The success of any outsourced activity depends on the selection of right vendor and its relationship with the firm (Arshad et al., 2008). The selection of the right vendor is the most difficult challenge for the outsourcing firm. The study examines the client–vendor relationship of outsourcing firm and its affect on the firm’s financial performance. The study is primarily based on first-hand information gathered from managers of medium-scale firms. The data has been collected through schedule. Based on theoretical considerations, a model has been proposed linking the client–vendor relation and the cost and quality of the product with the firm’s financial performance. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis empirically tested and validated the underlying scales, namely, client–vendor relationship scale and financial performance scale. Structural equation modelling was employed to test the model. Data analysis revealed that there is significant impact of client–vendor relationship on firm’s financial performance as well as on cost and quality of the product. Further, direct and indirect effect of client–vendor relation, cost and quality on financial performance has been discovered.
AggarwalS.GoswamiK.ChatterjeeB. (2010). Evolution of offshore outsourcing in India. Global Business Review, 11(2), 239–256.
2.
AlborzS.SedonaB.ScheepersR.A. (2004). Model for studying IT outsourcing relationships. 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, South Australia, 1297–1313. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.14.
3.
AndersonJ.GerbingW. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two stage approach. Psychological Bulletin, 27(1), 5–24
4.
ApplebaumSH.SamahaA. (2008). Business process outsourcing: Lessons from case studies in India, Poland and Canada. Journal of Business Case Studies, 4(2), 37–54. Retrieved from www.mosaicprojects.com.au
5.
ArshadN.H.LinY.M.MohamedA.UdinA.B. (2008). Service delivery in ICT outsourcing: Relationship intensity between vendor and client. Retrieved from apps.intan.my/psimr/vol2.2/article%204%20–%20noor%20habibah%20n%20group.pdf
6.
BagozziR.P. (1980). Causal Models in Marketing. New York: Wiley.
7.
BagozziR.P.PhillipsL.W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 2(3), 459–489.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173>–1182.
10.
BenderP. (1999). Cashing in on competition. Outsourcing Journal. Retrieved from www.outsourcing.journal.com/dec1999.insight.html.issues
11.
BhuniaA.MukhutiS.S.RoyS.G. (2011). Financial performance analysis: A case study. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 269–275.
12.
BlumenbergS.BeimbornD.SebastianF.M.BranimirB.ClemensG.StefanW. (2009). Determinants of outsourcing success in the financial industry: The impact of importance. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
13.
BolatT.YilmuzO. (2009). The relationship between outsourcing and organizational performance. Is it myth or reality for the hotel sector?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(1), 7–23.
14.
BourneL. (2002). The forgotten stakeholders: Forming team in an outsourced IT environment. Retrieved from http://mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF_Papers/P022_Forgotten_Stakeholders.pdf
Colliers International Research. (2011). House View for 2012, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.colliers.com.au/FindResearch/~/media/Files/Corporate/Research/Speciality%20Reports%20and%20Property%20White%20Papers/Specialty%20Report.ashx
17.
CronbachL. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrical, 16(3), 297–234.
18.
CundenM. (2008). The impact of the IT outsourcing relationship on the success of the venture: A research agenda. Retrieved from is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20080215.pdf
19.
CurrieW.WillicocksL.P. (1997). New strategies in IT outsourcing: Major trends and global best practice. London: Report Business Intelligence Ltd.
20.
DemirbagM.KohS.C.TatogluE.ZaimS. (2006). TQM and market orientation’s impact on SMEs’ Performance. Industrial Management and DataSystems, 106(8), 1206>–1228.
21.
DessG.RobinsonR. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273.
22.
ElmutiD. (2003). The perceived impact of outsourcing on organizational performance. Mid-American Journal of Business, 18(2), 33–41.
23.
FanY. (2000). Strategic outsourcing: Evidence from British companies. Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18(4), 213–219.
24.
FornellC.LarckerF.D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
25.
FuentesM.JavierL.M.LuisM.F. (2006). Total quality management, strategic orientation and organizational performance: The case of Spanish companies. Journal of Total Quality Management, 17(3), 303–323.
26.
GilleyM.RasheedA. (2000). Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effect on firm’s performance. Journal of Management, 26(4), 763–790.
27.
GolesT.ChinW.W. (2002). Relational exchange theory and IS outsourcing: Developing a scale to measure relationship factor. In HirschheimR.HeinzlA.DibbernJ. (Eds.) Information Systems Outsourcing (pp. 221–250). Springer, Berlin, Germany.
28.
HairJ.F.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L.WilliamC.B. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. U.K.: Pearson Education, Inc.
29.
HonrenC.T.SundemG.L.StrattonW.O. (2006). Introduction to management accounting, U.K.: Pearson Education, Inc.
30.
KakabadseA.KakabadseN. (2002). Trends in outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe. European Management Journal, 20(2), 189–198.
31.
KannanV.R.TanK.C. (2003). Attitudes of US and European managers to supplier selection and assessment and implications for business performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(5), 472–484.
32.
