The current study contributes to the existing literature by examining the psychometric properties of Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS). Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out on the responses of public and private sector employees working in various sectors of service industries of Jammu region (India) using AMOS 16 Software package against the various dimensions of DUWAS. The results provide support for the first-order a priori 3-factor, 20-item DUWAS scale which collectively comprised second order factor called workaholism.
AdamsDennis A.NelsonRyan R.ToddPeter A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
2.
AncaraniA.Di MauroC.GiammancoM.D. (2009). How are organizational climate models and patient satisfaction related? A competing value framework approach. Social Science and Medicine, 69(12), 1813–1818.
3.
AndreassenC.S.UrsinH.EriksenH.R. (2007). The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health. Psychology and Health, 22(5), 615–629.
4.
AstridJ.S.F. Visschers-PleijersDianaH.J.M. DolmansInekeH. A.P. WolfhagenCeesP.M. Van Der Vleuten (2005). Development and validation of a questionnaire to identify learning-oriented group interactions in PBL. Medical Teacher, 27(4), 375–381.
5.
BalaV. (2010). A study on job stress among the employees of banking sector in trichy region. Retrieved from http://www.oppapers.com/essays/A-Study-On-Job-Stress-AmOng/437059 (accessed on 12 June 2011).
6.
BentlerP.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–461.
7.
BentlerP.M.BonettD.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
8.
BurkeR.J. (1999). Workaholism among women managers: Work and life satisfactions and psychological well- being. Equal Opportunities International, 18(7), 25.
9.
BurkeR.J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: Psychological and physical well-being consequences. Stress Medicine, 16, 11–16.
10.
ChauPatrick Y.K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information System, 13(2), 185–204.
11.
CheungG.W.RensvaldR.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 233–255.
12.
CurranP.J.WestS.G.FinchJ.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
13.
DanielL.G. (1998). Statistical significance testing: A historical overview of misuse and misinterpretation with implications for the editorial policies of educational journals. Mid South Educational Research Association, 5(2), 23–32.
14.
DollWilliam J.WeidongXiaTorkzadehGholamreza (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461.
15.
FasselD. (1990). Working ourselves to death: The high costs of workaholism, the rewards of recovery. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.
16.
FlowersC.RobinsonB.E. (2002). A structural and discriminate analysis of the work addiction risk test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 517–526.
17.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
18.
FurnhamA. (1997). The psychology of behaviour at work. Hove: Psychology Press.
19.
GefenD.KarahannaE.StraubD.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
20.
GoldA.H.MalhotraA.SegarsA.H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information System18(1), 185–214.
21.
HairJ.F.BlackW.C.BabinB.J.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L. (2008). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Delhi: Pearson Education Inc. Publisher.
22.
HammerA.ErnstmannN.OmmenO.WirtzM.ManserT.PfeifferY.PlaffHolger (2011). Psychometric properties of the hospital survey on patient safety culture for hospital management (HSOPS_M). BMC Health Survey Research, 11, 165.
23.
HarpazItzhakXuanningFu. (2002). The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change. Human Relations, 55(6), 639–667.
24.
HartwickJ.LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
25.
HarveyR.J.BillingsR.NilanK.J. (1985). Confirmatory factor analysis of the job diagnostic survey: Good news and bad news. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 461–468.
26.
HenryJ.W.StoneR.W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21–33.
27.
HongS.MalikM.L.LeeM.K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636–654.
28.
HongSee-JoonThong, JamesY.L.TamYan Kar (2006). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1819–1834.
29.
KanaiA.WakabayashiM.FilingS. (1996). Workaholism among employees in Japanese corporations: An examination based on the Japanese version of the workaholism scales. Japanese Psychological Research, 38, 192–203.
30.
KarimJ.WeiszR. (2010). Emotional labour, emotional intelligence and psychological distress. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 36(2), 187–196.
31.
KhanM.M.AhmedI.NawazM.M. (2011). Student’s perspective of service quality in higher learning institutions: An evidence based approach. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(11).
