This study seeks to identify practical approaches for raising the work profile of South Korean women scientists and engineers (S&Es), based on a survey of 300 women employees and their employers. Although women S&Es have a proven track record in South Korean industry, they face discrimination and less-than-hospitable work environments. Their careers in industry seem to hinge more on attributes such as dependability, subject matter expertise, and clerical skills than on the ability to lead, as a result of which they are relegated to subservient roles. When placed in the matrix of South Korean societal mores, these findings suggest that women S&Es could benefit from both individualized strategies and broader support programs focusing on the diverse needs of women across various strata of society.
BentleyR.J.BlackburnR.T. (1992). Two decades of gains for women faculty?Teachers College Record, 93(4), 697–709.
3.
BhavnaniS.AlridgeM.D. (2000). Teamwork across disciplinary borders: A bridge between college and the work place. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 13–16.
4.
Dana-PicardT.KidronI.KomarM.SteinerJ. (2005). Undergraduate engineering—A comparative study of first year performance in single gender campuses. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 469–476.
5.
DaudtJ.SalgadoP.P. (2005). Creating a women friendly culture in institutes of higher engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 463–468.
6.
DuX. (2006). Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 35–42.
7.
EvansD.L.BeakleyG.C.CrouchP.E.YamaguchiG.T. (1993). Attributes of engineering graduates and their impact on curriculum design. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(4), 203–211.
8.
GilbertF. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861–878.
9.
GoodmanS. (2003). Europe is pushing to get more women scientists into industry and academia, but can the commission legislate for gender equality? Sally Goodman investigates. Nature, 426(6963), 210–211.
10.
GormanE.H. (2006). Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: The case of law firm partnership. Social Forces, 85(2), 865–890.
11.
IhsenS. (2005). Special gender studies for engineering?European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 487–494.
12.
Korea Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. (2006, August). Statistics system on national human resources. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.moe.go.kr
13.
Korea National Statistics Office. (2006, August). National Statistics Database. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from http://www.kostat.go.kr
14.
LangJ.D.CruseS.McVeyF.D.McMastersJ. (1999). Industry expectations of new engineers: A survey to assist curriculum designers. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 43–51.
15.
MarschkeR.LaursenS.NielsenJ.M.RankinP. (2007). Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 1–26.
16.
MartinR.MaythamB.CaseJ.FraserD. (2005). Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 167–180.
PisimisiS.S.IoannidesM.G. (2005). Developing mentoring relationships to support the careers of women in electrical engineering and computer technologies: An analysis on mentors’ competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 477–486.
19.
RavesteijnW.GraaffE.D.KroesenO. (2006). Engineering the future: The social necessity of communicative engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 63–71.
20.
SagebielF.DahmenJ. (2006). Masculinities in organizational cultures in engineering education in Europe: Results of the European Union project WomEng. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 5–14.
21.
ScottG.YatesK.W. (2002). Using successful graduates to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 363–378.
22.
ShinH.J. (2008). Career development of South Korean female scientists and engineers in industry. IDEAS, 15(1), 37–48.
23.
ShinH.J. (2009a). Childcare options in South Korea: Experiences and perceptions of women college faculty. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 2(1), 120–139.
24.
ShinH.J. (2009b). Employee and employer perceptions of retention of women scientists and engineers into industry. The Technology Interface Journal, 10(1), 1–16.
25.
SungS. (2003). Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian welfare state: The case of South Korea. Social Policy & Administration, 37(4), 342–360.
26.
ViefersS.F.ChristieM.F.FerdosF. (2006). Gender equity in higher education: Why and how? A case study of gender issues in a science faculty. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 15–22.
27.
WonS.PascallG. (2004). A Confucian war over childcare? Practice and policy in childcare and their implications for understanding the Korean gender regime. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 270–289.
