Commercial Surrogacy in India: An Ethical Assessment of Existing Legal Scenario from the Perspective of Women’s Autonomy and Reproductive Rights

Abstract

This article explores the reasons behind the rising popularity of commercial surrogacy in India against the backdrop of the landmark Baby Manji case, and its implications for the existing legal scenario and the debate on reproductive rights. It also highlights some ethical frames that have been applied in the Indian context. These include (a) the liberal feminist principle of women’s choice and freedom, which accepts contractual surrogacy as a service, as opposed to the socialist feminist principle of equity and fairness which regards it as potentially exploitative given the lack of economic opportunities to the surrogate, and (b) the extended equity principle, which questions India’s propriety in allowing “outsourcing” of pregnancy in a country with a dismal record of maternal mortality. In other words, a comparison is made between the reproductive rights and access to reproductive health facilities available to the average poor Indian woman with that available to the surrogates. The article argues that although these moral issues are pressing, they will not be resolved soon; therefore, it is important to consider legislation to regulate the surrogacy arrangements in India so that the welfare and the rights of the surrogates are safeguarded and exploitive practices minimized.

Keywords

Surrogacy India Baby Manji freedom of contract reproductive rights reproductive health Draft ART Bill 2010

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amnesty International USA. (2007). Stop violence against women: Reproductive rights. Stop Violence against Women (SVAW). New York: Amnesty International.

Bailey

(2011). Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia, 26(4), 715–741.

Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. (1995). Fourth World Conference on Women, 15 September 1995, A/CONF.177/20 and/CONF.177/20/Add. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.un.org

Bhandari

(2008, October 18). “Identity” for little Manji. The Times of India. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/times-of-india-the/mi_8012/is_20081019/identity-manji-jaipur/ai_n39508392/

Blakely

(2008, August 7). Surrogacy orphan trapped in red tape after mothers abandon her. The Times. Retrieved August 2, 2011, from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4474231.ece

Burke

(2010, July 30). India’s surrogate mothers face new rules to restrict “pot of gold.” The Guardian. Retrieved May 15, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/30/india-surrogate-mothers-law

Camber

(2008, December 12). Couple win fight for custody of “stateless” surrogate twins. Daily Mail. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1093922/Couple-win-fight-custody-stateless-surrogate-twins.html

Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (1999) Gen-eral Recommendation No. 24: Women and Health (Doc. No. A/54/38 Rev 1). Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/index.html

Cook

R.J.

Mahmoud

F.F.

(1996). Advancing reproductive rights beyond Cairo and Beijing. International Family Planning Perspectives, 22(3), 115–121.

10.

Dhar

(2009, January 26). India grapples with high maternal death rate. Reuters. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://in.reuters.com/

11.

Dolnick

(2007, December 30). Giving birth becomes latest job outsourced to India. USA Today. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-12-30-surrogacy_N.htm

12.

Economic Times. (2011, February 7). India’s per capita income to grow 17.3% at Rs 54,527 in FY’11. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-02-07/news/28433672_1_capita-income-data-on-national-income-economy-at-current-prices

13.

Government of India. (2009–2010). Economic Survey. Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2009-10/esmain.htm

14.

Greenhouse

(1991, June 2). French Supreme Court rules surrogate mother agreements illegal. The New York Times. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/02/world/french-supreme-court-rules-surrogate-mother-agreements-illegal.html

15.

Gupta

J.A.

(2006). Towards transnational feminisms: Some reflections and con-cerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(1), 23–38.

16.

Haworth

(2007). Surrogate mothers: Wombs for rent. Marie Claire. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from http://www.marieclaire.com/world-reports/news/international/surrogate-mothers-india

17.

Hindustan Times. (2008, November 3). Surrogate baby. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/restofasia/Surrogate-baby-born-in-India-arrives-in-Japan/Article1-348858.aspx

18.

Hirsch.

(2011, February 9). Our surrogacy laws put children at risk—Change is overdue. The Guardian. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/09/surrogacy-laws-children-at-risk

19.

HRLN. (2010) Summary of the case: Laxmi Mandal v Deen Dayal Hospital. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.escr-net.org/usr_doc/HRLN_Summary_-_Laxmi_Mandal_v_Deen_Dayal_Hospital.pdf

20.

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). (2005). National guidelines for accreditation, supervision & regulation of ART clinics in India. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.icmr.nic.in/art/art_clinics.htm

21.

Iyer

P.V.

(2010, April 18). 37.2 per cent of population BPL, 10 crore families to get food security. Indian Express. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.indianexpress.com/news/37.2-per-cent-of-population-bpl-10-crore-families-to-get-food-security/607963/

22.

