Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-3
Are the Poor Catching Up with the Rich in Utilising Reproductive,Maternal,New Born and Child Health Services: An Application of Delivery Channels Framework in Indian Context
The article is aimed to assess trends in wealth-related inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) interventions using delivery channels framework in Indian context, at national level as well as at state level—Tamil Nadu (TN) and Chhattisgarh (CG)—a better off and poorer state, respectively. We used National Family Health Survey—3rd (2005–2006) and 4th (2015–2016) to study the trends and differentials of inequalities in the RMNCH coverage. We have used two summary indices—absolute inequalities using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative inequalities using the concentration index (CIX). Culturally driven interventions had pro-poor inequalities in TN, CG and in India, but the coverage has improved significantly for the women from wealthier households recently. Environmental interventions were highly inequal in distribution, particularly for the ‘use of clean fuels’. Inequalities in the coverage of health facilities-based interventions has reduced in TN, CG and overall India, but more so in TN. The inequalities in coverage of community-based interventions have reduced over the period of ten years in TN, CG as well as at national level. Adopting RMNCH delivery channel framework could be useful for assessing and monitoring the progress of public health programmes. Policy makers can gain insights from the success of coverage of various interventions and determine specific implementation strategies to reduce inequalities in the coverage and its effectiveness.
AcharyaS. S. (2018). Health equity in India: An examination through the lens of social exclusion. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 4(1), 104–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481118774489
2.
AggarwalA., AroraS., & PatwariA. K. (1998). Breastfeeding among urban women of low-socioeconomic status: Factors influencing introduction of supplemental feeds before four months of age. Indian Pediatrics, 35(3), 269–273.
3.
AliB., DebnathP., & AnwarT. (2021). Inequalities in utilisation of maternal health services in urban India: Evidences from National Family Health Survey-4. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 10(October 2020), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.11.005
4.
AwasthiA., PandeyC. M., ChauhanR. K., & SinghU. (2016). Disparity in maternal, newborn and child health services in high focus states in India: A district-level cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open, 6(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009885
5.
BarrosA. J. D., & VictoraC. G. (2013). Measuring coverage in MNCH: Determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLOS Medicine, 10(5), e1001390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390
6.
BarrosA. J. D., RonsmansC., AxelsonH., LoaizaE., BertoldiA. D., FranaG. V., BryceJ., BoermaJ. T., & VictoraC. G. (2012). Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: A retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. The Lancet, 379(9822), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60113-5
7.
BaruR. V, AcharyaA., AcharyaS., Shiva KumarA., & NagarajK. (2010). Inequities in access to health services in India. Economic & Political Weekly, xlv(38), 49–58. http://www.mendeley.com/research/inequities-access-health-services-india/
8.
BryceJ., El ArifeenS., PariyoG., LanataC. F., GwatkinD., HabichtJ. P.The Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Study Group. (2003). Reducing child mortality: Can public health deliver? The Lancet, 362(9378), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13870-6
9.
ChakrabartiS., RaghunathanK., AldermanH., MenonP., & NguyenP. (2019). India’s integrated child development services programme; equity and extent of coverage in 2006 and 2016. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.221135
10.
Countdown 2008 Equity Analysis Group. (2008). Mind the gap: Equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries. The Lancet, 371, 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60560-7
11.
DandonaR., KumarG. A., HenryN. J., JoshuaV., RamjiS., GuptaS. S., AgrawalD., KumarR., LodhaR., MathaiM., KassebaumN. J., PandeyA., WangH., SinhaA., HemalathaR., AbdulkaderR. S., AgarwalV., AlbertS., BiswasA., & DandonaL. (2020). Subnational mapping of under-5 and neonatal mortality trends in India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–17. The Lancet, 395(10237), 1640–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30471-2
12.
DeonF., & PritchettL. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.
13.
GriffithsP., StephensonR. (2001). Understanding users’ perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 33(3), 339–359.
14.
HarperS., & LynchJ. (2005). Methods for measuring cancer disparities: Using data relevant to Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives(NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, No. 6). National Cancer Institute. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/publications/disparities/
15.
HellwigF., CollC. V. N., EwerlingF., & BarrosA. J. D. (2019). Time trends in demand for family planning satisfied: Analysis of 73 countries using national health surveys over a 24-year period. Journal of Global Health, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020423
16.
International Center for Equity in Health. (n.d.). International Center for Equity in Health: Indicators & stratifiers. Universidade Federal de Pelotas. https://www.equidade.org/indicators
17.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06. IIPS.
