Priority Setting for Collaborative Health Systems Research in India: A Method and the Way Forward

Abstract

A comprehensive and collaborative knowledge translation and decision-making approach can help reduce the longstanding barriers to using research in policy and practice. Regular interaction between researchers and decision-makers increases the likelihood of using research knowledge. This interaction continuing over the entire research cycle is critical for developing research directions and potential use of the research outputs that benefit the health system.

The India Health Systems Collaborative and ACCESS Health International have conducted a rigorous exercise to arrive at the priority research topics. A consensus-based method customised to the existing need was created, adapting from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method for research priority setting. In this method, conducting literature reviews, key informant interviews and survey-based stakeholder consultations are critical steps for identifying policy-relevant research topics that demand utmost attention in the Indian setting.

This article documents the processes followed to develop a preliminary list of core research priorities requiring urgent attention to facilitate policy development. Additionally, the article is about the essential and immediate next steps and the critical actions taken to undertake collaborative research on the identified research topics. The special issue of the Journal for Health Management dedicated to strengthening the Indian health system sets the foundation for promoting collaborative research, its dissemination for broader use by researchers and ensuing policy dialogues.

Keywords

Priority setting health policy and systems research health systems strengthening policy relevance evidence-based policymaking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. (2019). Setting research priorities: A guide. Evidence and Evaluation Guidance Series, Population and Public Health Division . NSW Ministry of Health.

Kaplan

(2013). Background paper 3 approaches to priority setting. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World 2013 Update . World Health Organization.

Lavis

J. N.,

Lomas

J.,

Hamid

, & Sewankambo

N. K.

(2006). Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bulletin of the World health Organization , 84, 620–628.

Nuyens

(2007). Setting priorities for health research: Lessons from low-and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization , 85, 319–321.

Ranson

M. K.

, & Bennett

S. C.

(2009). Priority setting and health policy and systems research. Health Research Policy and Systems , 7(1), 1–7.

Schmets

G.,

Rajan.

, & Kadandale

(Eds.) (2016). Strategizing national health in the 21st century: A handbook . World Health Organization.

Sibbald

S. L.,

Singer

P. A.,

Upshur

, & Martin

D. K.

(2009). Priority setting: What constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Services Research , 9(1), 1–12.

Smith

N.,

Mitton

C.,

Peacock

S.,

Cornelissen

, & MacLeod

(2009). Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: A collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Services Research , 9(1), 1–9.

Viergever

R. F.,

Olifson

S.,

Ghaffar

, & Terry

R. F.

(2010). A checklist for health research priority setting: Nine common themes of good practice. Health Research Policy and Systems , 8(1), 1–9.