Small Indian software firms employ widely varying profiles of manpower. Manpower is the most important resource of such firms. Variatioiis in resources cannot be suitably defined by a resource perspective on strategy. This paper argues that software firms follow emergent strategies. Resource strategy and business strategy of a firm in the software industry are influenced by a process perspective. Firms employ quality of manpower to leverage emergent market disequilibria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amit, R. and P. Shoemaker.1993. 'Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent', Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33-46.
2.
Andrews, K.R.1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
3.
Banerjee, A.V. and E. Duflo.2000. 'Reputation Effects and the Limits of Contracting: A study of the Indian Software Industry', forthcoming in Quarterly Journal of Economics. Available at http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/eduflo/files/papers/sofpap102.1.pdf.
4.
Banerjee, P. forthcoming. 'Strategic Management of Information in Indian Information Sector Firms through Job-switches', International Journal of Information Management.
5.
Banerjee, P.2003a. 'Resources Strategy and Signals to Resources Market in Indian Software', Global Business Review, 4(1): 115-29.
6.
—. 2003b. 'Resource Dependence and Core Competence: Insights from Indian Software Firms', Technovation, 23: 251-63.
7.
—. 2003c. 'Coordination, Strategy and Capability in Indian Software ', in F.J. Richter and P. Banerjee (eds), The Knowledge Economy in India. London: Palgrave- Macmillan.
8.
Banerjee, P. and K.K. Bharadwaj.2002. 'Constructivist Management of Knowledge, Communication and Enterprise innovation: Lessons from Indian Experience', AI & Society, 16: 49-72.
9.
Banerjee, P. and F.J. Richter.2001. 'Social Management: Situating Imagination, Concept, Cooperation and Intangible Assets in the Knowledge Business', in P. Banerjee and F.J. Richter (eds), Intangibles in Competition and Cooperation: Euro-Asian Perspectives. London: Palgrave.
10.
Barney, J.B.1986. 'Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy', Management Science, 32(10): 1231-41.
11.
—. 1991. 'Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage', Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
12.
Boettke, P. and D. Prychitko (eds). 1998. Market Process Theories, in two volumes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13.
Bromiley, P. and L. Fleming.2002. 'The Resource Based View of Strategy: An Evolutionist's Critique', in M. Augier and J.G. March (eds), The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organizations: Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
14.
Cason. M.1982. The Entrepreneur. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15.
Foss, J.J., C. Knudsen and C.A. Montgomery .1995. 'An Exploration of Common Ground: Integrating Evolutionary and Strategic Theories of the Firm', in C.A. Montgomery (ed.), Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
16.
Foss, N. and V. Mahnke.2000. 'Strategy Research and the Market Process Perspective', in J. Krafft (ed.), The Process of Competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
17.
Kirzner, I.1997. 'Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach', Journal of Economic Literature , 35: 60-85.
18.
Lippman, S. and R. Rumelt.1982. 'Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences under Competition', Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 418-38.
19.
Loasby, B.1991. Equilibrium and Evolution. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
20.
Montgomery, C.1995. 'Of Diamonds and Rust: A New Look at Resources', in C. Montgomery (ed.), Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: . Towards a Synthesis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
21.
Mosakowski, E.1998. 'Managerial Prescriptions under the Resource-based View of Strategy: The Example of Motivational Techniques', Strategic Management Journal, 19(12): 1169-83.
Peteraf, M.A.1993. 'The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View', Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 179-91.
24.
Pfeffer, J.2001. 'Fighting the War for Talent is Hazardous to your Organization's Health', Research Paper No. 1687, Graduate School of Business, Stanford: Stanford University.
25.
Porter, M.1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
26.
Schmalensee, R. and T. Willig (eds). 1989. Handbook of Industrial Organization . Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27.
Sengupta, J.K.2002. 'Facing Hypercompetition in World Software Markets: Global Strategies for India', in F.J. Richter and P. Banerjee (eds), The Knowledge Economy in India. London: Palgrave / Macmillan.
28.
Shapiro, C.1989. 'The Theory of Strategy', Rand Journal of Economics, 20: 125-37.
29.
Teece, D.J.1988. 'Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm', in G. Dosi, C. Freman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publisher.
30.
Teece, D.J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen.1997. 'Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management', Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-33.
31.
Wernerfelt, B.1984. 'A Resource-based View of the Firm', Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-80.
