the future: Toward a common agenda. Social Education, 50(4), 240–250.
23.
QuimetJ. A.SmallwoodR. A. (2005). CLASSE—the class-level survey of student engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13–15.
24.
ReschlyA.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Research leading to a predictive model of dropout and completion among students with mild disabilities and the role of student engagement. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292.
25.
SharmaB. R.KhandelwalS.NinghoujamS. (2012). The level of student engagement and search for its predictors: An exploratory study of MBA students. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 11(2), 66–81.
26.
SharmaB. R.BhaumikP. K. (2013). Student engagement and its predictors: An exploratory study in an Indian business school. Global Business Review, 14(1), 25–42.
27.
SinghA. K.SrivastavaS. (2013). Certain antecedents and consequence of student engagement in an Indian management education setting. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 12(1), 47–64.
28.
SlavinR. E. (1991). Are cooperative learning and ‘untracking’ harmful to the gifted?Educational Leadership, 48(6), 68–70.
29.
South African Survey of Student Engagement (SASSE). (2010). SASSE 2010. Retrieved from http://sasse.ufs.ac.za (accessed on 12 May 2013).
30.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (ed. 2nd). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
VaduvaS. A.FoteaI. S.CorceaM.LazerM. (2011). Beyond satisfaction: Engaging students and faculty in a Romanian business school. Marketing Management Journal, 21(1), 207–213.
32.
VoelklK. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of School, 105, 204–319.
33.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
ZhaoC.KuhG. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.
