The purpose of this article is to investigate the relationship between personality traits and marketing specialization preferences among management students. Specialization should be selected on the basis of personality types and Holland’s RAISEC framework is an ideal tool for knowing the same. A right match between personality and specialization selection may help an individual for giving his/her best to the profession. The ‘Ten Item Personality Inventory’ method was used to collect responses, along with some demographic information such as gender, work experience and intended major specialization from 200 management students through surveys. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the data. The findings reveal that out of five personality traits (Big Five), only the extraversion trait has significant contribution in choosing marketing as a specialization. They also show that gender and work experience do not have a significant impact on students for choosing their management specialization. The research was conducted in one business school and only for marketing, and hence, the results cannot be generalized. The article demonstrates the importance of personality assessment before choosing a management specialization and will be useful for management students aspiring to select ‘Marketing’ as their specialization. It may also help teachers and career counsellors while assisting students during the career selection process.
AdamsS.H.PryorL.J.AdamsS.L. (1994). Attraction and retention of high-aptitude students in accounting: An exploratory longitudinal study. Issues in Accounting Education, 9(1), 45–58.
2.
AstinA.W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
BarrickM.R.MountM.K.GuptaR. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 51, 45–74.
6.
BeffyM.FougereD.MaurelA. (2012). Choosing the field of study in postsecondary education: Do expected earnings matter?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 334–347.
7.
BoothP.WinzarH. (1993). Personality biases of accounting students: Some implications for learning style preferences. Accounting and Finance, 33(2), 109–120.
8.
ChackoH.E. (1991). Can you pick out the accountant? Students’ interest and career choices. Journal of Education for Business, 66(3), 151–154.
9.
ChurchA.T. (1994). Relating the Tellegen and five factor models of personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 898–909.
10.
ConleyD.SimonD. (1993). Testing for personality bias in evaluating agribusiness students. Agribusiness, 9(2), 119–127.
11.
CoperthwaiteC.KnightW. (1995). Student input, student involvement, and college environment factors impacting the choice of academic major. AIR Annual Forum, Boston, MA.
12.
DawisR.V.LofquistL.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
DesslerG.VarkkeyB. (2009). Human resource management. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.
14.
DowneyJ.McGaugheyR.RoachD. (2009). MIS versus computer science: An empirical comparison of the influences on the students’ choice of major. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3), 357–368.
15.
EcclesJ.S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2(2), 62–72.
16.
ElnarR.D.B. (2014). Personality traits and occupational interest: Basis for career guidance program. Developing County Studies, 4(13), 91–102.
17.
FeldmanK.A.SmartJ.C.EthingtonC. (1999). Major field and person-environment fit: Using Holland’s theory to study change and stability in college students. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 642–669.
18.
FortinA.AmernicJ.H. (1994). A descriptive profile of intermediate accounting students. Contemporary Accounting Research (Special Education Research Issue), 10(S1), 21–73.
19.
FurnhamA.EracleousA.Chamorro-PremuzicT.(2009). Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(8). Retrieved 14April2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215867349?accountid=31259
20.
GoslingS.D.RentfrowP.J.SwannW.B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
21.
GulF.A.FongS.C.C. (1993). Predicting success for introductory accounting students: Some further Hong Kong experience. Accounting Education, 2(1), 33–42.
22.
HaemmerlieF.M.RobinsonD.A.CarmenR.C. (1991). “Type A” personality traits and adjustment to college. Journal of College Student Development, 32(1), 81–82.
23.
HansenJ.NeumanJ. (1999). Evidence of concurrent prediction of the Campbell Interest and Skill Survey (CISS) for college major selection. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(3), 239–248.
24.
HollandJ.L. (1959). A theory of occupational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1), 35–45.
25.
HugstadP. (1997). Marketing the marketing major. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 4–13.
26.
HuntS.FalgianiA.IntrieriR. (2004). The nature and origins of students’ perceptions of accountants. Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 142–148.
27.
KaplanR.S. (2008). Reaching your potential. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 45–49.
28.
KimD.MarkhamF.S.CangelosiJ.D. (2002). Why students pursue the business degree: A comparison of business majors across universities. Journal of Education for Business, 78(1), 28–32.
29.
KochunnyC.M.RogersH.P.OgbuehiA. (1992). Maccoby’s head/heart traits: Marketing versus accounting students. Journal of Education for Business, 67(6), 371–376.
