Personality and Justice—Perceptions of the Software Professionals of India

Abstract

The growth of the software industry in India requires that issues related to knowledge workers be understood and dealt with in greater detail if software professionals are to be managed effectively. Issues of appraisal and salary administration are paramount in the context of software professionals in India, and the professionals’ perceptions of fairness/unfairness of these systems are important for the design of socially valid HR systems. This study explores some of these issues. It examines the extent to which personality predicts employees’ perceptions of justice at the workplace. We defined workplace justice in terms of procedural and distributive justice and personality was conceptualized in terms of the locus of control, emotional quotient and justice orientation constructs. A survey of 310 employees was conducted across various software organizations in India. Locus of control and emotional quotient were found to be strong predictors of procedural justice, and equity orientation and emotional quotient were the best predictors for interactional justice. Results and their implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brockner, J. 1988. ‘The Effects of Work Layoffs on Survivors Research, Theory and Practice’, in B.M. Staw and Q. Cummings (eds), Research in Organization Behaviour, vol. 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .

Cherniss, C. and M. Adler . 2000. Promoting Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. Alexandra, Virginia: ASTD .

Drucker, P. 2001. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Harper Business .

Dulebohn, J.H. and G.R. Ferris . 1999. ‘The Role of Influence Tactics in Perceptions of Performance Evaluations’ Fairness’ , Academy of Management Journal, 42(3): 288-303 .

Dunham, R.B. 1984. Organization Behaviour—People Process Management. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Folger, R. and R. Cropanzano . 1998. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .

Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam .

Greenberg, J. 1986. ‘Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluation’ , Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 340-342 .

Greenberg, J. 1990. ‘Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow’ , Journal of Management, 16: 399-432 .

10.

Hammer T.H. and Y. Vardi . 1981. ‘Locus of Control and Career Self Management among Non Supervisory Employees in Industrial Settings’ , Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 18: 13-29 .

11.

Harvey, J. , H. Barnes , D.L. Sperry and B. Harris . 1975. ‘Perceived Choice as a Function of Internal-External Locus of Control’ , Journal of Personality, 42: 437-452 .

12.

Julian, J.W. and S.B. Katz . 1968. ‘Internal versus External Locus of Control and the Value of Reinforcement’ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8: 89-94 .

13.

Landy, F.J. , J.L. Barnes and K.R. Murphy . 1978. ‘Correlates of Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performing Evaluation’ , Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 751-754 .

14.

Moorman, R.H. 1991. ‘Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 845-855 .

15.

Nowicki, Jr, S. and M.P. Duke . 1991. ‘Adult Nowicki Strickland Internal External Control Scale [ANSIE]’, in J.P. Robinson , P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (eds), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press .

16.

Price, James L. and Charles W. Mueller . 1986. Handbook of Organisational Measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pittman .

17.

Ravi, D. 2001. Emotional Intelligence—A Sine Qua Non of Leadership’, JIMS , 8M, October-December 2001.

18.

Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized Expectancies for External versus Internal Control of Reinforcement’ , Psychological Monographs, 80 (whole no: 609)

19.

Salovey P. and J.D. Mayer . 1990. ‘Emotional Intellegence’ , Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3): 185-211 .

20.

Shoda. Y. and W. Mischel . 1993. ‘Cognitive Social Approach to Dispositional Inferences. What if the perceiver uses cognitive social theories?’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19: 574-586 .

21.

Skarlicki, D.P. and R. Folger . 1997. ‘Retaliation in the Workplace: The Roles of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice’ . Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434-443 .

22.

Sweeney P.D. and D.B. McFarlin . 1993. ‘Workers’ Evaluations of the “Ends” and the Means: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice’ , Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 5: 23-40 .

23.

Velasquez, M.G. 1992. Business Ethics. New York: Prentice Hall Inc.