This study attempts to extend the definition of social innovation within the context of academic entrepreneurship. We consider how academic entrepreneurs can undertake commercial activities, and which ones, and how these activities contribute to the contexts of social innovation. We explore two cases that are derived from two premier universities in Taiwan in terms of research and academic entrepreneurship: OurCityLove from National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) and the Forest app from National Tsing Hua University (NTHU). The two cases show how social enterprises achieved the financial ability to expand their businesses and create the desired social values. While the first case, derived from NCTU, focused on providing useful information on social spaces, and services for the elderly, parents traveling with babies and those with disabilities (and also creating job opportunities for the latter), the other from NTHU created an app to influence those addicted to playing with their smartphones. The cases illustrate how the two universities capitalised on their technological competencies and academic programmes to support graduates and researchers in venturing into social entrepreneurship.
AlbertP., & GaynorL. (2006). Technology business incubation management: Lessons of experience. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., & MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 131–143). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
2.
BaeZ-T., & ParkS. (2011). University technology commercialization and academic entrepreneurship in Korea: The KAIST experience. In WongP-K. (Ed.), Academic entrepreneurship in Asia: The role and impact of universities in national innovation systems (pp. 108–134). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3.
BattilianaJ., LeeM., WalkerJ., & DorseyC. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.
4.
BernasconiM. (2006). Creation processes as evolving projects: High-tech firms as emerging systems. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., & MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 174–187). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
5.
BernasconiM., DibiaggioL., & FerraryM. (2006). High-tech clusters: Network richness in Sophia Antipolis and Silicon Valley. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., & MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 93–111). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
6.
DeesJ. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 54–69.
7.
DruilheC., & GarnseyE. (2003). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? (Working Paper Series No. 2003/02). Cambridge, MA: Center for Technology Management, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.
8.
DruilheC., & GarnseyE. (2006). University spin-out firms: Patterns of development based on expertise. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., & MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 158–174). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
9.
FüllerJ. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.
10.
GlasmeierA., & ChristophersonS. (2015). Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3–12.
11.
GrootA., & DankbaarB. (2014). Does social innovation require social entrepreneurship?Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 17–26.
12.
HarrisS. (2006). Network relationships in different cultures: High tech globalization meets local cultures. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., & MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 112–130). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
13.
HaveR. P., & RubalcabaL. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.
14.
HuM-C. (2009). Developing Entrepreneurial Universities in Taiwan: the Effect of Research Funding Sources. Science, Technology & Society14(1), 56–68.
15.
LiuP. C. B., ChenD-Z., & ChiouJ-D. (2011). University technology commercialization in Taiwan: National Taiwan University (NTU) and National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST). In WongP-K. (Ed.), Academic entrepreneurship in Asia: The role and impact of universities in National Innovation Systems (pp. 199–222). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
16.
MathesonK. (2008). How universities can enable social innovation. Open Source Business Resource. Retrieved from http://timreview.ca/article/188
17.
MathewsJ., & HuM-C. (2007). Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: The case of Taiwan. World Development, 35(6), 1005–1020.
18.
MoreauF. (2006). Strategy development process: The importance of considering integration and timing. In BernasconiM., HarrisS., MoenstedM. (Eds.), High-tech entrepreneurship, managing innovation, variety and uncertainty (pp. 144–157). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
19.
MulganG., TuckerS., AliR., & SandersB. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated (Working Paper for Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship). Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
20.
NelsonJ., & JenkinsB. (2006). Investing in social innovation: Harnessing the potential of partnership between corporations and social entrepreneurs, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative (Working Paper No. 20). Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
21.
NelsonR. R. (1996). The source of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
RogersE. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
23.
SangM. L., OlsonD. L., & TrimiS. (2012). Co-innovation: Convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817–831.
24.
UrbanB. (2010). Creating value and innovation through social entrepreneurship. In UrbanB. (Ed.), Frontiers in entrepreneurship, perspectives in entrepreneurship (pp. 115–138). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
25.
WongC-Y. (2016). Evolutionary targeting for inclusive development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(2), 291–316.
26.
WongC-Y., HuM-C., & ShiuJ-W. (2015). Governing the economic transition: How Taiwan strategically transformed its industrial system to attain virtuous cycle development. Review of Policy Research, 32(3), 365–387.
27.
WongP-K. (Ed.). (2011). Academic entrepreneurship in Asia: The role and impact of universities in national innovation systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28.
WongP-K., HoY-P., & SinghA. (2011). Contribution of universities to national innovation systems in Asia: Technology commercialization and academic. In WongP-K. (Ed.), Academic entrepreneurship in Asia: The role and impact of universities in national innovation systems (pp. 1–28). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
29.
ZimmermanM. A., & ZeitzG. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.
