A poorly designed tax structure results in several problems like high compliance costs, tax evasion, and so on. In this context, taxpayer‘s attitude can play a vital role in tax policy-making of any country. The present article is an attempt to study the attitude of Indian taxpayers as regards tax policy design and implementation. The study is based on a sample of 414 respondents taken from the major cities of Punjab, Delhi and Chandigarh. Factor analysis has been applied for identifying the factors influencing the attitude of taxpayers. Advocated procedures are applied for assessing the reliability and validity of the scale. The findings reveal that, in India, the taxpayers have shown more concern for the tax base broadening measures like effective linkage between social welfare and the utilization of tax revenue, Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS)and so on. Further, the complexity of tax procedure has emerged as an important issue. Technology has also been identified as a major factor as it can provide e-filing facility. These results reflect the support of taxpayers for a simple and transparent tax structure.
Auerbach, Alan J.2004. ‘Taxpayer Behavior and Government Policy’. NBER Reporter: Research Summary. Winter. Available at http://www.nber.org (Accessed on 11 February 2005).
2.
Barki, Henri and Jon Hartwick . 1994. ‘ Measuring User Participation, User Involvement and User Attitude ’, MIS Quarterly, 18(1): 59–82 .
3.
Bhalla, S.S.2004. ‘Tax Rates, Tax Compliance and Tax Revenues: India 1988–2004’, Oxus Research and Investments, New Delhi . Available at www.oxusresearch. com (Accessed on 23 February 2005).
4.
Bijawat, Mahesh C.1973. ‘ The Individual Income-Tax Return-A Comparative Study of the Provisions in India, Pakistan, United States, Canada, Sweden and Japan ’, Taxation, 35(July–December): 111–22 .
5.
Braithwaite, V. , M. Reinhart , M. Mearns and R.G. Rachelle . 2001. ‘Preliminary Findings from the Community Hopes, Fears and Actions Survey’. Working Paper No. 3. Centre for Tax System Integrity. Research School of Social Sciences. Australian National University. Canberra .
6.
Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske . 1959. ‘ Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait Multimethod Matrix ’, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2): 81–105 .
7.
Chattopadhyay, Saumen and A. Das-Gupta . 2002. The Compliance Cost of the Personal Income Tax and its Determinants. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. New Delhi .
8.
Devarajan, R.2003. ‘ Income-Tax Department Cares ’, The Chartered Accountant, 52(5): 527–29 .
9.
Economic Editor‘s Conference. 2006. ‘ I am Particularly Happy to Note that the Attitude of Assessees towards Taxes Seems to have Undergone a Remarkable Change ’. Available at http://www.indiantaxsolutions.com/main.php?t=28011985&d=1162927311 (Accessed on 24 November 2006).
10.
Green, P.E. , D.S. Tull , and Gerald Albaum . 1992. Research for Marketing Decisions. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall .
11.
Hair, J.F. , R.E. Anderson , R.L. Tatham and C.B. William . 2005. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Delhi: Pearson Education .
12.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2003. ‘The NPR/Kaiser Family Foundation/ Kennedy School National Survey of Americans Views on Taxes’. John F. Kennedy School of Government. Harvard University , Available at www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/3340-index.cfm (Accessed on 24 October 2005).
13.
Kantawala, A.S.1998. ‘ Individual Taxation and Inflation ’, The Indian Economic Journal, 45(1): 93–105 .
14.
Kaplan, R.M. and D.P. Sacuzzo . 1993. Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole .
15.
Kinsey, Karyl A. , Harold G. Grasmick and K.W. Smith . 1991. ‘ Framing Justice: Taxpayer Evaluations of Personal Tax Burdens ’, Law and Society Review, 25(4): 845–74 .
16.
Lambert, S. , G. Beer and J. Smith . 1998. ‘Taxing the Individual or the Couple: A Distribution Analysis’, Discussion Paper No. 15, National Center for Social and Economic Modeling, University of Canberra, Canberra .
17.
Lederman, L.2003. ‘ The Interplay between Norms and Enforcement in Tax Compliance ’, Ohio State Law Journal, 64(6): 53–1514 .
18.
Majii, M.M. and D. Rakshit . 2002. ‘ Basic Exemption of Taxable Income and Consumer Price Index (CPI): An Evaluation at Constant Rupee ’, The Management Accountant, 37(11): 829–32 .
Maloney, Maureen A.1988. ‘ An Analysis of Direct Taxes in India: A Feminist Perspective ’, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 30(4): 397–414 .
21.
Pandey, T.N.2000. ‘ Policy Regarding Tax Relief Provisions in India and United States Tax Law ’, Tax and Corporate Referencer, 20(2): 29–33 .
22.
Pandey, T.N.2003. ‘Develop a Tax Culture for Better Compliance’. Available at http://www.rediff.com/money/2003/oct/27spec.htm (Accessed on 14 June 2008).
23.
Pillarisetti, J. Ram . 1995. ‘ Direct Tax Reform in Privatizing Economies—A Comparative Study of India and Latin American Countries ’, International Journal of Social Economics, 22(8): 22–33 .
24.
Sahota, G.S.1991. ‘Taxpayer Responsiveness to Changes in Income Tax Rates in India’, Occasional Paper No. 10, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi .
25.
Sen, Raj Kumar . 1978. ‘ The Theory and Practice of Our Income Tax ’, The Indian Economic Journal, 26(I): 29–39 .
26.
Singh, Jaspal . 2001. ‘ Taxation of Agricultural Income ’, Journal of Management Studies, I: 101–08 .
27.
Snow, John W.2003. Return-Free Tax Systems: Tax Simplification is a Prerequisite, Washington DC, US: Department of the Treasury .
28.
Song, Young-dahl Y. and Tinsley E.1978. ‘ Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey ’, Public Administration Review, 38(5): 442–52 .
29.
Venkatesh, MR.2007. ‘ The Tragedy and Tyranny of India‘s Tax Administration ’. Available at www.rediff.com/money/2007/may/31tax1.htm (Accessed on 25 May 2008).
