This article analyzes the gender socialization patterns and masculine constructions of a group of adolescent boys living in single-mother households. Data collection methods such as observation and interviews were employed together with interpretive techniques to explain how the participants constructed their realities based on their experiences. The results revealed that gender socialization of adolescent boys took place when their single mothers—pressured by dramatic physical changes in their adolescent sons—concluded that the boys were already men, and admonished them to act as expected of men. Gender socialization also took place when mothers observed in the behavior of their adolescent boys traits regarded as typically male, which they (mothers) did not like; and also when the mothers, in response to harsh socioeconomic and other adverse conditions, directed their sons’ attention to the failure of their absent fathers to perform traditionally defined masculine roles in the families. The attitudes of the participants to male gender were revealed in their notion of fathers as providers and figures of authority, and in their involvement in gang-related activities and other risky behaviors associated with masculinity.
AncerJ. (2010, April18). What parents must know about raising a boy. Sunday Times, Education, South Africa, p. 4.
3.
AnderssonG. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries. Demographic Research, 7(7), 343–364.
4.
BabbieE.MoutonJ. (2002). The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaschC.E. (1987). Focus group interview: An under-utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 14(4), 411–448.
6.
BeaujotR.LiuJ. (2002). Children, social assistance and outcomes: Cross national comparisons (Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 304).
7.
BlessC.SmithH. (1995). Fundamentals of social research. Cape Town: Jutas & Co.
8.
BodganR.TaylorS.J. (1999). Introduction to quantitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Chichester: John Wiley.
9.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
BrodyC.J.SteelmanL.C. (1985). Sibling structure and parental sex-typing of children household tasks. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(2), 265–273.
11.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP.A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In LemerR.M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.
12.
BrymanA. (2004). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
CleaverF. (2002). Masculinity matter: Men, gender and development. Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip.
16.
CreswellJ.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
17.
CrouterA.NMankeB.A.McHaleS.M. (1995). The family context of gender intensification in early adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 317–329.
18.
CrouterA.N.WhitemanS.D.McHaleS.M.OsgoodW. (2007). Development of gender attitude traditionally across middle childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 78(3), 911–929.
19.
DanielsD. (2006). Using visual methods to bring marginalized people to the centre. In MerriamS.B.CourtenayB.C.CerveroR.M. (Eds), Global issues and adult education: Perspectives from Latin America, South Africa and the United States (pp. 129–142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
DavisF. (2004). Stress and coping skills of educators with a learner with a physical disability in inclusive classrooms in the Western Cape. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
21.
de VosA.SSrydomH.FoucheC.B.DelportC.S.L. (2002). Research at grass roots. Sandton, South Africa: Van Schalk Publishers.
22.
DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
23.
DonaldsonP.J. (2001). Using photographs to strengthen family planning research. International Family Planning Perspective, 27(3), 148–151.
24.
Duhon-SellsR. (1995). Dealing with youth violence: What schools and communities need to know. Bloomington, Indiana: National Education Service.
25.
DumkaL.E.GonzalesN.A.BondsD.D.MillsapR.E. (2009). Academic success of Mexican origin adolescent boys and girls: The role of mothers’ and fathers’ parenting and cultural orientation. Sex Roles, 60(7–8), 588–599.
26.
FieldS. (2001). Lost communities, living memories: Remembering forced removals in South Africa. Cape Town: David Philip.
27.
GalambosN.L.AlmeidaD.M.PetersenA.C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61(6), 1905–1914.
28.
GlaserB.G.StraussA.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
29.
GoodnowJ. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 5–26.
30.
HarperD. (2005). What’s new visually. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 747–762). California: SAGE.
31.
HeckR.H. (2006). Conceptualizing and conducting meaningful research studies in education. In ConradC.F.SerkinR.C. (Eds), The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 373–392). London: SAGE.
32.
HillJ.P.LynchM.E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Brooks-GunnJ.PetersenA. (Eds), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychological perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.
33.
HustonA.C. (1983). Sex-typing. In MussenP. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality and social development (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 387–468). New York: Willey.
34.
KatzP.A.KsansnakK.R. (1994), Developmental aspects of gender role flexibility and traditionality in middle childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 272–282.
35.
KellyJ.B.EmeryR.E. (2002). Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resiliency perspectives. Family Relations, 52(4), 352–362.
36.
KruegerR.A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
37.
LahikainenA.R.TolonenK.KraavI. (2008). Young children’s subjective well-being and family discontents in a changing cultural context. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 65–85.
