AbrahamI. (2006). The contradictory spaces of postcolonial techno-science. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(3), 210–217.
2.
AndersonW. (1998). Where is the postcolonial history of medicine?Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 72(3), 522–530.
3.
AndersonW. (2002). Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5), 643–658.
4.
AndersonW. (2004). Postcolonial histories of medicine. In WarnerJohn Harley & HuismanFrank (Eds), Medical history: The stories and their meanings (pp. 285–307). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
AndersonW. (2009). From subjugated knowledge to conjugated subjects: Science and globalisation, or postcolonial studies of science?Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 389–400.
6.
AndersonW. (2012). Asia as method in science and technology studies. East Asian Science, Technology and Society Journal, 6(4), 445–451.
7.
AndersonW. (2014a). Making global health history: The postcolonial worldliness of biomedicine. Social History of Medicine, 27(2), 372–384.
8.
AndersonW. (2014b). Racial conceptions in the global south. ISIS, 105(4), 782–792.
9.
AndersonW. (2015a). Postcolonial science studies. In WrightJames D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 652–567). Oxford: Elsevier.
10.
AndersonW. (2015b). The frozen archive, or defrosting Derrida. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(3), 379–387.
11.
AndersonW. (2015c). Edge effects in science and medicine. Western Humanities Review, 69(3), 373–384.
12.
AndersonW. (2016). Simply a hypothesis? Race and ethnicity in the global south. Humanities Australia, 7, 55–62.
13.
AndersonW. (n.d., a). Applying a southern solvent: An interview with Warwick Anderson, by Marcos Cueto and Ricardo Ventura Santos. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos.
14.
AndersonW. (n.d., b). Postcolonial specters of STS. East Asian Science, Technology and Society Journal.
15.
AndersonW., & AdamsV. (2007). Pramoedya’s chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience. In HackettEdward J., AmsterdamskaOlga, LynchMichael & WajcmanJudy (Eds), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 181–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
AndersonW., & MackayI.R. (2014). Intolerant bodies: A short history of autoimmunity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
BaumanZ. (1993). Modernity and ambivalence. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
18.
ChakrabartyDipesh. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
21.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22.
LinW.Y., & LawJ. (2014). A correlative STS: Lessons from a Chinese medical practice. Social Studies of Science, 44(6), 801–824.
23.
LinW.Y., & LawJ. (2015). We have never been latecomers? Making knowledge spaces for East Asian technosocial practices. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 9(2), 117–126.
24.
PrakashG. (1999). Another reason: Science and the imagination of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
PrasadA. (2016). Discursive contextures of science: Euro/west-centrism and science and technology studies. Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 2, 193–207.