Does Direct Investment in Complementary Businesses make Business Sense to Foreign Companies in an Emerging Economy? Case of British American Tobacco in India,1906–2004
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2007
Does Direct Investment in Complementary Businesses make Business Sense to Foreign Companies in an Emerging Economy? Case of British American Tobacco in India,1906–2004
The objective of this article is to find out if direct investment in complementary businesses is important for success of a foreign company in the context of an emerging economy like India. The article analyses the case of British American Tobacco (BAT) with regard to its nature, timing and scope of investment in India from 1906 to 2004 to explain the determinants of its success in India. From a sample of 51 foreign companies that have been operating in India prior to 1991 and that showed consistency in their financial performance, the case of BAT was chosen for the study. While the study shows the importance of holistic investment approach for success of a foreign firm in an emerging economy, it argues that investments in complementary businesses contributes significantly to the success of direct investment in the context of an emerging economy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Basu, Champaka . 1988. Challenge and Change, The ITC Story: 1910–1985. Calcutta: Orient Longman .
2.
Carlsson, J. , A. Nordegren and F. Sjoholm . 2005. ‘ International Experience and the Performance of Scandinavian Firms in China ’, International Business Review, 15: 21–40 .
3.
Chen, H.1999. ‘ International Performance of Multinationals: A Hybrid Model ’, Journal of World Business, 34 (2): 157–70 .
4.
Encarnation, Dennis . 1989. Dislodging Multinationals, India's Strategy in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press .
5.
Ghemawat, P.2001. ‘ Tool Kit: Distance Still Matters—The Hard Reality of Global Expansion ’, Harvard Business Review, September 2001: 137–47 .
6.
Gujarati, Damodar N.2003. Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition, pp. 341–70, New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill .
7.
Haksar, Ajit N.1993. Bite the Bullet, Thirty-four years with ITC. New Delhi: Viking, Penguin Books .
8.
Indian Investment Center. ‘Foreign Direct Investment Approved by the Government of India’, 1990–2000, Government of India, New Delhi .
Johanson, J. & Associates . 1994. Internationalization, Relationships and Networks, Stockholm, Uppsala University: Norstedts Tryckeri AB .
11.
Johanson, J. and J.E. Vahlne . 1977. ‘ The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments ’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 22–32 .
12.
Johri, Lalit M.1983. Business Strategies of Multinational Corporations in India: Case Study of Drug and Pharmaceutical Industry. New Delhi: Vision Books Pvt. Limited .
13.
Jovarcik, B.S.2004. ‘ Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms—In Search of Spillover Through Backward Linkages ’, American Economic Review, 94(3): 605–27 .
14.
Kidron, Michael . 1965. Foreign Investments in India. London: Oxford University Press .
15.
Kobe University. Data Base Select Report. Kobe University, Japan: Research Institute of Economic and Business
16.
Kumar Krishna . 2003. ‘ Has India Inc Failed in Playing the Leadership Role? ’ Vikalpa, 28(3): July–September 2003, pp. 1–14 .
17.
Kumar, Nagesh . 1990. Multinational Enterprises in India-Industrial Distribution, Characteristics, and Performance. New York: Routledge .
18.
Kumar, Sanjeev . 1996. Foreign Direct Investment in India. Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation .
19.
Kurian, Mathew K.1966. Impact of Foreign Capital on Indian Economy. New Delhi: People's Publishing House Private Limited .
Luo, Y.1998. ‘ Timing of Investment and International Expansion Performance in China ’, Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (2): 391–408 .
22.
Mason, R.L. , R.F. Gunst and J.T. Webster . 1975. ‘ Regression Analysis and Problems of Multicollinearity ’, Communications in Statistics, 4(9): 277–92 .
23.
Montogomery, Douglas and Elizabeth Peck . 1982. Introduction to Linear Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons .
24.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R.2002. ‘ Disequilibrium of FDI in Extraction vs Conservation of Natural Resources, International Conference on New Environmental Technologies ’, BORDA (Germany) & NISWASS (India), Bhubaneswar, Nov 28–30.
25.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R.2002. ‘Patterns of Foreign Direct Investment in India, 1900s–2000’, Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University, Japan .
26.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R.2003. ‘ Impact of Trade and Investment Policies of GATT/WTO on India, 1955–2000 ’, XXVII Conference of Indian Social Science Congress, IIT Kharagpur, Dec. 3–7.
27.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R.2004. ‘ Globalization Process in India: A Clash of Development Objectives of Host with Growth Objectives of Foreign Companies ’, 2nd International Conference of Association of International Business-India Chapter, Loyola College, Chennai, Jan. 14–16.
28.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R.2005. ‘ FDI Model in Emerging Economies: Case of Suzuki Motors in India ’, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6(1).
29.
Nayak, Amar K. J. R. 2006. ‘Determinants of Successful Direct Investment Strategy by Foreign Firms in India: Case Based Study’, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur.
30.
Nayak, Amar K.J. R., K. Chakravarti and P. Rajib . 2005. ‘ Globalization Process in India: A Historical Perspective since Independence, 1947 ’, South Asian Journal of Management, 12(1).
31.
Rivoli, P. and E. Salorio . 1996. ‘ Foreign Direct Investment and Investment under Uncertainty ’, Journal of International Business Studies, 2nd Quarter, 1996: 335–57 .
32.
Sharma, Kishore . 2000. ‘ Export Growth in India, Has FDI Played a Role? ’, Discussion Paper, Yale University, Economic Growth Center, http://www.econ.yale.edu/egcenter/ (accessed 11/12/2003).
33.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.2002. Globalization and its Discontents. London: Allen Lane: The Penguin Press .
34.
Tomlinson, B.R.1989. ‘British Business in India, 1860–1970’, in Davenport-Hines, R.P.T. and Geoffrey Jones (eds), British Business in Asia since 1860, New York: Cambridge University Press .
35.
Venkataramani, Raja . 1990. Japan enters Indian Industry: The Maruti-Suzuki Joint Venture. New Delhi: Radiant Publication .