18.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF. (2017). National family health survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16. IIPS.
19.
KumarC., SinghP. K., & RaiR. K. (2012). Under-five mortality in high focus states in india: A district level geospatial analysis. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037515
20.
KumarC., SinghP. K., & RaiR. K. (2013). Coverage gap in maternal and child health services in India: Assessing trends and regional deprivation during 1992-2006. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 35(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds108
21.
LeventhalD. G. P., Crochemore-SilvaI., VidalettiL. P., Armenta-PaulinoN., BarrosA. J. D., & VictoraC. G. (2021). Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: Analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Global Health, 9(8), e1101–e1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7
22.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2017). 11th Common Review Mission (Vol. 148). Government of India.
23.
MoserK., FrostC., & LeonD. A. (2007). Comparing health inequalities across time and place—Rate ratios and rate differences lead to different conclusions: Analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries 1991–2001. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(6), 1285–1291. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym176
24.
NayakS. (2019). The demographic and development divide in India: A district level analysis. In S. K. Mohanty, U. S. Mishra, R. K. Chauhan (Eds.), The demographic and development divide in India: A district level analysis (pp. 375–416). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2020.1787102
25.
OgboF. A., DhamiM. V., AwosemoA. O., OlusanyaB. O., OlusanyaJ., OsuagwuU. L., GhimireP. R., PageA., & AghoK. E. (2019a). Regional prevalence and determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in India. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0220-2
26.
OgboF. A., DhamiM. V., UdeE. M., SenanayakeP., OsuagwuU. L., AwosemoA. O., OgelekaP., AkombiB. J., EzehO. K., & AghoK. E. (2019b). Enablers and barriers to the utilization of antenatal care services in India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173152
27.
ParmarV. R., SalariaM., PoddarB., SinghK., & GhotraH., & Sucharu. (2000). Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding breast feeding at Chandigarh. Indian Journal of Public Health, 44(4), 131–133.
28.
PathakP. K., SinghA., & SubramanianS. V. (2010). Economic inequalities in maternal health care: Prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992–2006. PLoS ONE, 5(10), 1992–2006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013593
29.
PradhanJ., & ArokiasamyP. (2010). Socio-economic inequalities in child survival in India: A decomposition analysis. Health Policy, 98(2–3), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.010
30.
RadhakrishnanS., & BalamurugaS. S. (2012). Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding practices among rural women in Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Health & Allied Sciences, 1(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-344x.101667
31.
RaiR. K. (2014). Tracking women and children in a continuum of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child healthcare (RMNCH) in India. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 4(3), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2013.12.006
32.
RaiR. K., KumarC., & SinghP. K. (2012). District level coverage gap in maternal, newborn and child health care services in India. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 2(4), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2012.12.004
33.
RaniM., BonuS., & HarveyS. (2008). Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm052
34.
SinghP. K., RaiR. K., & KumarC. (2013). Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health care coverage in India. Global Health Action, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.22217
35.
SubramanyamM. A., KawachiI., BerkmanL. F., & SubramanianS. V. (2010). Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood undernutrition in India: Analyzing trends between 1992 and 2005. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11392. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011392
36.
VellakkalS., GuptaA., KhanZ., StucklerD., ReevesA., EbrahimS., BowlingA., & DoyleP. (2017). Has India’s national rural health mission reduced inequities in maternal health services? A pre-post repeated cross-sectional study. Health Policy and Planning, 32(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw100
37.
VictoraC. G., WagstaffA., SchellenbergJ. A., GwatkinD., ClaesonM., & HabichtJ. P. (2003). Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: More of the same is not enough. Lancet, 362(9379), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13917-7
38.
VictoraC. G., BarrosA. J. D., AxelsonH., BhuttaZ. A., ChopraM., FrançaG. V. A., KerberK., KirkwoodB. R., NewbyH., RonsmansC., & BoermaJ. T. (2012). How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: An analysis of national surveys. The Lancet, 380(9848), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61427-5
39.
VictoraC., RequejoJ., BoermaT., AmouzouA., BhuttaZ. A., BlackR. E., & ChopraM. (2016). Countdown to 2030 for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health and nutrition. The Lancet Global Health, 4(11), e775–e776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30204-2
40.
World Health Organization. (2015). State of inequality: Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. WHO.
41.
World Health Organization. (2012). GLAAS 2012 report. UN-water global analysis and assessment of sanitatioin and drinking-water (p. 101). http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/pdf/glaas_report_2012_eng.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
