Science,Technology and Innovation for a Post-growth Society

Ahmed H. , Qureshi O. M. , & Khan A. A. (2015). Reviving a ghost in the history of technology: The social construction of the recumbent bicycle. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 130–136.

Alexander S. , & Yacoumis P. (2018). Degrowth, energy descent, and ‘low-tech’ living: Potential pathways for increased resilience in times of crisis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1840–1848.

Almazán A. (2024). A sociohistorical ontology of technics: Beyond technology. Environmental Values, 33(1), 12–27.

Almazán A. , & Prádanos L. I. (2024). The political ecology of technology: A non-neutrality approach. Environmental Values, 33(1), 3–9

Birch K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for techno scientific capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(1), 3–33.

Birch K. , & Muniesa F. (Eds). (2020). Assetization: Turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. MIT Press.

Boczkowski P. J. (1999). Mutual shaping of users and technologies in a national virtual community. Journal of Communication, 49(2), 86–108.

Chen Y. S. , Lin M. J. J. , Chang C. H. , & Liu F. M. (2009). Technological innovations and industry clustering in the bicycle industry in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(3), 207–217.

Chiengkul P. (2018). The degrowth movement: alternative economic practices and relevance to developing countries. Alternatives, 43(2), 81–95.

Chiffoleau Y. (2009). From politics to co-operation: The dynamics of embeddedness in alternative food supply chains. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(3), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00491.x

Dacin M. T. , & Dacin P. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In Greenwood R. , Oliver C. , Sahlin K. , & Suddaby R. (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 327, pp. 352)–352). Sage Publications.

Demaria F. , Kallis G. , & Bakker K. (2019). Geographies of degrowth: Nowtopias, resurgences and the decolonization of imaginaries and places. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), 431–450.

Demmer U. , & Hummel A. (2017). Degrowth, anthropology, and activist research: The ontological politics of science. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 610–622.

Dolci G. , Caserini S. , Venturelli V. , & Grosso M. (2024). Environmental impacts analysis of European and Chinese bicycle manufacturing. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05550-0

Escobar A. (1992). Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements. Social Text, 31(32), 20–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/466217

Escobar A. (2004). Beyond the third world: Imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185417

Escobar A. (2015). Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: A preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10, 451–462.

Gerber J. F. , & Raina R. S. (2018). Post-growth in the global south? Some reflections from India and Bhutan. Ecological Economics, 150, 353–358.

Goto K. (2013). STS and Marxist study: Where are we standing now? Social Epistemology, 27(2), 125–129.

Hess D. J. (2013). Neoliberalism and the history of STS theory: Toward a reflexive sociology. Social Epistemology, 27(2), 177–193.

Hickel J. (2023). On technology and degrowth. Monthly Review, 75(3), 44–50.

Hickel J. , Sullivan D. , & Zoomkawala H. (2021). Plunder in the post-colonial era: quantifying drain from the global south through unequal exchange, 1960–2018. New Political Economy, 26(6), 1030–1047.

Hickel J. , Dorninger C. , Wieland H. , & Suwandi I. (2022). Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Global Environmental Change, 73, 102467.

Hoffman S. G. (2018). The responsibilities and obligations of STS in a moment of post-truth demagoguery. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 444–452.

Holman B. (2020). STS, Post-truth, and the rediscovery of bullshit. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 370–390.

Howson P. (2021). Distributed degrowth technology: Challenges for blockchain beyond the green economy. Ecological Economics, 184, 107020.

Howson P. , Crandall J. , & Balaguer Rasillo X. (2021). Digital degrowth innovation: Less growth, more play. Political Geography, 88, 102415.

Jasanoff S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In states of knowledge (pp. 1–12). Routledge.

Jasanoff S. , & Kim S. H. (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press.

Joutsenvirta M. (2016). A practice approach to the institutionalization of economic degrowth. Ecological Economics, 128, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2016.04.006

Kallis G. , Kostakis V. , Lange S. , Muraca B. , Paulson S. , & Schmelzer M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291–316.

