Bernal, J.D. (1939), The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
— (1954), Science in History. London : C.A. Watts & Co.
3.
COZZENS, SUSAN E., PETER HEALEY, ARIE RIP and JOHN Ziman, eds (1990), The Research System in Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4.
Edge, David (1997), 'Beam and Mote', Social Studies of Science, 27 (2), pp. 357-59.
5.
Fuller, Steve (1977), 'Constructing the High Church-Low Church Distinction in STS Textbooks', Technoscience (Newsletter of the Society for Social Studies of Science), 10 (3), pp. 10-11.
6.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Second, enlarged edition.
7.
— (1977), The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Never Been Modem. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
9.
Latour, Bruno with Véronique Vissac-Charles (1996), 'Suivre un projet, c'est repérer ses objets-frontières', in Jocelyn de Noblet, dir., Penser le Futur. Paris: Edition PSA Peugeot Citroën, pp. 180-205.
10.
Mackenzie, Donald and Graham Spinardi (1995), 'Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons',American Journal of Sociology, 101 (1), pp. 44-99.
11.
Pinch, Trevor J. (1982), 'Kuhn—The Conservative and Radical Interpretations' , 4S Newsletter7 (1), 10-25.
12.
Rip, Arie (1979), 'The Social Context of "Science, Technology and Society" Courses', Studies in Higher Education, 4, pp. 15-26.
13.
— (1982), 'The Development of Restrictedness in the Science' , in Norbert Elias, Herminio Martins and Richard Whitley, eds, Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies . Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 219-38.
14.
— (1994), 'Science & Technology Studies and Constructive Technology Assessment', EASST Newsletter 13(3), pp. 11-16. Keynote Speech to EASST Conference, Budapest, 28-31 August.
15.
— (1997), 'A Cognitive Approach to Relevance of Science' , Social Science Information, 36 (4), pp. 615-40.
16.
Rip, Arie and Egbert Boeker (1975), 'Scientists and Social Responsibility in the Netherlands' , Social Studies of Scence, 5, pp. 457-84.
17.
Rip, Arie and René Kemp (1998), 'Technological Change', in Steve Rayner and Elizabeth L. Malone, eds, Human Choice and Climate Change. Volume Two: Resources and Technology . Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press , pp. 327-99.
18.
Rip, Arie, Thomas J. Misa and Johan Schot, eds ( 1995), Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology AssessmentLondon: Pinter Publishers.
19.
Rose, H. and S. Rose (1969), Science and Society. Great Britain: Penguin.
20.
Schwartzman, Simon (1985), 'The Quest for University Research: Policies and Research Organisation in Latin America', in Björn Wittrock and Aant Elzinga, eds, The University Research System. The Public Policies of the Home of Scientists. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 101-16.
21.
Spiegel-Rösing, Ina and Derek De Solla Price (1977), Science, Technology and Society. A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. London and Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
22.
Wolpert, Lewis (1992), The Unnatural Nature of science. London: Faber & Faber.