This article describes a theoretical way of understanding business enterprise, for what it is used the stakeholder theory as a theory of the firm. Thus, the purpose of this article is to show an innovative perspective called ontological perspective of stakeholders that relies on a phenomenological model where the subjective perspective of agents is the key, from a purely monetarist model to an economic, social and emotional value creation model, and from a deductive model of stakeholder interests to an inductive model. The main contributions are: add a new perspective to the different classifications made of stakeholder theory, avoid monetarist reductionism under the concept of value in a way that the manager takes into account all interconnected interests of stakeholders, and finally prioritize interests map instead of roles map without accepting the assumption that the role involves joint and no conflicting interests.
AgleB.R.DonaldsonT.FreemanR.E.JensenM.C.MitchellR.K.WoodD. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(12), 153–190.
2.
AlchianA.DemsetzH. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
3.
AlchianA.KesselR.A. (1962). Competition, monopoly, and the pursuit of money. In LewisH.G. (Ed.), Aspects of labor economics (pp. 157–183). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AsherC.C.MahoneyJ.M.MahoneyJ.T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(1), 5–32.
5.
BermanS.L.WicksA.C.KothaS.JonesT.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The e-relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
6.
BurnsT.StalkerG.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
7.
CarneyM.GedajlovicE.SurS. (2011). Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(3), 483–507.
8.
ChesbroughH. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
ChesbroughH.VanhaverbekeW.WestJ. (2008). Open innovation: Researching a new Paradigm. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
CoaseR.M. (1937). The nature of the firm. Ecomica, New Series, 4(1), 386–405.
11.
DavisP. (2008). Innovation white-paper. New York: Scanlon Leadership Network.
12.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
FreemanR.E.HarrisonJ.S.WicksA. (2008). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
FreemanR.E.RetolazaJ.L.San-JoseL.CanalesF. (2012). La aplicabilidad de la teoría de los stakeholders: El caso Etxanobe, Working Paper Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa, disponible en: www.ieae.net.
16.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FurubotnE.G.PejovichS. (1972). Property rights and economic theory: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 10(4), 1137–1162.
18.
GoodpasterK.E. (1991). Business ethic and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.
19.
GouldR.W. (2012). Open innovation and stakeholder engagement. Journal of Technology, Management and Innovation, 7(3), 1–11.
20.
GuptaA.D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and strategy: A bird’s eye view. Global Business Review, 13(1), 153–165.
21.
HamelG. (2003). Leading the revolution: How to thrive in turbulent times by making innovation a way of life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
HerzbergF. (1976). The managerial choice: To be efficient and to be human. Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones Irwin.
23.
HullF.HageJ. (1982). Organizing for innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker’s organic type. Sociology, (November), 16(4), 564–577.
24.
JensenM.MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
25.
JensenM.C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 235–256.
26.
JensenM.C. (2008). Non-rational behaviour, value conflicts, stakeholder theory, and firm behaviour. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 167–171.
27.
KanterR.M. (1983). The change masters. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
28.
KimJ.MahoneyJ.T. (2005). Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: An organizational economics approach to strategy management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 223–242.
29.
MaslowA. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
30.
MattenD.CraneA. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.
31.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
32.
MintzbergH. (1983). Power in and around organisations. Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
MintzbergH.AhlstrandB.LampelJ. (1998). Strategy safari. New York, NY: The Free Press. [Traducción al castellano: Safari a la Estrategia. Buenos Aires, 1999: Granica.]
34.
MitchellR.K.AgleB.R.WoodD.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
35.
NeronP.Y.NormanW. (2008). Citizenship, Inc.: Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.
36.
PfefferJ. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37.
PorterM. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Chicago, IL: Free Press.
38.
RetolazaJ.L.JoseL. (2011). Social economy and stakeholder theory, an integrative framework for socialization of the capitalism. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 73 (Special Issue), 193–211.
39.
RetolazaJ.L.RuizM.San-JoseL. (2009). CSR in business start-ups: An application method for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 324–336.
40.
San-JoseL.RetolazaJ.L. (2012). Participation of stakeholders in corporate governance: Foundation ontological and methodological proposal. Universitas Psychologica, 11(2), 619–628.
41.
SegrestinB.HatchuelA. (2011). Beyond agency theory, a post-crisis view of corporate law. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 484–499.
42.
SinhaR. (2006). Corporate governance and shareholder value analysis. Global Business Review, 7(1), 1–16.
43.
TheilenB. (2002). Innovación y estructura organizativa de la empresa, Havard Deusto Business Review, 108(mayo-junio), 68–76.
44.
WilliamsonO.E. (1963). Managerial discretion and business behaviour. American Economic Review, 53(5), 1032–1057.
45.
WolfeR.A.PutlerD.S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups?Organization Science, 13(1), 64–80.
