The fact that some developing countries with authoritarian regimes have achieved high rates of growth and impressive technology development has been interpreted as an indication that authoritarian regimes fare better than democratic ones in the promotion of technical change. This paper argues that, in the Latin American case, authoritarian insulation led to lack of accountability and protected inefficiency; it did not translate into a capacity to elicit the desired innovative behaviour from the relevant players, nor guaranteed the correctness of policy decisions and timely adaptation to changes in the relevant policy parameters. These effects of authoritarian insulation are illustrated with the help of the informatics policies of Brazil and Argentina. Political and social democratisation lead to improved prospecls of more realistic and effective science and technology policies in the region that diffuse what are currently isolated cases of innovative dialogue between the users and producers of technology, that is, those who need a technological solution and those who design it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, E. (1987), The Power of Ideology. The Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Alcorta, L., and W. Peres (1995), 'Investment in Innovation and Technological Adaptability in Latin America and the Caribbean'. Paper presented at the 1995 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, The Sheraton Washington, 28-30 September.
3.
Araoz, A. (1994), The Revitalization of Industrial Technology Research Institutes in Developing Countries. Guidelines forUNIDO . Vienna: UNIDO.
4.
Bardham, P. (1993), 'Symposium on Democracy and Development', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), pp. 45-49.
5.
Bastos, M.-I. (1995), 'State Autonomy and Capacity for Science and Technology Policy Design and Implementation in Brazil', in Maria-Inês Bastos and Charles Cooper, eds, Politics of Technology Policy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
6.
— (1994a), Winning the Battle to Lose the War. Brazilian Electronics Policy under US Threat of SanctionsLondon : Frank Cass.
7.
— (1994b), 'How International Sanctions Worked: Domestic and Foreign Political Constraints on the Brazilian Informatics Policy', Journal of Development Studies, 30(2), pp. 380-404.
8.
Botelho, A.J.J. (1989), 'Struggling to Survive: The Brazilian Society for the Progress of Science (SBPC) and the Authoritarian Regime (1964-1980) ', Historia Scientiarum, 38, pp. 45-63.
9.
Cammack, P. (1994), 'Democratization and Citizenship in Latin America ', in Geraint Parry and Michael Moran, eds, Democracy and Democratization . London: Routledge.
10.
Castro, M.H.M. and J. Balán (1994), 'Universidade Versus Setor Produtivo: A Perspectiva e a Realidade da Universidade'. São Paulo: NUPES/USP , Working Paper 8/94.
11.
Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David (1994), 'Toward a New Economics of Science', Research Policy, 23(5), pp. 487-521.
12.
Elzinga, A. and A. Jamison (1995), 'Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology' , in Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen and Trevor Pinch, eds, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
Erber, F.S. (1995), 'The Political Economy of Technological Development—The Case of the Brazilian Informatics Policy', in Maria-Inês Bastos and Charles Cooper, eds, Politics of Technology Policy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
14.
Fritsch, W. and G. Franco (1991), Foreign Direct Investment in Brazil: Its Impact on Industrial Restructuring. Paris: OECD, Development Centre Studies.
15.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London : Sage Publications.
16.
Kim, L. and C.J. Dahlman (1992), 'Technology Policy for Industrialization: An Integrative Framework and Korea's Experience', Research Policy, 21, pp. 437-52.
17.
Langer, E.D. (1989), 'Generations of Scientists and Engineers: Origins of the Computer Industry in Brazil', Latin American Research Review, 24(2), pp. 95-111.
18.
Lijphart, A. and M.M. Crepaz (1991), 'Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages', British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), pp. 235-46.
19.
Mari, M. (1982), Evolucion de las Concepciones de Politica y Planificacion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Washington, Programa Regional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico, Departamento de Assuntos Cientificos y Tecnologicos, Secretaria General de la Organizacion de los Estados Americanos.
20.
Mowery, D.C. (1994), Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies. Boston/Dordrecht/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21.
Nadal Egea, A. (1995), 'Harnessing the Politics of Science and Technology Policy in Mexico', in Maria-Inês Bastos and Charles Cooper, eds, Politics of Technology Policy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
22.
Nelson, R.N. and H. Pack (1995), 'The Asian Growth Miracle and Modern Growth Theory' . Paper presented at a seminar held at MERIT, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 13 March 1996.
23.
Niosi, J. (1991), 'Canada's National System of Innovation', Science and Public Policy, 18(2), pp. 83-92.
24.
Nochteff, H.J. (1995), 'A Sectoral Approach to Changing Technological Behaviour: Weaknesses of Argentina's Electronics and Informatics Policy', in Maria-Inês Bastos and Charles Cooper, eds, Politics of Technology Policy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
25.
Oteiza, E. (1992), 'EI Complejo Cientifico y Tecnologico argentino en la segunda mitad del siglo XX: La transferencia de modelos institucionales' , in Enrique Oteiza, ed., La Politica de Investigacion Cientifica Y Tecnologica Argentina. Historia y Perspectivas. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.
26.
Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27.
Przeworski, A. and F. Limongi (1993), 'Political Regimes and Economic Growth', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), pp. 51-69.
28.
Remmer, K.L. (1990), 'Democracy and Economic Crisis: The Latin American Experience', World Politics, 42, pp. 315-55.
29.
Roobeek, A.J.M. (1990), Beyond the Technology Race. An Analysis of Technology Policy in Seven Industrial Countries. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30.
Schwartzman, S. (1994), 'Brazil: Scientists and the State—Evolving Models and "The Great Leap Forward"', in Etel Solingen, ed., Scientists and the State. Domestic Structures and the International Context. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
31.
Sørensen, 'G. (1993), 'Democracy, Authoritarianism and State Strength' , The European Journal of Development Research, 5(1), pp. 6-34.
32.
Sutz, J. (1994), 'Los cambios tecnológicos y sus impactos. El largo camino hacia la construcción solidaria de oportunidades', in Hebe M.C. Vessuri, ed., Ciencia, tecnologia y sociedad en America Latina. Caracas, Venezuela: Asociación Latinoamericana de Sociología, Editorial Nueva Sociedad .
33.
Vessuri, H.M.C. (1995), La Academic Va al Mercado. Relaciones de Cientificos Académicos con Clientes ExternosCaracas: Fondo Editorial FINTEC.
34.
Villaschi, A. (1992), 'Is Brazil Ready to Leap-frog under the IT Techno-economic Paradigm? Some Questions Regarding Its Education System'. Paper prepared for the Second International Conference on Science and Technology in Third World Development, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 5-7 April.
