This research paper inspects the comparative performance evaluation of banks sponsored Indian mutual funds using traditional measure. The data comprises 166 open-ended equity, debt, liquid and equity linked saving schemes (tax savings) schemes during the period of April 2006–March 2017. The evidence shows that all sample schemes are well diversified. Public sector banks sponsored get first ranked because good return, all positive and diversified schemes and efficient performance of portfolio management as compared to Private sector and UTI banks sponsored mutual funds.
AckermannC.McEnallyR.RavenscraftD. (1999). The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives. The Journal of finance, 54(3), 833–874.
2.
AgarwalS.MirzaN. (2017). A study on the risk-adjusted performance of mutual funds industry In India. Review of Innovation and Competitiveness, 3(1), 75–94.
3.
AnandaS.MurugaiahV. (2006). Analysis of components of investment performance – An empirical study of mutual funds in India. (December18, 2006). 10th Indian Institute of Capital Markets Conference.
4.
Alam & Qadar. (2015). Evaluating Pakistan’s mutual fund performance: Validating through CAPM and Fama French 3-factor model. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 10(1), 173–182.
5.
AlekhyaP. (2012). A study on performance evaluation of public & private sector mutual funds in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 1(2), 147–168.
6.
AroraK. (2015). Risk-adjusted performance evaluation of Indian mutual fund schemes. Paradigm, 19(1), 79–94.
7.
Arshdeep. (2011). Persistence in performance of equity mutual funds in India: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Management and Computing Sciences, 1(3), 77–86.
8.
ArugaslanO.EdwardsE.SamantA. (2008). Risk adjusted performance of international mutual funds. Managerial Finance, 34(1), 5–22.
9.
BabarS.NawazS.AshrafS. (2013). A comparative study on performance evaluation of Pakistani mutual funds. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(1), 151–165.
10.
BabbarS.SehgalS. (2018). Mutual fund characteristics and investment performance in India. Management and Labor Studies, 43(1&2), 1–30.
11.
BarberB. M.OdeanT.ZhengL. (2000). The behavior of mutual fund investors. (Working Paper). Oakland, CA: University of California.
12.
CaiJ.ChanK. C.YamadaT. (1997). The performance of Japanese mutual funds. The Review of Financial studies, 10(2), 237–273.
13.
CaponN.FitzsimonsG. J.WeingartenR. (1994). Affluent investors and mutual fund purchases. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 12(3), 17–25.
14.
ChanderR. (2000). Performance appraisal of mutual funds in India. Finance India, 14(4), 1256–1261.
15.
ChangE. C.LewellenW. C. (1984). Market timing and Mutual fund investment performance. Journal of business, 57(1), 57–72.
16.
ChangE. C.NelsonW. A.WitteH. D. (2012). Do green mutual funds perform well?, Management Research Review, 35(8), 693–708.
17.
ChenH. C.LaiC. W.WuS. C. (2016). Mutual fund selection and performance persistence in 401(k) Plans. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 78–100.
18.
CumbyR.GlenJ. (1990). Evaluating the performance of international mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 497–521.
19.
DritsakisN.GroseC.KalyvasL. (2006). Performance aspects of Greek bond mutual funds. International Review of Financial Analysis15, 189–202.
20.
FriendI.BrownF. E.HermanE. S.VickersD. (1962). A study of mutual funds. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
HiliJ.PaceD.GrimaS. (2016). Equity mutual fund performance evaluation: An Emerging market Perspective. Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, 97, 93–132.
22.
IppolitoR. (1989). Efficiency with costly information: A study of mutual fund performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 1–23.
23.
JagricT.PodobnikB.StrasekS.JagricV. (2007). Risk-adjusted performance of mutual funds: Some tests. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2, 233–244.
24.
JaksicM.LekovicM.MilanovicM. (2015). Measuring the performance of mutual funds-a case study. Industrija, 43(1), 37–51.
25.
JensenM. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416.
26.
KandpalV.KavidayalP. C. (2011). Performance evaluation of mutual funds in India – A comparative study of public and private sector mutual funds. International Conference on Financial Innovation & Change for Survival & Growth. MDI Gurgaon.
