All organizations need a constant monitoring on the environmental turbulence in order to gain sustained competitive advantage. Particularly the strategies of the organizations have to be reframed to overcome the impact of any change. This article applied multiple discriminant analysis to determine the difference between the strategies of differently owned organizations in India and to determine strategies accounting the most for the differences in the organizations. The results predict that employee relations was the most contributing variable for discrimination followed by implementation of business strategies, training and development, compensation, performance management, HR strategies, perception about HR managers and HR planning. The study contributes to Indian organizations as well as foreign MNCs which operate in India to accommodate multiple constituents’ perception while drafting their future strategic plans.
AgarwalaT. (2003). Innovation human resource practices and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 175–273.
2.
ArmstrongM.BaronA. (2005). Handbook of Strategic HRM. Mumbai: Jaico Publishing House.
3.
ArthurJ.B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American Steel Minimills. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 45, 488–506.
4.
ArthurJ.B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687.
5.
BambergerP.PhilipsB. (1991). Organizational environment and business strategy: Parallel vessels conflicting influences on human resource strategy in the pharmaceutical industry. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 153–182.
6.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 88–120.
7.
BeckerB.E.HuselidM.A. (1999). Overview: Strategic human resource management in fine leading firms. Human Resource Management, 38(4), 287–301.
8.
BjorkmanI.BudhwarP. (2007). When in Rome? Human resource management and the performance of foreign firms operating in India. Employee Relations, 29(6), 595–610.
9.
BouldingK.E. (1956). General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.
10.
BrislinR.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
11.
BuchananD. (1987). Job enrichment is dead: Long live high-performance work design. Personnel Management, May, 40–43.
12.
BudhwarP.S. (2001). Doing business in India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(4), 549–568.
13.
BudhwarP.S.LutharH.K.BhatnagarJ. (2006). The dynamics of HRM systems in Indian BPO firms. Journal of Labour Research, 27(3), 339–360.
14.
ConnerK. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?Journal of Management, 17, 121–154.
15.
CooperD.R.SchindlerP.S. (2003). Business research methods. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Edition.
16.
CosteaE.S. (2005). The challenges of human resource management towards organizational effectiveness: A comparative study in Southern EU. Journal of European Industrial Training. 29(2), 112–134. Available at Emerald insight. http://Emeraldinsight.com (accessed on 16 January 2006).
17.
Dasborough (2006). Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17,163–178.
18.
DelaneyJ.T.HuselidM.A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969.
19.
DeleryJ.E.DotyD.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency and Configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.
20.
GuestD.E. (1999). Human resource management and performance—The worker’s verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3), 5–25.
21.
GuthrieJ.P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180–270.
22.
Hair, JrJ.F.BushR.P.OrtinauD.J. (2003). Marketing research: Within a changing information environment. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
23.
HarelG.H.TzafrirS.S. (1999). The effect of human resource management practices on the perceptions of organizational and market performance of the firm. Human Resource Management. 38, 185–200.
24.
HuangT.C. (2001). The effects of Linkage between business and human resource management strategies. Personnel Review, 30(2), 132–183.
25.
HuselidM.A.JacksonS.E.SchulerR.S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinates of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171–189. Available at: Emerald insight. http://emeraldinsight.com (accessed on 16 January 2006)
26.
JonesG. (1984). Task visibility, free riding and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology and employee behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
27.
JonesG.WrightP.M. (1992). An economic approach to conceptualizing the utility of human resources. In FerrisG.RowlandK. (Eds), Research in personnel and human tesources (pp. 271–300). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
28.
KatouA.A.BudhwarP.S. (2006). Human resource management systems and organizational performance: A test of mediating model in the Greek manufacturing context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1223–1276.
29.
JonesG.WrightP.M. (2007). The effect of human resource management policies on organizational performance in Greek manufacturing firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(1), 1–35.
30.
KochanT.A.BarocciT.A. (1985). Human resource management and industrial relations. Boston: Little Brown.
31.
KatzD.KahnR. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
32.
KunduS.C.PuniaB.K. (2002). Management challenges and HRD intervention for future organizations. Prestige Journal of Management and research, 6(2), 82–89.
33.
MarchingtonM.WilkinsonA. (1996). Core personnel and development. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
MillerP. (1987). Strategic industrial relations and human resource management: Distinction, definition and recognition. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 101–109.
