Historically, the positioning of technology and expertise has been an antithesis to girls and women. Much literature has focused on understanding and responding to the perceived differences between boys’ and girls’ access to, use of, and understanding of various forms of technology. In a recent qualitative study I conducted, eight teenaged technological experts (three of whom were girls) were observed and interviewed about their use of home computers and understanding of technological expertise. In regard to this heterogeneous New Zealand group, the data suggested that, although the trajectories toward technological expertise were gendered, gender did not limit the teenage girls in their acquisition of expertise. This article explores and challenges dichotomous debates about technology, gender, expertise, and then focuses on the understandings of computers as a subject in schools and as a future career. Through this discussion, the article demonstrates that the participants were aware of the gendered stereotypes surrounding girls and technology, yet dismissed them.
Abbott, P. , Wallace, C. , & Tyler, M. (2005). An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives (3rd ed.). London: Routledge .
2.
Aman, J.R. (1992). Gender and attitude toward computers. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 33–46). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education .
3.
Ames, P.C. (2003). Gender and learning style interactions in students’ computer attitudes . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(3), 231–44 .
4.
Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court .
5.
Beynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and culture. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press .
6.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination ( R. Nice , Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press .
7.
Brosnan, M. (1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(1), 63–78 .
8.
Brunner, C. , Bennett, D. , & Honey, M. (1998). Girl games and technological desire. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 72–88). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
9.
Bullen, E. , & Kenway, J. (2002). Who’s afraid of a mouse?—Girls, information technology and educational pleasures. In N. Yelland & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 55–69). New York: Peter Lang Publishing .
10.
Busch, T. (1997). Gender, group composition, cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(2), 125–35 .
11.
Cassell, J. , & Jenkins, H. (1998). Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games. In J. Cassell , & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 2–45). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
12.
Chaika, M. (1995). Ethical considerations in gender-oriented entertainment technology. Crossroads: the Association for Computing Machinery Student Magazine. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-2/gender.html
13.
Christofides, E. , Islam, T. , & Desmarais, S. (2009). Gender stereotyping over instant messenger: The effects of gender and context . Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 897–901 .
14.
Crombie, G. , & Armstrong, P. (1999). Effects of classroom gender composition on adolescents’ computer-related attitudes and future intentions . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 317–27 .
15.
de Castell, S. , & Bryson, M. (1998). Retooling play: dystopia, dysphoria, and difference. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 232–61). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
16.
Durndell, A. , & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample . Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521–35 .
17.
Edwards, C. (1992). Implications of the computer culture for women of color. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 57–70). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education .
18.
Edwards, L.D. (2002). Learning by design: Environments that support girls’ learning with technology. In N. Yelland & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 119–37). New York: Peter Lang Publishing .
19.
Facer, K. , Furlong, J. , Furlong, R. , & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: children and computing in the home. London: Routledge/Falmer .
20.
Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering . Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 759–92 .
21.
Green, E. (2001). Technology, leisure and everyday practices. In E. Green & A. Adam (Eds), Virtual gender: Technology, consumption and identity (pp. 173–88). London: Routledge .
22.
Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, power and technology: Some Tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman .
23.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. New York: Cornell University Press .
24.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. New York: Cornell University Press .
25.
Hollingshead, A.B. , & Fraidin, S.N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 355–63 .
26.
Huber, B. , & Schofield, J.W. (1998). I like computers, but many girls don’t: Gender and the sociocultural context of computing. In H. Bromley & M.W. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 103–32). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
27.
Huff, C.W. , Fleming, J.H. , & Cooper, J. (1992). Gender differences in human computer interaction. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 19–32). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education .
28.
Jackson, L.A. , Ervin, K.S. , Gardner, P.D. , & Schmitt, N. (2001) Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching . Sex Roles, 44(5/6), 363–79 .
29.
Jenson, J. , de Castell, S. , & Bryson, M. (2003). “Girl talk”: Gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture . Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(6), 561–73 . Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/bryson/pdf/wmst.pdf
30.
Jenson, J. & Rose, C.B. (2003). Women@work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers’ talk about new technologies . Gender and Education, 15(2), 169–81 .
31.
Johnson, N.F. (2009a). Teenage technological experts’ views of schooling . Australian Educational Researcher, 36(1), 59–72 . Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://www.aare.edu.au/aer/online/0901_e.pdf
32.
Johnson, N.F. (2009b). Cyber-relations in the field of home computer use for leisure: Bourdieu and teenage technological experts . E-Learning, 6(2), 187–97 .
