AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AggeriF., Le MassonP., BranciardA., ParadeiseC., & PeerbayeA. (2007). Les plate-formes technologiques dans les sciences de la vie. Revue d’économie industrielle, 120, 21–40.
3.
BarryA. (2001). Political machines: Governing in a technological society. Athlone Press.
4.
BeachamT. A., SweetJ. B., & AllenM. J. (2017). Large-scale cultivation of genetically modified microalgae: A new era for environmental risk assessment. Algal Research, 25, 90–100.
5.
BellivierF., & NoivilleC. (2009). Les biobanques. Presses universitaires de France.
6.
BowkerG. C., & StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
7.
ButtonG., & SharrockW. (1998). The organizational accountability of technological work. Social Studies of Science, 28(1), 73–202.
8.
CarninoG., & MarquetC. (2018). Les datacenters enfoncent le cloud: Enjeux politiques et impacts environnementaux d’internet. Zilsel, 3, 19–62.
9.
ChambersD. W., & GillespieR. (2000). Locality in the history of science: Colonial science, technoscience, and indigenous knowledge. Osiris, 15, 221–240.
10.
ChowdhuryL. M., & SarkarP. K. (2008). Radiological risk of particle accelerators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(8), 1250–1256.
11.
GalisonP. (1987). How experiments end. University of Chicago Press.
12.
GalisonP., & HevlyB. (Eds.). (1992). Big science: The growth of large-scale research. Stanford University Press.
13.
GierynT. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.
14.
GrahamL. R. (1992). Big science in the last years of the big Soviet Union. Osiris, 7, 49–71.
15.
HermannA., KrigeJ., MersitsU., & PestreD. (1987). History of CERN: Vol. 1. Launching the European organization for nuclear research. North-Holland.
16.
JacobM., & HallonstenO. (2012). The persistence of big science and megascience in research and innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 39(4), 411–415.
17.
JouvenetM. (2022). Controverses sur l’origine du SARS-CoV-2: L’hypothèse de la ‘fuite de laboratoire’ et la production des connaissances en virologie. Zilsel, 11, 307–335.
18.
KrigeJ., & PestreD. (1985). A critique of Irvine and Martin’s methodology for evaluating big science. Social Studies of Science, 15(3), 525–539.
19.
LamyJ. (2007). Archéologie d’un espace savant. L’observatoire de Toulouse aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles Rennes. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
20.
LamyJ. (2011). What management does to space projects? The Franco-Soviet project ARCAD 3 in the late 1970s. Science in Context, 24(4), 545–588.
21.
LamyJ., & DavoustE. (2009). General-purpose and dedicated regimes in the use of large telescopes of the 20th century. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 12(3), 189–200.
22.
MangematinV., & PeerbayeA. (2004). Les grands équipements en sciences de la vie: Quelle politique publique?Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 112(4), 705–718.
23.
OngA., & CollierS. J. (Eds.) (2008). Global assemblages. Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell.
24.
PickstoneJ. V. (2000). Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester University Press.
25.
PooM. (2022). International cooperation through big science programs. National Science Review, 9(8), nwac187.
26.
RobinsonM. (2021). Big science collaborations: Lessons for global governance and leadership. Global Policy, 12(1), 66–80.
27.
ShinnT. (1993). The Bellevue grand électroaimant, 1900–1940: Birth of a research-technology community. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 24(1), 157–187.
28.
SimoulinV. (2016). Les générations de synchrotrons: Des communautés et des équipements au croisement du national et de l’international. Revue française de sociologie, 57(3), 503–528.
29.
SimoulinV. (2017). An instrument can hide many others: Or how multiple instruments grow into a polymorphic instrumentation. Social Science Information, 56(4), 416–433.
30.
SimoulinV. (2018). The synchrotron generations: Communities and facilities at the crossroads between the national and the international. Revue française de sociologie, 57(3), 340–361.
31.
StinchcombeA. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. University of Chicago Press.
32.
TaylorR., PortoF., CuiC., WadadekarY., & MalovO. (2021). Big data research infrastructure collaboration toward the SKA (BRICSKA). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93 (Suppl. 1), e20201027.
33.
TraweekS. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high-energy physicists. Harvard University Press.
34.
WeinbergA. M. (1961). Impact of large-scale science on the United States. Science, 134(3473), 161–164.
35.
WhitleyR. (1981). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press.
36.
ZabuskyS. E. (1995). Launching Europe: An ethnography of European cooperation in space science. Princeton University Press.