This article describes the history, features and functions of the Islamic law courts in the Ottoman Empire before the Tanzimat era. After briefly surveying of the roots of this institution in pre-Ottoman settings, the article focusses on how Ottoman administrators and juridical experts built on this legacy. Later, the article discusses the modern scholarly literature on the court in a way to reflect on its prevalent tendencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgmonIris2004. ‘Women’s History and Ottoman Sharia Court Records: Shifting Perspectives in Social History.’ Hawwa, vol. 2: 171–209.
AykanYavuz. 2016. Rendre la justice à Amid: Procédures, acteurs et doctrines dans le contexte ottoman du XVIIIe siècle. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
5.
BlanquieChristophe. 2001. Justice et finance sous l’Ancien Régime: La vénalité présidiale. Paris: L’Harmattan.
6.
BrunschvigRobert. 1976. ‘Le système de la preuve en droit musulman.’ Études d’Islamologie, vol. 2: 201–19.
7.
BurnsKathryn. 2010. Into the Archive: Writing and Power in Colonial Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
CoşgelMetin M.ErgeneBoğaç. 2014. ‘“Law and Economics” Literature and Ottoman Legal Studies.’ Islamic Law and Society, vol. 21 (4): 114–44.
9.
CoşgelMetin M.ErgeneBoğaç. 2016. The Economics of Ottoman Justice: Settlement and Trial in the Sharia Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
El-NahalGalal. 1979. The Judicial Administration of Ottoman Egypt in the Seventeenth Century. Minneapolis, MN; Chicago, IL: Bibliotheca Islamica.
11.
ErgeneBoğaç A.2003. Local Court Provincial Society and Justice in the Ottoman Empire: Local Practice and Dispute Resolution in Çankırı and Kastamonu. Leiden: Brill.
12.
———. 2010. ‘Why did Ümmü Gülsüm Go to Court? Ottoman Legal Practice Between History and Anthropology.’ Islamic Law and Society, vol. 17 (2): 215–44.
13.
GerberHaim. 1994. State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
GerberHaim. 2018. Oppression and Salvation: Annotated Legal Documents from the Ottoman Book of Complaints of 1675. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.
15.
GinioEyal. 1998. ‘The Administration of Criminal Justice in Ottoman Selânik (Salonica) During the Eighteenth Century.’ Turcica, vol. 30: 191–92.
16.
GronkeMonika. 1982. Arabische und persische Privaturkunden des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts aus Ardabil (Aserbaidschan). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.
17.
HallaqWael. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HannaNelly. 1995. ‘The Administration of Courts in Ottoman Cairo’, in The State and Its Servants, Administration in Egypt from Ottoman Times to the Present, edited by HannaNelly. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press: 44–59.
19.
İbn-i Abidin. n.d. Reddü’l Muhtar ale’d-Dürrü’l Muhtar. Translated into Turkish by TaşkesenoğluMazhar. Istanbul: Şamil Yayınları.
20.
İpşirliMehmet, ed. 2009. Tarih-i Naima, 4 vols. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
21.
JenningsRonald. 1978. ‘Kadi, Court, and Legal Procedure in 17th C. Ottoman Kayseri: The Kadi and the Legal System.’ Studia Islamica, vol. 48: 133–72.
22.
JohansenBaber. 1997. ‘Formes de langage et fonctions publiques: stéréotypes, témoins et offices dans la preuve par l’écrit en droit musulman.’ Arabica, vol. 44 (3): 333–76.
23.
KhouryRaif G.1993. Chrestomathie de papyrologie arabe: documents relatifs à la vie privée, sociale et administrative dans les premiers siècles islamiques. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
24.
KlermanDaniel M.2007. ‘Jurisdictional Competition and the Evolution of the Common Law’, University of Chicago Law Review, 1179; University of Southern California CLEO Research Paper No. C07-4; University of Southern California Law Legal Studies Paper No. 07-2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=968701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.968701 (accessed on 26 May 2019).
25.
KuruLevent. 2016. Kazasker Ruznamçelerine Göre 18. Yűzyılın İlk Yarısında Rumeli’de Kadılık Müessesesi. Unpublished PhD Dissertation: Marmara University, Istanbul.
26.
KurzMarlene. 2003. Das Sicill aus Skopje. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
27.
‘Maḥkama.’1991. in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited by BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC. E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW. P., 2nd edition, vol. 6. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
28.
