Abstract
Philosophies of international science have been challenged by some aspects of the emer gence of various kinds of local knowledge movements and also by overt criticisms of the central concepts and principles of those philosophies. This essay looks at the strengths and limitations of three pro-democratic local knowledge movements and at the scientific and political dysfunctionality of the philosophic idea that modem sciences represent a unique unity of all legitimated scientific knowledge, and that such knowledge is thus uniquely uni versally valid. The projects of the local knowledge movements must be linked to the cri tiques of the philosophies of international science for each to make maximally useful contributions to pro-democratic social relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