33.
Johnson, N.F. (2007). Teenage technological experts: Bourdieu and the performance of expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Geelong.
34.
Johnson, N.F. , Rowan, L. , & Lynch J. (2006). Constructions of gender in computer magazine advertisements: Confronting the literature . Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 6(1), 1–9 .
35.
Kadijevich, D. (2000). Gender differences in computer attitude among ninth-grade students . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(2), 145–54 .
36.
Kafai, Y. (1998). Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds), From barbie to mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 90–117). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
37.
Lather, P. (1990). Reinscribing otherwise: The play of values in the practices of the human sciences. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 315–32). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
38.
Lawrence, J. (1984). Girls and computer education. Discussion Paper 3. Equal Opportunity Unit of the Victorian Education Department, Melbourne, VIC .
39.
Lloyd, G. (1993). The man of reason: ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy. London: Routledge .
40.
Lupart, J. , & Cannon, E. (2002). Computers and career choices: Gender differences in grades 7 and 10 students . Gender, Technology and Development, 6(2), 233–48.
41.
Lynch, J. (Ed.). (2007). Gender and IT: Ongoing challenges for computing and information technology education in Australian secondary schools. Deakin West, ACT: Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Inc.
42.
Lynch, J. , Leder, G. , & Forgasz, H. (2001). Mathematics: A dilemma for feminists. In E. MacNabb , M.J. Cherry , S. Popham , & R.P. Prys (Eds), Transforming the disciplines: A women’s studies primer (pp. 185–92). New York: Haworth Press .
43.
Marcelle, G.M. (2004). Thinking BIG to accelerate gender equality and transformation in the ICTs arena . Gender, Technology and Development, 8(1), 31–52 .
44.
Millar, M.S. (1998). Cracking the gender code: Who rules the wired world?Toronto, Ontario: Second Story Press .
45.
Mitra, A. , LaFrance, B. , & McCullough, S. (2001). Differences in attitudes between women and men toward computerization . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 227–44 .
46.
Mitra, A. , Lenzmeier, S. , Steffensmeier, T. , Avon, R. , Qu, N. , & Hazen, M. (2000). Gender and computer use in an academic institution: Report from a longitudinal study . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 67–84 .
47.
Morritt, H. (1997). Women and computer based technologies: A feminist perspective. Lanham, MD: University Press of America .
48.
Nelson, L. , & Cooper, J. (1997). Gender differences in children’s reactions to success and failure with computers . Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2), 247–67 .
49.
Oliveira, R.D. (1991). In praise of difference: The emergence of a global feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
50.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
51.
Ray, S.G. (2004). Gender inclusive game design: Expanding the market. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media .
52.
Selwyn, N. (2006). Exploring the ‘digital disconnect’ between net-savvy students and their schools . Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 5–17 .
53.
Sofia, Z. (1993). Whose second self? Gender and (ir)rationality in computer culture. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press .
54.
Sofia, Z. (1998). The mythic machine: Gendered irrationalities and computer culture. In H. Bromley & M.W. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 29–52). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
55.
Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: Complicating the gender binary . Gender and Education, 13(3), 325–38 .
56.
Turner, E. , & Hovenden, F. (1997). How are we seen? Images of women in computing advertisements. In R. Lander & A. Adam (eds), Women in computing (pp. 60–71). Wiltshire, UK: Cromwell Press .
57.
Turkle, S. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices (pp. 41–61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
58.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and Voices within the computer culture. In C.D. Martin & E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds), In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education (pp. 113–40). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education . Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://www.thinkingcurriculum.com/turklePapert.pdf
59.
Umrani, F. , & Ghadially, R. (2003). Empowering women through ICT education: Facilitating computer adoption . Gender, Technology and Development, 7(3), 359–77 .
60.
Wajcman, J. (2004). Techno feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press .
61.
Webster, J. (1996). Shaping women’s work: Gender, employment and information technology. London: Addison Wesley Longman .
62.
Weinstein, M. (1998). Computer advertising and the construction of gender. In H. Bromley & M.W. Apple (Eds), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 85–102). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
63.
Whitley, B. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis . Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1–22 .
64.
Woodfield, R. (2000). Women, work and computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
65.
Yates, S. , & Littleton, K. (1999). Understanding computer game cultures: A situated approach . Information, Communication & Society, 2(4), 566–83 .
66.
Yelland, N. (2002). Shades of grey: Creating a vision of girls and computers. In N. Yelland , & A. Rubin (Eds), Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with technology (pp. 139–65). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
