Spheres of Lesbian,Gay,Bisexual,and Transgender Struggles

Abstract

This article puts forward a comparative feminist analysis of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues and strategies, and locates these within the diverse contexts of LGBT struggles in Asia. It engages identity politics by highlighting differences in experiences within the LGBT collective political identity. Analysis is based on the three preconference caucuses during the Third International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) Asia Regional Conference which was attended by around 160 LGBT activists, including activists from 16 countries in Asia. The authors analyze the results of three caucuses: the gay and bisexual male caucus, the lesbian and bisexual female caucus, and the transgender caucus. Using an ecological framework, four distinct yet interrelated spheres of LGBT struggles are identified from the caucuses: (a) the self, (b) family and peers, (c) community and/or social movements, and (d) formal institutions and/or social structures. The implications of this article to collective political organizing around LGBT identities focus on three main arguments: (a) the need for sensitivity to power relations within LGBT organizations, (b) the recognition of “specificity” rather than commonality in developing an LGBT agenda, and (c) the possibility of moving beyond identity politics toward “pluralist politics” in LGBT movements.

Keywords

LGBTs in Asia social movements pluralist politics specificity identity politics ILGA-Asia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam, Barry D. , Duyvendak, Jan Willem , & Krouwel, André . (1999). The global emergence of gay and lesbian politics: National imprints of a worldwide movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Blasius, Mark , & Phelan, Shane . (1997). We are everywhere: A historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics. New York: Routledge.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie , & Evans, Gary W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social DevelopmentI, 9(1), 115–125.

de Vela, Tesa C. , & Ofreneo, Mira Alexis P. (2009). Southern feminist movement building: A matter of difference, equality, and transformative leadership. Development, 52(2), 144–149.

Derrida, Jacques . (1972). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne . (2000). The five sexes, revisited. Sciences, 40(4), 18–23.

Gamson, Joshua . (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407.

Haraway, Donna . (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In Linda J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 190–233). New York: Routledge.

Huddy, Leonie . (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://ms.cc.sunysb.edu//~lhuddy/huddy.pdf

10.

International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). (2008). Working to achieve equal rights on a global scale since 1978. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.ilga.org/aboutilga.asp

11.

Lloyd, Moya . (2005). Beyond identity politics: Feminism, power and politics. London: SAGE Publications.

12.

Ofreneo, Mira Alexis P. (2005). Constructing collective identities and mobilizing action in Philippine lesbian and gay social movements. Loyola Schools Review, 4, 3–25.

13.

Ofreneo, Mira Alexis P. (2006). When thinking straight is detrimental to health. Women in Action, (1), 90–98.

14.

Ofreneo, Mira Alexis P. , & de Vela, Tesa C. (2008). Report of proceedings of the 3rd Regional Conference of the International Lesbian and Gay Association—Asia (ILGA-Asia). Manila: Isis International.

15.

Petchesky, Rosalind P. (2008). The language of “sexual minorities” and the politics of identity: A position paper. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(33), 1–6.

16.

Phelan, Shane . (1994). Getting specific: Postmodern lesbian politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

17.

Phelan, Shane . (2001). Sexual strangers: Gays, lesbians, and dilemmas of citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

18.

Sampson, Edward E. (1993). Identity politics: Challenges to psychology’s understanding. American Psychologist, 48(12), 1219–1230.

19.

Seckinelgin, Hakan . (2009). Global activism and sexualities in the time of HIV/AIDS. Contemporary Politics, 15(1), 103–118. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569770802674246

20.

Taylor, Verta , & Whittier, Nancy E. (1998). Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In Peter M. Nardi & Beth E. Schneider (Eds), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies: A reader (pp. 349–365). New York: Routledge.

21.

Wieringa, Saskia E. (2009). From sisterhood and feminist solidarity to affinity groups and feminist communal identities. In Gisela Dütting , Wendy Harcourt , Kinga Lohmann , Lin McDevitt-Pugh , Joanna Semeniuk , & Saskia Wieringa (Eds), A herstory (2004–2008). The European feminist forum (pp. 29–39). Amsterdam: Aletta Institute for Women’s History.

22.

Wieringa, Saskia E. , & Blackwood, Evelyn . (1999). Introduction. In Evelyn Blackwood & Saskia E. Wieringa (Eds), Female desires: Same-sex relations and transgender practices (pp. 1–38). New York: Columbia University Press.

23.

Wilson, Angelia R. (1997). Somewhere over the rainbow: Queer translating. In Shane Phelan (Ed.), Playing with fire: Queer politics, queer theories (pp. 99–111). New York: Routledge.