Norway is often seen as a “world champion” in gender equality. Norwegian aid policies on gender often emphasize how lessons can be learned from “the Norwegian model” and experiences. This article explores the extent to which Norway’s domestic gender policies have influenced the country’s aid policies. The analysis, which is based on literature review of Norwegian gender equality history and discursive analysis of the current gender and aid policy documents, reveals that the essence of Norwegian domestic gender equality politics—social policies that address the relationship between care and breadwinning—is largely missing in Norway’s aid policies. While we doubt whether a specific model can be exported, we suggest that Norwegian experiences may provide valuable inputs for development aid policies. Since Norwegian aid policies tend to reflect the dominating international aid discourse, our analysis has relevance beyond the particular Norwegian case. We argue that policies of care, motherhood and fatherhood, should be at the heart of the Norwegian and international aid policies.
AcholonuC.O. (1995). Motherism: The Afrocentric alternative to feminism. Owerri: AFA Publications.
2.
African Union. (2003). Protocol to the African charter on human and people’s rights on the rights of women in Africa (July11, 2003). Retrieved February 24, 2013, from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3f4b139d4.html
3.
AlfersL.C. (2006). Stirring the hornet’s nest: Women’s citizenship and childcare in post-apartheid South Africa Unpublished master’s thesis. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
4.
BacchiC. (1999). Women, policy and politics. London: Sage Publications.
5.
BacchiC. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
6.
BervenN. (2010). Gender equality and policies towards women as mothers in the contemporary Norwegian welfare state. In KahlertH.ErnstW. (Eds), Reframing demographic change in Europe: Perspectives on gender and welfare state transformation (pp. 73–93). Münster: LIT Verlag.
7.
BiancoB. (2000). Gender & material culture in West Pokot, Kenya. In HodgsonD.L. (Ed.), Rethinking pastoralism in Africa (pp. 29–42). Oxford: James Currey.
8.
BlomI. (2004). Widows, widowers and the construction of the Norwegian welfare society, c. 1900–1960s. Scandinavian Journal of History, 29(3/4), 263–275.
9.
BorchorstA. (2009). Woman-friendly policy paradoxes? Childcare policies and gender equality visions in Scandinavia. In MelbyK.RavnA.B.WetterbergC.C. (Eds), Gender equality and welfare policies in Scandinavia: The limits of political ambition? (pp. 27–42). Bristol: The Policy Press.
10.
BorchorstA.SiimB. (2008). Woman-friendly policies and state feminism: Theorizing Scandinavian gender equality. Feminist Theory, 9(2), 207–224.
11.
BorchorstA.TeigenM.(2009). Who is at issue—what is at stake? Intersectionality in Danish and Norwegian gender equality policies. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Lisbon, April 14 – 19, 2009.
12.
CoolsS.FivaJ.H.KirkebøenL.J. (2011). “Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents.” Oslo, Discussion Papers No. 657, Statistics Norway, Research Department, Oslo.
13.
CromptonR. (2001). Gender restructuring, employment, and caring. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8(3), 266–291.
14.
Datta GuptaN.SmithN.VernerM. (2006). Child care and parental leave in the Nordic countries: A model to aspire to?Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
15.
EllingsæterA.L. (1998). Dual breadwinner societies: Provider models in the Scandinavian welfare states. Acta Sociologica, 41(1), 59–73.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FraserN. (1994). After the family wage: Gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory, 22(4), 591–618.
18.
FraserN. (2002). After the family wage: A postindustrial thought experiment. In MuiC.L.MurpyJ.S. (Eds), Gender struggles: Practical approaches to contemporary feminism (pp. 69–93). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
19.
GiddensA. (2003). The progressive agenda. New ideas for the Centre-Left. In BrownM.ThompsonP.SainsburyF. (Eds), Progressive futures (pp. 3–45). London: Policy Network.
20.
GornickJ.MeyersM. (2004). More alike than different: Revisiting the long-term prospects for developing “European-style” work/family policies in the United States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(3), 251–273.
21.
GullestadM. (1992). The art of social relations: Essays on culture, social action and everyday life in modern Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
22.
HaasL.RostgaardT. (2011). Fathers’ rights to paid parental leave in the Nordic countries: Consequences for the gendered division of leave. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 177–195.
23.
HamerJ.HamerI. (1994). Impact of a cash economy on complementary gender relations among the Sadāma of Ethiopia. Anthropological Quarterly, 67(4), 187–202.
24.
HernesH.M. (1987). Welfare state and women power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
25.
HobsonB. (2004). The individualised worker, the gender participatory and the gender equity models in Sweden. Social Policy and Society, 3(1), 75–83.
26.
HolstC. (2007). Balansefeminismens Begrensninger (Feminism of balance constraints), Tidsskrift for Kjønnsforskning (Journal for Gender Research), 2, 5–20.
27.
JelinE. (2008). Gender and the family in public policy. A comparative view of Argentina and Sweden. In KabeerN.StarkA.MagnusE. (Eds), Global perspectives on gender equality (pp. 40–63). New York and London: Routledge.
28.
KabeerN. (2008). Passion, pragmatism, and the politics of advocacy. The Nordic experience through a “gender and development” lens. In KabeerN.StarkA.MagnusE. (Eds), Global perspectives on gender equality (pp. 244–277). New York and London: Routledge.
