This study examines how the professionalisation of tacit knowledge and innovation capacity affects enterprise development in family businesses experiencing generational change. A conceptual framework is developed to link organisational outcomes with shifts in objective setting that influence innovation and development. Focusing on historical family business profiles from Malaysia’s Companies Commission (SSM), the research uses multiple case studies and in-depth interviews to explore the professionalisation of tacit knowledge and innovation capacity in family-owned firms in the rubber industry. As the fifth-largest producer and exporter of natural rubber, Malaysia serves as a relevant context to analyse how the interplay between tacit knowledge and innovation capacity impacts operations, management, and outcomes during generational transitions in a knowledge-based economy.
AdjeiE. K., ErikssonR. H., LindgrenU., & HolmE. (2018). Familial relationships and firm performance: The impact of entrepreneurial family relationships. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(5–6), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1430425
2.
AgénorP.-R., & CanutoO. (2012). Middle-income growth traps (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6210). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6210
3.
AokiM. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press.
4.
AronoffC. E., & WardJ. L. (1995). Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model for the future?Family Business Review, 8(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00121.x
5.
ChandlerA. D.Jr., (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Harvard University Press.
6.
ChandlerA. D.Jr., (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press.
7.
ChandlerA. D.Jr., (1997). The United States: Engines of economic growth in the capital-intensive and knowledge-intensive industries. In The Cambridge economic history of the United States (pp. 63–101). Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChandlerA. D.Jr., AmatoriF., & HikinoT. (1999). Big business and the wealth of nations. Cambridge University Press.
9.
CraigJ., & DibrellC. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00082.x
10.
DamanpourF. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.5465/2 56406
11.
DavisP. S., & HarvestonP. D. (2000). Internationalization and organizational growth: The impact of internet usage and technology involvement among entrepreneur-led family businesses. Family Business Review, 13(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00107.x
12.
De MassisA., & KotlarJ. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
13.
DeshpandéR., FarleyJ. U., & WebsterF. E.Jr., (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700102
14.
DonerR. F., & SchneiderB. R. (2016). Supplementary material. Comparative Political Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000095
15.
DrabbleJ. H. (1972). Investment in the rubber industry in Malaya c. 1900–1922. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 3(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463400002020
16.
DrozdowN. (1989). Thinking that is intuitive to the boss must be chartered for the next generation. Business Week Newsletter for Family-Owned Business, 1(19).
17.
EisenhardtK. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt method, really?Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020906260
18.
ElbaumB., & LazonickW. (1987). The decline of the British economy. In The decline of the British economy (pp. 1–17). Oxford University Press.
19.
GersickK. E., DavisJ. A., HamptonM. M., & LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press.
20.
GomezE. T. (2007). Family firms, generational change, and identity formation: The Chinese in Britain and Malaysia. East Asia, 24(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-007-9010-5
21.
Gómez-MejíaL., Núñez-NickelM., & GutiérrezI. (2002). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069280
22.
GravesC., & ThomasJ. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119.x
23.
HabbershonT. G., & WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
24.
HadjimanolisA. (2000). An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing country. R&D Management, 30(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00183
25.
HandlerW. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00257.x
26.
HaraF. (1991). Malaysia’s new economic policy and the Chinese business community. The Developing Economies, 29(4), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1991.tb00773.x
27.
HarrisD., MartinezJ. L., & WardJ. L. (1994). Is strategy different for family-owned businesses?Family Business Review, 7(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00159.x
28.
HultG. T. M., HurleyR. F., & KnightG. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.007
29.
JesudasonJ. V. (1989). Ethnicity and the economy: The state, Chinese business, and multinationals in Malaysia. Oxford University Press.
30.
Kean YewJ. L. (2023a). A conceptual framework for tacit knowledge transformation in family business: A case study of a plastic family firm in Malaysia. Vision. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231151663
31.
Kean YewJ. L. (2023b). From family firm to Japanese OEM in tacit knowledge innovation: A case study of Sin Kwang Plastic Resources in Malaysia. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(6), 966–984. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2022-0215
32.
Kean YewJ. L., & XavierJ. A. (2022). Strategizing family business with a Chandlerian perspective on 3Ms: A case study of London Biscuits Berhad in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-06-2021-0215
33.
KhorK. P. (1983). The Malaysian economy: Structures and dependence. Maricans.
34.
LeblancL. J., NashR., GallagherD., GondaK., & KakizakiF. (1997). A comparison of U.S. and Japanese technology management and innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 13, 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001074
35.
LeonidouL., KatsikeasC., & PiercyN. (1998). Identifying managerial influences on exporting: Past research and future directions. Journal of International Marketing, 6(2), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9800600205
36.
LiebeskindJ. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171008
37.
LumpkinG. T., & DessG. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
38.
Malaysian exports data. (1998–2013). World Integrated Trade Solution. Retrieved, 14January2026, from https://wits.worldbank.org/
39.
MilitaruA. M. G., KurtA., & GümüşM. (2024). Analysis of national strategic innovation objectives using adapted Porter’s diamond model: A comparison of Romania and Türkiye. Competitiveness Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2023-0135
40.
Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry. (2023). New Industry Master Plan 2030: Rubber-based product industry in Malaysia. Retrieved, 14January2026, from https://www.miti.gov.my/
41.
MorckR., & YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6520.00016
42.
MorrisM. H., WilliamsR. O., AllenJ. A., & AvilaR. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-2
43.
NguyenL. H., KanbachD. K., & KrausS. (2024). Facilitating corporate sustainability integration: Innovation in family firms. Journal of Family Business Managemen. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2023-0136
44.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
45.
NonakaI., ToyamaR., & KonnoN. (2000). SECI, Ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
46.
OthmanK., & Yeoh. (1986). An overview of the plastics industry in Malaysia [Paper presentation]. The Workshop on Plastics Technology, Malaysia Industry Development.
47.
PenroseE. T. (1980). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell.
48.
PolanyiM. (1966). The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
49.
RattenV., & DanaL.-P. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship, family farms, and the dairy industry. In Research anthology on strategies for maintaining successful family firms (pp. 898–916). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8590-6.ch046
50.
SalvatoC., & MooresK. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23, 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510370660
51.
SchweigerN., MatzlerK., HautzJ., & de MassisA. (2023). Family businesses and strategic change: The role of family ownership. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00600-5
52.
SiguawJ. A., SimpsonP. M., & EnzC. A. (2006). Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00225.x
53.
ŚledzikK. (2013). Schumpeter’s view on innovation and entrepreneurship. In HittmarS. (Ed.), Management trends in theory and practice. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257783
54.
SteierL. (2001). Family firm, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00353.x
55.
TanT. W. (1982). Income distribution and determination in West Malaysia. Oxford University Press.
56.
Tan Chin Nam. (2006). Tan Chin Nam: Never say I assume!. MPH Group Publishing.
57.
TeeceD. J. (2010). Alfred Chandler and ‘capabilities’ theories of strategy and management. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq007
58.
TurnerK. L., & MakhijaM. V. (2006). The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 31, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.197
59.
UptonN. B., & HeckR. K. (1997). The family business dimension of entrepreneurship. Upstart Publishing Company.
60.
VesperiW., MelinaA. M., CristofaroC. L., & VenturaM. (2023). First (latent) generation and family business: A perspective article. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2023-0136
61.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability and family leadership. Jossey-Bass.
62.
WeidenbaumM., & HughesS. (1996). The bamboo network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new economic superpower in Asia. Free Press.
63.
ZahraS. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00003.x
64.
ZahraS. A., & CovinJ. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00001-6