KediaB.L.LahiriS. (2007). International outsourcing of services: A partnership model. Journal of International Management, 13(1), 22–37.
33.
KernT.WillicoksL. (2002). Exploring relationships in IT outsourcing: The interaction approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 3–19.
34.
KlepperR.JonesW.O. (1998). Outsourcing information technology systems and services. NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
35.
KotlerP.ArmstrongG. (2008). Principle of marketing. U.K.: Pearson Education, Inc.
36.
KrasnikovA.JayachandranS.KumarV. (2009). The impact of customer relationship management implementation on cost and profit efficiencies: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 61–76.
37.
KrishnaS.SahayS.WalshamG. (2004). Managing cross cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 62–66.
38.
KumarU.KumarV.ButtI. (2010). Manufacturing capability, manufacturing strategy and firms performance. Amity Global Business Review, 5(1), 77–94.
39.
LacityM.HirschheimR. (1993). Information systems outsourcing—Myths, metaphors and realities. New York: Wiley.
40.
LeeJ.N.HuynhM.Q.HirscheimR. (2008). An integrative model of trust on IT outsourcing: Examining a bilateral perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(2), 145–163.
41.
LeeJ.N.KimY.G. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29–61.
42.
LeeC.LeeK.PenningsJ.M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 615–640.
43.
LeeS. (2010). Global outsourcing: A different approach to an understanding sport labour migration. Global Business Review, 11(2), 153–165.
44.
LiuY.XuJ.WeitzB.A. (2011). The role of emotional expression and mentoring in internship learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(1), 94–110.
45.
MacCallumR.C.AustinJ.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–26. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751970
46.
MaigaA.S.JacobsF.A. (2006). Assessing the impact of benchmarking antecedents on quality improvement and its financial consequences. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 18(1), 97–123.
47.
McivorR.HumphreyP.K.WallA.P.MckittrickA. (2008). A study of performance measurement in the outsourcing decision. CIMA management accounting guide on outsourcing the finance and accounting function, 4(3), 1–12. Retrieved from www.cimaglobal.com/documents/thought_leadership_docs/cid_ressum_a_study_of_performance_measurement)in_the_outsourcing_decesion_dec08.pdf
48.
MitraS., (2007). India as the global outsourcing destination: A critical view of the future. Global Business Review, 8(1), 69–86.
49.
MoonJ.SwarB.ChoeY.C.ChungM.JungG.H. (2010). Innovation in IT outsourcing relationships—Where is the best practice of IT outsourcing in the public sector. Innovation: Management, Polıcy & Practıce, 12(2), 217–226.
50.
MorrisP.W. (2003). Quality and competitive advantage: An empirical study of ISO 9000 Adoption in the electronics industry. Published dissertation. Retrieved from http://repositories.tdl.org/ttuir/bitstream/handle/2346/20215/31295017074997.pdf?sequence=1
51.
NagB., (2004). Business process outsourcing: Impact and implications. Retrieved from www.unescap–org/pdd/publications/…05/bulletin04–05_cl4.pdf
52.
NambiarB. (2011). IT outsourcing and India. Retrieved from www.emergence.nu/events/brussels/outsource.pdf
53.
NunuallyJ.C. (1970). Introduction to Psychological Measurement. New York: McGraw Hill.
54.
O’Leary-KellyS.W.VokurkaR.J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405.
55.
OlsenR.F.EllramL.M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 101–113.
56.
PhillipsL.D.BuzzellR. (1983). Product quality, cost position, and business performance: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 47(2), 26–43.
57.
PhippsR.MerisostisJ. (2005). Is outsourcing part of the solution to the higher education cost dilemma. Retrieved from www.aramarkhighered.com
58.
RaibornC.A.ButlerJ.B.MassoudM.F. (2009). Outsourcing support functions: Identifying and managing the good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 52(4), 347–356.
SharmaR.D.JyotiJ. (2006). Job satisfaction among school teachers. IIMB Management Review, 18(4), 349–363.
61.
StefanieL.PhilipY.KensingtonW.KrcmarH. (2010). Relational governance mediates the effect of formal contracts on BPO performance. 18th European Conference on Information Systems Technology, 5(4), 203–244.
62.
SudanaI.P. (2011). Organizational culture and strategic cost reduction. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unud.ac.id/abstrak/putu%20sudana.pdf
63.
TeeravaraprugJ. (2008). Outsourcing and vendor selection model based on Taguchi loss function. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 30(4), 523–530.
64.
UekawaK. (2010). OLS—Definition. Retrieved from www.estat.us/sas/ols.doc
65.
VenkatramanN.RamanujamV. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.
66.
VenkatramanN.RamanujamV. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of management, 13(4), 109–122.
67.
YasinO.KemalA. (2009). Impact of information technology outsourcing on organisational performance: A firm level empirical analysis. 17th European Conference on Information System. Retrieved from www.ecis2009.it/papers/ecis2009–0234.pdfs
68.
ZappalaS. (2000). Outsourcing and human resource management: A discussion starter. Retrieved from www.econ.usyd.edu.au/acirrt/