29.
KabeerN.MagnusE.StarkA. (2008a). Introduction. Reversing the gaze. In KabeerN.StarkA.MagnusE. (Eds), Global perspectives on gender equality (pp. 1–18). New York and London: Routledge.
30.
KabeerN.StarkA.MagnusE. (Eds) (2008b). Global perspective on gender equality. New York and London: Routledge.
31.
KnudsenK.WærnessK. (2009). Shared or separate? Money management and changing norms of gender equality among Norwegian couples. Community, Work & Family, 12(1), 39–55.
32.
KovenS.MichelS. (1990). Womanly duties: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880–1920. The American Historical Review, 95(4), 1076–1108.
33.
KuhnleS. (2000). The Scandinavian welfare state in the 1990s: Challenged but viable. West European Politics, 23(2), 209–228.
34.
KuhnleS.HortS.E.O. (2004). The developmental welfare state in Scandinavia: Lessons for the developing world. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
35.
LarsenB.R. (2010). Becoming part of welfare Scandinavia: Integration through the spatial dispersal of newly arrived refugees in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2), 333–350.
36.
LeiraA. (2009). Welfare states and working mothers: The Scandinavian experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LewisJ. (2001b). The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8(2), 152–169.
39.
ListerR. (2009). A Nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states. Social Politics, 16(2), 242–278.
40.
MahonR. (2002). Childcare: Toward what kind of “social Europe”?Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 9(3), 343–379.
41.
MelbyK.PylkkänenA.RosenbeckB.WetterbergC.C. (2006). The Nordic model of marriage. Women’s History Review, 15(4), 651–661.
42.
MorellR.RichterL. (2006). Introduction. In MorellR.RichterL. (Eds), Baba, Men and fatherhood in South Africa (pp. 1–12). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
43.
MulinariD.KeskinenS.IrniS.TuoriS. (2009). Introduction: Postcolonialism and the Nordic models of welfare and gender. In KeskinenS.TuoriS.IrniS.MulinariD. (Eds), Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region (pp. 1–18). Farnham: Ashgate.
44.
Norwegian Ministry of Children and Equality. (2009). Men, male roles and gender equality. Oslo: Author.
45.
Norwegian Ministry of Children Equality and Social Inclusion. (2011). Likestilling 2014. Regjerningens handlingsplan for likestilling mellom Kjønnene (Gender equality 2014. The government’s action plan for gender equality). Oslo: Author.
46.
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1997). Strategi for Kvinne- og Likestillingsrettet Utviklingssamarbeid 1997–2005 (Strategy for women and gender equality in develpment co-operation 1997-2005). Oslo: Author.
47.
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2007). Action plan for women’s rights and gender equality in development cooperation 2007–2009. Oslo: Author.
48.
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2008). St.meld.nr.11 (2007–2008). På Like Vilkår: Kvinners Rettigheter og Likestilling i Utviklingspolitikken (On equal terms: Women’s rights and gender equality in development policy). Oslo: Author.
49.
NzegwuN. (1994). Gender equality in a dual-sex system: The case of Onitsha. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 7(1), 73.
50.
OrloffA.S. (2006). From maternalism to “employment for all.” State policies to promote women’s employment across the affluent democracies. In LevyJ.D. (Ed.), The state after statism: New state activities in the age of liberalization (pp. 230–268). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
51.
ØstebøM.T. (2010). Wayyuu—Women’s respect and rights among the Arsi-Oromo. In EgeS.AspenH.TeferraBirhanuBekeleShiferaw (Eds), Research in Ethiopian studies (pp. 405–417). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
52.
OyĕwùmíO. (2002). Conceptualising gender: The Eurocentric foundation of feminist concepts and the challenge of African epistemology. JENDA: A Journal of Culture and African Women Studies, 2(1). Retrieved April 26, 2013, from http://codesria.org/spip.php?article579
53.
PalmbergM. (2009). The Nordic colonial mind. In MulinariD.KeskinenS.IrniS.TuoriS (Eds), Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region (pp. 35–50). Farnham: Ashgate.
54.
SainsburyD. (2001). Gender and the making of welfare states: Norway and Sweden. Social Politics, 8(1), 113–143.
55.
SelbervikH. (2003). Power of the purse? Norway as a donor in the conditionality epoch 1980–2000. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Bergen, Bergen.
56.
TalleA. (1987). Women as heads of houses: The organization of production and the role of women among pastoral Maasai in Kenya. Ethnos, 52(1-2), 50–80.
57.
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2012. Gender Equality and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
58.
TvedtT. (2009). Utviklingshjelp, Utenrikspolitikk og Makt. Den Norske Modellen. (Development Assistance, Foreign Policy and Power. The Nowegian Model). Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
59.
UN. (1980).Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW).
60.
WetterbergC.C.MelbyK. (2009). The claim of economic citizenship: The concept of equality in a historical context. In MelbyK.RavnA.WetterbergC.C. (Eds), Gender equality and welfare politics in Scandinavia. The limits of political ambition? (pp. 43–62). Bristol: The Policy Press.
61.
World Health Organization. (2010). Policy approaches to engaging men and boys in achieving gender equality and health equity. Geneva: World Health Organization.
