Abstract
The argument is that recurrent famines, which are more likely to occur during rapid socio-economic, technological and institutional transitions, introduce long- term changes in gender relations. This is presented through a model of 'famine leverage' on transformations of gender relations, which is then examined with respect to British Indian famine policy and the present-day nutritional outcomes in a north Indian village. The pursuit of cost-effective relief and reinterpretations of 'custom' led to a capture of malevolent potentialities in famine strategies, entrenching gender roles which are detrimental to men's and women's well-being. Part of the reason was a trade-off in relief between supporting independent women's livelihoods and releasing funds for the development of roads, railways, irrigation and conservancy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