38.
LindeggerG.MaxwellJ. (2007). Teenage masculinity and double bind of conformity to hegemonic standard. In SheferT.RateleK.StrebelA.ShabalalaN.BuikemaR. (Eds), From boys to men: Social constructions of masculinity in contemporary society (pp. 94–111). Landowne, South Africa: UTC Press.
39.
MacCallumF.GolombokS. (2004). Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: A follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45(8), 1407–1419.
40.
MashE.J.WolfeD.A. (2002). Abnormal child psychology. Belmont: Thomas Wadsworth.
41.
McHaleS.M.CrouterA.C.BartkoW.T. (1992). Traditional and egalitarian patterns of parental involvement: Antecedents, consequences, and temporal rhythms. In FeathermanD.LemerR.PerlmutterM. (Eds), Lifespan development and behavior (Vol. 11) (pp. 144–173). New York: Erlbaum.
MerriamS.B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
MontemaorR. (2001). Parental monitoring. In LemerJ.V.LemerR.M.FinkelsteinJ. (Eds), Adolescence in America: An encyclopedia (Vol. II, pp. 481–484). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
45.
MorrellR. (2007). Do you want to be a father? School-going youth in Durban schools at the turn of the 21st century. In SheferT.RateleK.StrebelA.ShabalalaN.BuikemaR. (Eds), From boys to men: Social constructions of masculinity in contemporary society (pp. 75–93). Landowne, South Africa: UTC Press.
46.
MorseJ.M. (1994). Critical issues in qualitative project: Details and dialogue. London: Heinemann Educational.
47.
MukeshG. (2003). Psychological behavior of adolescent learners from divorced families in Newlands West. Unpublished master’s degree dissertation, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
48.
NeumanW.L. (2006). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
PattonM.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: SAGE.
50.
PattonM.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
51.
PleckJ.H. (1997). Parental involvement: Levels sources and consequences. In LambM.E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 67–103). New York: Wiley.
52.
PopenoeD. (1996). Life without a father. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53.
PrinceC. (2009, July12). The changing face of South African family: Single moms now the norm. Sunday Times, South Africa, p. 3.
54.
RubieD.N.MartinC.L. (1998). Gender development. In DamonW.EisenbergN. (Eds), The handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 933–1016). New York: John Willey.
SealeS. (2001). Qualitative methods: Validity and reliability. European Journal of Cancer Care, 10(2), 133–144.
57.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interview as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
ShermanR.WebbR. (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. London: Falmer.
59.
SilvermanD. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: SAGE.
60.
SmitR. (2001). The impact of labor migration on African families in South Africa: Yesterday and today. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 533–548.
61.
SuitorJ.J.SechristJ.PilkuhnM.PardoS.T.PillemerK. (2008). Within-family differences in parent-child relations across the life course. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 17(5), 334–338.
62.
SylvesterF.J. (2010). At risk youth: The experiences of adolescent boys with absent fathers. Master’s degree dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
63.
TannerJ.L. (2002). Parental separation and divorce: Can we provide an ounce of prevention. Pediatrics, 110(5), 1007–1009.
64.
Terre-BlancheM.DurrheimK. (1999). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
65.
TomaJ.D. (2006). Approaching rigor in applied qualitative research. In ConradC.F.SerlinR.C. (Eds), The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 405–424). London: SAGE.
66.
TuckerC.J.McHaleS.M.CrouterA.C. (2003). Dimensions of mothers’ and fathers’ differential treatment of siblings: Links with adolescents’ sex-typed personal qualities. Family Relations, 52(1), 82–89.
67.
SylvesterF.J. (2010). At risk youth: The experiences of adolescent boys with absent fathers. Master’s degree dissertation, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
68.
The Concise Oxford Dictionary. (1999). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
UpdegraffK.A.DelgadoM.Y.WheelerL.A. (2008). Exploring mothers’ and fathers’ relationships with sons versus daughters: Links to adolescent adjustment in Mexican immigrant families. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 60(7–8), 559–574.
70.
Vaden-KiernanN.IalongoN.S.PearsonJ.KellamS. (1995). Household family structure and children’s aggressive behavior: A longitudinal study of urban elementary school children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(5), 553–568.
71.
WhiteL.K.BrinkerhoffD.B. (1981). The sexual division of labor: Evidence from childhood. Social Forces, 60(1), 170–181.
72.
WrightR. (1994). Rite of passage. New York: HarperCollins.