27.
KarM.ShilP. (2016). A comparative study on performance evaluation of selected mutual fund open-ended growth scheme in India. Finance India, 30(1), 173–188.
28.
KaurI. (2017). Performance of equity mutual fund and educational credentials of fund manager. Vision, 21(1), 23–34.
29.
KonS.JenF. C. (1979). The investment performance of mutual funds: An empirical investigation of timing, selectivity and market efficiency. Journal of Business, 52, 263–289.
30.
KorkeamakiT. P.SmytheI. T. (2004). Effects of market segmentation and bank concentration on Mutual Fund expenses and returns: Evidence from Finland. European Financial Management, 10(3), 413–438.
31.
LaesM. A.SilvaM. E. (2014). Performance of mutual equity funds in Brazil – A bootstrap analysis. EconomiA, 15(3), 294–306.
32.
LakshmiN.DeoM.MurugesanB. (2008). Performance of the Indian mutual funds: A study with special reference to growth schemes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 4(3), 75–81.
33.
LemeshkoO.RejnusO. (2015). Performance evaluation of equity mutual funds in countries with emerging economies: Evidence from BRIC, CEE, sea and MENA regions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 476–486.
34.
LhabitantF. S. (1995). Mutual funds performance: Empirical tests on the Swiss market. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 9, 330–351.
35.
MansorF.BhattiM. I. (2011). Risk and return analysis on performance of the Islamic mutual funds: Evidence from Malaysia. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 4(1), 19–31.
36.
MarkowitzH. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
37.
McDonaldJ. G. (1974). Individual investors and mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 434–438.
38.
ModiglianiF.ModiglianiL. (1997). Risk-adjusted performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(2), 45–54.
39.
MuthappanP. K.DamodharanE. (2006). Risk adjusted performance evaluation of Indian mutual fund schemes. Finance India, 20(3), 965–983.
40.
PanwarS.MadhumathiR. (2006). Characteristics and performance evaluation of selected mutual funds in India. In Indian Institute of Capital Markets 9th Capital Markets Conference Paper.
41.
PrasadK.PrasadC. (2012). Performance of selected mutual funds: A comparative study on public and private sector balanced funds. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(9), 267–278.
42.
PuriH. (2010). Performance evaluation of balanced mutual fund schemes in Indian scenario. Paradigm, 14(2), 20–28.
43.
RamasamyB.YeungM. C. H. (2003). Evaluating mutual funds in an emerging market, factors that matter to financial advisors. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(3), 122–136.
44.
RaoN.MadavaR. (2003). Performance evaluation of Indian mutual funds. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=433100 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.433100.
45.
RedmanL. A.GulletN. S.ManakyanH. (2000). The performance of global and international mutual funds. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 13(1), 75–85.
46.
SappT.TiwariA. (2004). Does stock return momentum explain the smart money effect?The Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2605–2622.
47.
SharpeW. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39, 119-138.
48.
SinghP.SinglaS. K. (2000). Evaluation of performance of mutual funds using risk return relationship models. The Indian Journal of Commerce, 53(3), 54–59.
49.
SoderlindP.DahlquistM.EngstromS. (2000). Performance and characteristics of Swedish mutual funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(3), 409–423.
50.
TavakoliM. R.GlabadanidisP. (2012). Evaluation of Malaysian mutual funds in the maximum drawdown risk measure framework. International Journal of Managerial Finance9(3), 247–270.
51.
TrainorW. J. (2012). Performance measurement of high yield bond mutual funds. Management Research Review, 33(6), 609–619.
52.
TreynorJ. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43, 63–73.
53.
TripathyN. (2004). An empirical analysis on performance evaluation of mutual funds in India: A study on equity linked savings schemes. ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 10(7), 36–55.
54.
YuziA.SamsuddinS.ShairS. N.HaznyM. H. (2012). Performance evaluation of Islamic mutual funds in Malaysia based on asset portfolio. International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE).
55.
ZaheeruddinM.SivakumarP.ReddyK. S. (2013). Performance evaluation of mutual funds in India with special reference to selected financial intermediaries. Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 34–40.