Kerschner C. , Wächter P. , Nierling L. , & Ehlers M. H. (2018). Degrowth and technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636.

Lave R. , Mirowski P. , & Randalls S. (2010). Introduction: STS and neoliberal science. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 659–675.

Lloveras J. , Marshall A. P. , Warnaby G. , & Kalandides A. (2021). Mobilising sense of place for degrowth? Lessons from Lancashire’s anti-fracking activism. Ecological Economics, 183, 106754.

Miller B. (2021). Is technology value-neutral? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1), 53–80.

Owen R. , & Pansera M. (2019). Responsible innovation and responsible research and innovation (pp. 26–48). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pandey P. , Valkenburg G. , Mamidipudi A. , & Bijker W. (2020). Responsible research and innovation in the global south: Agriculture, renewable energy and the pursuit of symmetry. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 215–222.

Pansera M. , & Fressoli M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization, 28(3), 380–404.

Pansera M. , & Owen R. (2018). Innovation for de-growth: A case study of counter-hegemonic practices from Kerala, India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1872–1883.

Pansera M. , & Owen R. (2019). Innovation and development: The politics at the bottom of the pyramid (1st ed.). Wiley-ISTE.

Pansera M. , Lloveras J. , & Durrant D. (2024). The infrastructural conditions of (de-) growth: The case of the internet. Ecological Economics, 215, 108001.

Pinch T. J. , & Bijker W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.

Pursell C. (1993). The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States, 1965–1985. Technology and Culture, 34(3), 629–637.

Rätzer M. , Hartz R. , & Winkler I. (2018). Editorial: Post-Growth organizations. Management Revue, 29(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-3-193

Renting H. , Marsden T. K. , & Banks J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3510

Rochfort H. B. (2024, 2 October). The 12 best mountain bikes of 2024, according to biking enthusiasts. https://edition.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/outdoors/best-mountain-bikes

Roy P. , Miah M. D. , & Zafar M. T. (2019). Environmental impacts of bicycle production in Bangladesh: A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment approach. SN Applied Sciences, 1, 1–16.

Sandbach F. (1978). The rise and fall of the limits to growth debate. Social Studies of Science, 8(4), 495–520.

Schumacher E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs.

Sharma A. (2020). ‘We do not want fake energy’: The social shaping of a solar micro-grid in rural India. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 308–324.

Smith A. , & Ely A. (2025). From limits to growth to post-growth: The international politics of technology in historical perspective. Science, Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326833

Taylor P. J. , & Patzke K. (2021). From radical science to STS. Science as Culture, 30(1), 1–10.

Vandeventer J. S. , & Lloveras J. (2021). Organizing degrowth: The ontological politics of enacting degrowth in OMS. Organization, 28(3), 358–379.

Vandeventer J. S. , & Schmid B. (2024). What does degrowth do in/to empirical research? Methodological deliberations on placing degrowth ‘in the world’. Ecological Economics, 221, 108206.

Vetter A. (2018). The matrix of convivial technology: Assessing technologies for degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1778–1786.

Vicdan H. , Ulusoy E. , Tillotson J. S. , Hong S. , Ekici A. , & Mimoun L. (2024). Food prosumption technologies: A symbiotic lens for a degrowth transition. Marketing Theory, 24(2), 289–309.

Von Hippel E. (2006). Democratizing innovation (p. 216). The MIT Press.

Weiss M. , & Cattaneo C. (2017). Degrowth–taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm. Ecological Economics, 137, 220–230.

Werskey G. (2007). The Marxist critique of capitalist science: A history in three movements? Science as Culture, 16(4), 397–461.

Wieser B. (2017). It’s not just about speed: Reviewing the recumbent bicycle once more. Social Studies of Science, 47(2), 300–304.

Winner L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.

Woodhouse E. , Hess D. , Breyman S. , & Martin B. (2002). Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 297–319.