36.
MowdayR. (1984). Strategies for adapting to high rates of employee turnover. Human Resource Management, 23, 365–380.
37.
PaloS.PadhiN. (2005). How HR professionals drive TQM: A case study in an Indian organization. The TQM Magazine, 17(5), 467–485.
38.
PattersonM.G.WestM.A.LawthomR.NickellS. (1997). The impact of people management practices on business performance. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
39.
PenroseE.T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
40.
PfefferJ. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
PfefferJ. (1998). Seven practices of successful organization. California Management Review, 40(2), 96–124.
42.
PilF.K.MacDuffieJ.P. (1999). Organizational and environmental factors influencing the use and diffusion of high-involvement work practices. In CappelliP. (Ed.), Employment practices and business strategy (pp. 81–106). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
PurcellJ. (1995). Corporate strategy and its links with human resource management Strategy. In StoreyJ. (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text. London: Routledge.
44.
RajiniG. (2011). Strategic human resource management. Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG.
45.
RajiniG.GomathiS. (2009). An insight of theories of strategic human resource management. Journal of Management Thought and Practice, 1(2), 1–19.
46.
RajiniG.GomathiS. (2010). Strategic imperative of human resource leadership competencies. International Journal of Learning and Change, 4(2), 147–163.
47.
RobinsS.P. (2003). Organizational behaviour. 10th edn. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.
48.
RothwellW.J. (1996). Strategic Human Resource Leader. Mumbai: Jaico Publishing House.
49.
RothwellW.J.PrescottP.K.TaylorM.W. (1999). Strategic HR leader how to prepare your organization for the six key trends shaping the future. Bombay: Jaico Publishing House.
50.
SaberS.N.DowlingP.J.LieschP.W. (1998). The role of human resource management in international joint ventures: A study of Australian-Indian joint ventures. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 751–817.
51.
SainiD.S. (2000). Globalization and developments in human resource management. In SainiD. S.KhanS. A. (Eds), Human resource management: Perspectives for the new era (pp. 46–60). London: SAGE.
52.
SchulerR. (1989). Strategic human resource management. Human Relations, 42(2), 157–184.
53.
SchulerR. (1992). Linking the people with the strategic needs of the business. Organisational Dynamics, 4, 18–32.
54.
SchulerR.S.JacksonS.E. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 207–219.
55.
SheppeckM.A.MilitelloJ. (2000). Strategic HR configurations and organizational performance. Human Resource Management, 39(1), 5–16.
56.
SinghS. (2003). HRD in public sector undertakings: New directions. Management and Labor studies, 28(1), 37–46.
57.
SmilanskyJ. (1997). The new HR. New York: International Thomson Business Press.
58.
SnellS.A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292–328. Available at: Emerald insight. http://emeraldinsight.com (accessed on 16 January 2006)
59.
SomA. (2003). Redesigning the human resources function at Lafarge. Human Resource Management. 42(3), 271–288. Available at: Emerald insight. http://emeraldinsight.com (accessed on 16 January 2006)
60.
TsuiA.S. (1987). Defining the activities and effectiveness of the human resource department: A multiple constituency approach. Human Resource Management, 26, 35–69.
61.
TysonS.YorkA. (1996). Human resource management. London, UK: A Division of Reed Educational & Professional Publishing Ltd.
62.
Venakata RatnamC.S. (1998). Multinational companies in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 567–656.
63.
VirmaniB.R. (2004). Performance culture—The Indian prespective. In SuriG.K.RatnamC.S. VenkataGuptaN. K. (Eds), Performance measurement and management (pp. 39–55). New Delhi: Excel books.
64.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
65.
WrightP.M.Mc MahanG.C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic Human Resource Management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–321.
66.
WrightP.M.SnellS.A. (1991). Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 1(3), 203–225.
67.
YanadoriY.MarlerJ.H. (2006). Compensation strategy: Does business strategy influence compensation in high-technology firms?Strategic Management Journal, 27, 559–570.
68.
YoundtM.A.SnellS.A.Dean, JrJ.W.LepakD.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 836–865.
69.
ZeffaneR.MayoG. (1994). Rightsizing: The strategic human resource management challenge of the 1990s. Management Decision. 32(9), 5–9. [Online] Available from: emerald insight. http://emeraldinsight.com (accessed on 17 January 2006)