Jagran Post (2011, January 27). Bill on surrogate mother waits approval of law ministry. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://post.jagran.com/bill-on-surrogate-mother-awaits-approval-of-law-ministry-1296102040

23.

Khan

(2008, September 18). Surrogacy is soaring in India. Hindustan Times. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.hindustantimes.com/Surrogacy-is-soaring-in-India/Article1-338809.aspx

24.

Krawiec

K.D.

(2009). Altruism and intermediation in the market for babies. Washington & Lee Law Review, 65(1), 203–257.

25.

Law Commission of India. (2009). Need for legislation to regulate assisted reproductive technology clinics as well as rights and obligations of parties to a surrogacy (Report No. 228). Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report228.pdf

26.

Mahapatra

(2010, May 27). German surrogate twins to go home. The Times of India. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/German-surrogate-twins-to-go-home/articleshow/5978925.cms

27.

Malhotra

(2010, July 25). More questions than answers over rent-a-womb market. The Hindu. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.hindu.com/op/2010/07/25/stories/2010072553401600.htm

28.

Markens

(2007). Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520252042

29.

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. (2010). The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill 2010. New Delhi: Government of India. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.icmr.nic.in/guide/ART%20REGULATION%20Draft%20Bill1.pdf

30.

Mookerji

(2007, April 11). Surrogate mothers are on the rise in India. DNA. Retrieved May 8, 2011, from http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_surrogate-mothers-are-on-the-rise-in-india_1090119

31.

NCEUS. (2009). The challenge of employment in India. An informal economy perspective (Vol. I). Main Report. New Delhi: Government of India.

32.

NFHS. (2006). National Family Health Survey-3, India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Services. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.nfhsindia.org/nfhs3.shtml

33.

Padmanabhan

(2006, January 19). Hope in the test tube. The Hindu. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.hindu.com/mp/2006/01/19/stories/2006011900540200.htm

34.

Pande

(2009). Not an “angel,” not a “whore.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2), 141–173.

35.

Pinchuk

(2000). A difficult choice in a different voice: Multiple births, selective reduction and abortion. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, 7(29), 30–56.

36.

Planning Commission, Government of India, Tendulkar Committee Report. (2009, November 27). Report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/rep_pov.pdf

37.

Points

(2009). Commercial surrogacy and fertility tourism in India. Durham, NC: Kenan Institute of Ethics, Duke University. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.duke.edu/web/kenanethics/CaseStudies/BabyManji.pdf

38.

Posner

(1989). The ethics and economics of enforcing contracts of surrogate motherhood. The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 5(21), 21–31.

39.

Rana

(2011, April 6). Ahmedabad surrogate mothers to get life insurance for their rented wombs. DNA. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ahmedabad-surrogate-mothers-to-get-life-insurance-for-their-rented-wombs_1528907

40.

Reproductive Technology Council website (2010). Assisted reproductive tech-nology (ART) glossary. Retrieved November 13, 2010, from http://www.rtc.org.au/glossary/index.html

41.

Schulz

(2008). In India, surrogacy has become a global business. Der Spiegel. Retrieved April 12, 2011, from http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,580209,00.html

42.

Sinha

(2010, September 16). Despite 59% drop, India tops maternal mortality list. The Times of India. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-09-16/india/28266591_1_maternal-mortality-pregnancy-and-childbirth-risk-of-maternal-death

43.

The Times of India. (2008a, October 17). Identity certificate issued to surrogate Japanese baby. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-10-17/jaipur/27924444_1_certificate-emiko-yamada-surrogate-mother

44.

The Times of India. (2008b, August 10). Japanese baby finally gets birth certificate. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-08-10/jaipur/27897780_1_certificate-japanese-baby-manji-yamada

45.

United Nations. (1979, December 18). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3970.html

46.

United Nations. (1996, December 16). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b36c0.html

47.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2008). UNDP Human Development Indices. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDI_2008_EN_Tables.pdf

48.

UNICEF. (2008). Progress for children: A report card on maternal mortality. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.unicef.org/childsurvival/files/Progress_for_Children-No._7_Lo-Res_082008.pdf

49.

UNICEF. (2009). State of the world’s children: Maternal and newborn health. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.

50.

UN Population Fund. (1995). Report of the International Conference on Popu-lation and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994 (A/CONF.171/13/Rev.1). Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4a54bc080.html

51.

WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, & World Bank. (2010). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008.Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/9789241500265/en/index.html

52.

WHO. (2006). Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/defining_sexual_health.pdf