The purpose of this article is to explore the most effective print advertising strategy in terms of message strategy and execution framework for young men in India. Young men (n = 400) watched 20 advertisements in which message strategy and execution framework were manipulated in a 2 × 10 completely crossed factorial design and were asked to rate their attention, comprehension, retention, attitudes and purchase motivation about these advertisements. Results suggest that cognitive message strategy along with comparison as execution framework is the most effective for young men. Findings are then discussed.
Belch, G.E. and M.A. Belch.1990. Introduction to Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. Chicago, IL: Richard D. Irwin .
4.
Benton, S.L. , J.A. Glover and R.H. Bruning . 1983. Levels of processing: Effect of number of decisions on prose recall . Journal of Education Psychology, 3: 382–90 .
5.
Bettman, J.R.1979. ‘An information processing theory of consumer choice’, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
6.
Cramer, E.M. and R.D. Bock . 1966. Multivariate analysis . Review of Educational Research, 36: 604–17 .
7.
Dewey, J.1910. How We Think. Boston: DC Heath & CO.
8.
DuPlessis, E.2001. Reclame en ons brein [advertising and our brains]. Alphenn aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Samson .
9.
Escalas, J.E.1998. Advertising narratives: What are they and how do they work?Representing Consumers: Voices, Views, and Visions (pp. 267–89 ). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
10.
Harris, R.J.1983. Information-Processing Research in Advertising. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum .
11.
Lapidus, R.S.1991. Visual Information Processing of Print Advertising: Cognitive and Experiential Response to Artistic Style. ETD collection for University of Nebraska: Lincoln . Paper AAI9200144.
12.
Mick, David Glen . 1992. ‘ Levels of subjective comprehension in advertising processing and their relations to ad perceptions, attitudes, and memory ’, Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4): 411–24 .