32.
LibanoM.D.LlorensS.SalanovaM.SchaufeliW. (2010). Validity of a brief workaholism scale. Psicothema, 22, 143–150.
33.
MachlowitzM. (1980). Workaholics: Living with them, working with them. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
34.
MarieMcHughShirleyBrennan (1994). Managing the stress of change in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(5), 29–41.
35.
MarshH.W.HocevarD.A. (1988). New, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analysis: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 107–117.
36.
McMillanL.H.W.O’DriscollM.P. (2004). Workaholism and health: Implications for organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 509–519.
37.
McMillanL.H.W.BradyE.C.O’DriscollM.P.MarshN.V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of spence and robbins (1992) Workaholism battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 357–368.
38.
McMillanL.H.W.O’DriscollM.P.BurkeR.J. (2003). Workaholism: A review of theory, research and future directions. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 167–89). New York: Wiley.
39.
MilfontTaciano L.DuckittJohn (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: A first and second order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 289–303.
40.
MirallesM.D.A. (2011). Journey into the heart of workaholism: Empirical findings from several multiple sample studies. Retrieved from http://tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/31920/dellibano.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 11 August 2011).
41.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw Hill.
42.
OatesW.E. (1968). On being a workaholic: A serious jest. Pastoral Psychology, 19, 16–20.
43.
OnyeizugboE.U.NwaforC.E. (2010). Construct validation of nurses’ self–concept questionnaire in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 467–474.
44.
PodsakoffP.M.MacKenzieS.B.LeeJ-Y.PodsakoffN.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
45.
RivardS.PoirierG.RaymondL.BergeronF. (2003). Development of a measure to assess the quality of user-developed applications. Cashier GRESI 93(08) HEC-Montreal, 1–16.
46.
RobinsonB.E. (1999). The work addiction risk test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199–210.
47.
RobinsonB.E. (2000). Workaholism: Bridging the gap between workplace, socio-cultural, and family research. Journal of Employment Counselling, 37(1), 3.
48.
SaadeRaafatBahliBouchaib (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42, 317–327.
49.
SchaufeliW.B. (2004). http://www.schaufeli.com
50.
SchaufeliW.B.BakkerA.B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.
51.
SchaufeliW.B.TarisT.RhenenW. (2008). Workaholism, burnout and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173–203.
52.
SchaufeliW.B.TarisT.W.BakkerA. (2006). Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In BurkeR. (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA.
53.
SiedleckiK.L.HonigL.S.SternY. (2008). Exploring the structure of a neuropsychological battery across healthy elders and those with questionable dementia and alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 22(3), 400–411.
54.
SpenceJ.T.RobbinsA.S. (1992). Workaholism definition, measurement and preliminary result. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178.
55.
SpretitzerG.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
56.
SuriS.AroraN. (2009). Work culture and occupational stress in Indian organizations. ASBM Journal of Management, 2(1), 80–88.
57.
TarisT.W.SchaufeliW.B.VerhoevenL.C. (2005). Workaholism in the Netherlands: Measurement and implications for job strain and work-nonwork conflict. Applied Psychology: In International Review, 54(1), 37–60.
58.
TourangeauAnn E.LindaMcGillisHallDianeDoranM.TeresaPetch (2006). Measurement of nurse job satisfaction using the McCloskey/Mueller satisfaction scale. Nursing Research, 55(2), 128–136.
59.
WestS.G.FinchJ.F.CurranP.J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
60.
WheatonB.B.MuthenB.AlwinD.F.SummersG.F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In HeiseD. R. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
61.
WhiteM.HillS.McGovernP.MillsC.SmeatonD. (2003). High performance management practices, working hours and work-life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 175–196.
62.
YangB.WatkinsK.E.MarsickV.J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Human Resource Development Quaterly, 15(1), 31–56.
63.
YuanK.M.BentlerP.M. (2004). On Chi-square difference and 2 tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is mis-specified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757.