MarcusAbraham. 1989. The Middle East on the Eve of Modernity: Aleppo in the Eighteenth Century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
29.
MastersBruce. 1992. ‘Ottoman Policies Toward Syria in the 17th and 18th Centuries’, in The Syrian Land in the 18th and 19th Century, edited by PhilippThomas. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag: 11–26.
30.
MüllerChristian. 2000. ‘Judging with God’s Law on Earth: Judicial Powers of the Qāḍī al-jamā a of Cordoba in the Fifth/Eleventh Century.’ Islamic Law and Society, vol. 7 (2): 159–86.
31.
MüllerChristian. 2008. ‘A Legal Instrument in the Service of People and Institutions: Endowments in Mamluk Jerusalem as Mirrored in the Ḥaram Documents.’ Mamlūk Studies Review, vol. 12 (1): 173–91.
32.
‘Mazālim.’1991. in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited by BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC. E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW. P., 2nd edition, vol. 6. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
33.
NielsenJørgen. 1985. Secular Justice in an Islamic State: Maẓālim Under the Baḥrī Mamlūks, 662/1264–789/1387. Leiden: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.
34.
NussdorferLaurie. 2009. Brokers of Public Trust: Notaries in Early Modern Rome. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
ÖzmucurSüleymanPamukŞevket. 2002. ‘Real Wages and Standards of Living in the Ottoman Empire 1489–1941.’ The Journal of Economic History, vol. 62 (2): 293–321.
36.
PowersDavid S.2007. ‘Judges’, in Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia, edited by MeriJoseph W., vol. 2. New York, NY: Routledge: 423–426.
‘Qāḍī.’1995. in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited by BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC. E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW. P., 2nd edition, vol. 9. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
39.
‘Qāḍī ‘Askar.’1995. in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited by BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC. E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW. P., 2nd edition, vol. 9. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
40.
ReppRichard. 1986. The Müfti of Istanbul: A Study in the Development of the Ottoman Learned Hierarchy. Oxford: Oxford Oriental Institute Monographs.
41.
RosenLawrence. 1990. The Anthropology of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RosenLawrence. 2000. The Justice of Islam: Comparative Perspectives on Islamic Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
SchachtJoseph. 1934. ‘Maḥkama’, in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited HoutsmaM. Th.ArnoldT. W.BassetR.HartmannR., 1st edition, vol. 3. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
44.
SchachtJoseph. 1959. The Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
SchachtJoseph. 1966. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
‘Sidjill, In Ottoman Administrative Usage.’1995. in Encyclopedia of Islam, edited by BearmanP.BianquisTh.BosworthC. E.van DonzelE.HeinrichsW. P., 2nd edition, Volume 9. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
47.
SijpesteijnPetra M.SundelinLennartTovarSofía TorallasZomenAmalia, eds. 2006. From al-Andalus to Khurasan: Documents from the Medieval Muslim World. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
48.
SoleilSylvain. 1997. Le siège royal de la sénéchaussée et du présidial d’Angers. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
49.
TakEkrem. 2009. Diplomatik Bilimi Bakımından XVI–XVII. Yüzyıl Kadı Sicilleri ve Bu Sicillerin İhtiva Ettiği Belge Türlerinin Form Özellikleri ve Tanımlanması. Unpublished PhD Dissertation: Marmara University, Istanbul.
Uzunçarşılıİsmail Hakkı. 2014. Osmanlı Devletiʼnin İlmiye Teşkilâtı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
56.
VeinsteinGilles. 2001. ‘Sur les nâ’ib ottomans’. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, vol. 25: 247–67.
57.
VeinsteinGilles. 2003. ‘Les Ottomans: Fonctionnarisation des clercs, cléricalisation de l’Etat?’, in Histoires des hommes de Dieu dans l’Islam et le Christianisme, edited by Iogna-PratDominiqueVeinsteinGillesParis: Flammarion: 179–204.
58.
Yurdakulİlhami. 2008. Osmanlı İlmiye Merkez Teşkilâtı’nda Reform (1826–1876). Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
59.
ZarinebafFariba. 2010. Crime and Punishment in Istanbul: 1700–1800. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
60.
Ze’eviDror. 1998. ‘The Use of Ottoman Court Records as a Source for Middle Eastern Social History: A Reappraisal.’ Islamic Law and Society, vol. 5: 35–56.
61.
ZilfiMadeline C.1988. The Politics of Piety: The Ottoman Ulema in the Postclassical Age. Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica.