30.
KramerG.L.HigleyH.OlsenD. (1994). Changes in academic major among undergraduate students. College & University, 69(2), 88–90.
31.
KreiserL.McKeonJ.M.Jr.PostA. (1990). A personality profile of CPA’s in public practice. The Ohio CPA Journal, winter, 29–34.
32.
LarsonL. M.RotthinghausP. J.BorgenF.H. (2002). Meta-analyses of big six interests and big five personality variables. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 61(2), 217–239.
33.
LawrenceR.TaylorL.W. (2000). Student personality type versus grading procedures in intermediate accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 76(1), 28–35.
34.
LopukhovaN.BezvidnayaO. (2014). The way a student selects a specialisation in economic higher education institution. Procedia-Social and Behaviour Sciences, 152, 1087–1090.
35.
McPhersonB. (1999). Correlating students’ personality types with their rating of topics covered in business communication classes. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(3), 46–53.
36.
MillerM.J.MillerT.A. (2005). Theoretical application of Holland’s theory of individual decision-making styles: Implications for career counsellors. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42(1), 20–28.
37.
MyersI.B.McCaulleyM.H. (1985). A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
38.
NoelM.N.MichaelsC.LevasM.G. (2003). The relationship of personality traits and self-monitoring behavior to choice of business major. Journal of Education for Business, 78(3), 153–157.
39.
OswickC.BarberP. (1998). Personality type and performance in an introductory level accounting course: A research note. Accounting Education, 7(3), 249–254.
40.
PascarellaE.T.TerenziniP.T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
PikeG.R. (2006). Vocational preferences and college expectations: An extension of Holland’s principle of self-selection. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 591–612.
42.
PorterS.R.UmbachP.D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429–449.
RamseyA.HanlonD.SmithD. (2000). The association between cognitive style and accounting students’ preference for cooperative learning: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting Education, 18(2), Spring, 215–228.
45.
RoachD.McGaugheyR.DowneyJ. (2011). Gender within the IT major—a retrospective study of factors that lead students to select an IT major. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 7(2), 149–165.
46.
RoweF.A.WatersM.L.ThompsonM.P.HansonK. (1992). Can personality-type instruments profile majors in management programs?Journal of Education for Business, 68(1), 10–14.
47.
ScheinE.H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48.
SchleeR.CurrenM.KieslerT.HarichK. (2007). Perception bias among undergraduate business students by major. Journal of Education for Business, 82(3), 169–177.
49.
SchloemerP.G.SchloemerM.S. (1997). The personality types and preferences of CPA firm professionals: An analysis of changes in the profession. Accounting Horizons, 11(4), 24–39.
50.
ShackletonV. (1980, November). The accountant stereotype: Myth or reality?Accountancy, 9(1047), 122–123.
51.
SiegelG. (2000). The image of corporate accountants. Strategic Finance, 82(2), 71–72.
52.
SlocumJ.W.HellriegelD. (2009). Fundamentals of organizational behaviour. New Delhi: Cengage Learning India Private Limited.
53.
SmartJ.C.FeldmanK.A.EthingtonC.A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
54.
StrasserS.OzgurC.SchroederD. (2002). Selecting a business major: An analysis of criteria and choice using the analytical hierarchy process. Mid-America Journal of Business, 17(2), 47–56.
55.
SullivanB.A.HansenJ.C. (2004). Mapping associations between interests and personality: Toward a conceptual understanding of individual difference in vocational behaviour. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 287–298.
56.
Taylor Research and Consulting Group. (2000). AICPA student and academic research study: Final quantitative report. Portsmouth, NH: Taylor Research and Consulting Group.
57.
VrugtA.LangereisM.P.HoogstratenJ. (1997). Academic self-efficacy and malleability of relevant capabilities as predictors of exam performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(1), 61–72.
58.
WheelerP. (2001). The Myers–Briggs type indicator and applications to accounting education and research. Issues in Accounting Education, 16(1), 125–150.
59.
WoodF.B. (2004). Preventing post-parchment depression: A model of career counseling for college seniors. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41(2), 71–79.
60.
ZhangL. (2007). Do personality traits make a difference in teaching styles among Chinese high school teachers?Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 669–679.
